Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, by Erkki

John Loftus re-posted the comments from one of the comments made by one of his readers who goes by the name Erkki. Obviously, Loftus thinks that this is a well-reasoned argument.
Punishment has to serve a purpose, other than satisfying the punisher's lust for vengeance, in order to be of use. However, the Biblegod's version of punishment means that if you don't believe, your punishment never stops. It's pure vengeance. Unconditional love means that you use punishment only to correct and reform the wrongdoer. It's still tough love enough, for punishment is always tough to go through, but of course temporary, corrective punishment for sins is "too vanilla" or "too soft on sin" to please the conservative/fundamentalist segment of Christianity, heh. There's that lust for violence in the believers who adamantly preach that anyone who doesn't believe as they believe go to hell. It's a perversion, really.
I'm an atheist and I'm opposed to any religion that teaches the monstrosity of everlasting hell. So revolting is this concept that I can't see why any rational human being could accept this fear-mongering nonsense. But I'm sure if God exists, he's much nicer than the religious fanatics portray him to be. And more willing to correct even the worst villain ever and punish him only to cleanse him of his sins altogether. Because this is true love: to redeem even the worst among humans. Otherwise Satan or whoever is responsible for making humans sin is more powerful than God himself.
There are several points here I think are missed by people who holds Erkki's view of God's nature, character, and what hell is.
1. Hell is not just about punishment. No one goes to hell for what they did but because of what they are - sinners. We all deserve to go to hell. We all have earned God's wrath because we are not holy.
2. Think about what Erkki is saying: Unconditional love means that you use punishment only to correct and reform the wrongdoer. It's still tough love enough, for punishment is always tough to go through, but of course temporary, corrective punishment for sins is "too vanilla" or "too soft on sin" to please the conservative/fundamentalist segment of Christianity, heh. Who said? How was this conclusion reached? We have a characterization of "unconditional love" given without any proof that it's correct. I would argue that God has provided the means so that we can be cleansed of sin and be with Him forever - Jesus' atoning sacrifice and resurrection. Why should God allow you to avoid hell if you reject his grace and demand that you do it your own way?
3. How is this fear-mongering? How is this nonsense? Do you let people come in your house and do whatever they want no matter what you think? Nope. We live in God's universe. Why would God not have the right to enforce His will and standards regardless of what you think of those standards? He has every right.
4. What is there to fear if you obey God? In Jesus there is no condemnation. If hell frightens you, just put your faith in Christ. Simple.
Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, by Erkki
Enhanced by Zemanta

8 comments:

  1. Marcus; it's funny how you go to great lengths to explain how the concept of hell is not fear-mongering, and then close with "If hell frightens you, just put your faith in Christ. Simple."

    I think you made Erkki's point!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Erkki has no point, Ryan. I'm saying that if you are saved you have no reason to fear hell. There is no reason to be afraid because God has made provision because you don't have to go to hell. If hell frightens you, you can do something about it that does not include ignoring it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can't speak for Erkki, but if you are atheist, there is also no reason to fear hell, for obvious reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just because you don't believe something doesn't mean it isn't real.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Correct, but there's also no evidence too. That's really the kicker.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Part of The athiest argument seems to be that people in he'll would want to repent. They do not (Rev. 22).

    ReplyDelete
  7. J.K. I'm pretty sure most atheists don't think anyone is actually in hell.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Again just because you don't think there is a hell does not mean that there is no hell. J.K. is pointing out that anyone who rejects God would not want to be in heaven. There is plenty evidence for the Bible and for God. If you choose to believe that the evidence that God has provided is not good enough, feel free to tell God that when you stand before God to be judged. Good luck with that, Ryan. Not a threat. Not trying to scare you. Its just simple logic given that the Bible is true.

    ReplyDelete