tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1767816867480783958.post2523099207577521354..comments2024-02-29T23:54:20.606-08:00Comments on What had happen' was.....: FacePalm of the Day - Debunking Christianity: Apologists Are Made to be Stupid Because of Their Delusionmmcelhaneyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07567242628894011776noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1767816867480783958.post-69038818571847996152012-05-04T16:39:58.200-07:002012-05-04T16:39:58.200-07:00Hopefully you now understand how the quote applies...<b>Hopefully you now understand how the quote applies and the context. </b><br /><br />No, explain, if you are capable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1767816867480783958.post-60371037433199155232012-05-04T14:37:03.955-07:002012-05-04T14:37:03.955-07:00Hopefully you now understand how the quote applies...Hopefully you now understand how the quote applies and the context. <br /><br />So you realize that you may be wrong that Material naturalism does as much as you think it does? Well, there may be hope for you.mmcelhaneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07567242628894011776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1767816867480783958.post-64229569921959958452012-05-04T03:37:05.864-07:002012-05-04T03:37:05.864-07:00Marcus; I'm aware of what the passage was abou...Marcus; I'm aware of what the passage was about, that's why I thought it was weird that you'd post it about John. <br /><br /><b>First you admit you can be wrong and then claim that material naturalism answers everything better than any other religion or worldview.</b><br /><br />Yes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1767816867480783958.post-72761106069604735022012-05-03T20:56:44.984-07:002012-05-03T20:56:44.984-07:00You think John Loftus makes displays of power thro...<b>You think John Loftus makes displays of power through signs and wonders? Weird...</b><br /><br />You and He claims that everything can be explained by material naturalism (which he confuses with science). That's making a display of power that you can't substantiate. But you show your Biblical illiteracy because the part about signs and wonders is referring to the Antichrist and I sure don't think John Loftus is the Antichrist. He's not important enough. The rest of the passage fits you and Loftus. <br /><br />You are very inconsistent or either you are consistently wrong. Take your pick. First you admit you can be wrong and then claim that material naturalism answers everything better than any other religion or worldview. Not even close.mmcelhaneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07567242628894011776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1767816867480783958.post-36161367926423755622012-05-03T18:02:08.259-07:002012-05-03T18:02:08.259-07:00You think John Loftus makes displays of power thro...You think John Loftus makes displays of power through signs and wonders? Weird...<br /><br /><b>it's as if it never occurs to them that they could be wrong - that the delusion could be theirs.</b><br /><br />I can't speak for everyone, but of course it does, of course we could be deluded. We both could be deluded and the Muslims or Mormons or Hindus or Druse or Buddhists or Animists or Sikhs or Juches or Jews or Bahai or Jains or Shintos or Zorastrians or Pagans or Rastafarians or Scientologists are the ones that are right. But what you have to do is weigh the actual evidence and determine what is more probable, and material naturalism wins every time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com