Even An Atheist Agrees

I found a very interesting video on YouTube the other day. In it, the author asserts that Intelligent Design is just Creationism and it's a logical argument. I agree. It makes no sense to argue that aliens created us because you have to go backwards to infinity asking who created each successive species. I agree that because the Universe is finite and not eternal this means that there must be a being with the same attributes the Bible ascribes to God: omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, personal, and transcendent. Of course the author is an atheist so he concludes that there is no God because there in testable way to prove it. Here is the video:



I've got to ask, what is worse: an untestable hypothesis or a hypothesis that has been proven wrong? Supporters of evolution admit that their theory does not cover everything or answers all questions. Humanity has been keeping records for a long time...why haven't noticed any gradual change, that left unchecked, would result in one species evolving into another. I realize that the counter argument is that it take millions of years of gradual change. Grant it. But wouldn't you expect to see something on a genetic level where mutations would lead to another species? Since we don't I would infer that macro evolution does not correctly predict or explain anything and that there must be some other rational explanations for the data we observe.

As for how do we know God created everything, the Bible tells us.

Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. This is what the ancients were commended for.
By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible. Hebrews 11:1,2

Considering that there is so much that macro evolution cannot explain and it must be inferred that species like humans and apes, whales and land animals, amphibians and fish, and birds and reptiles have common ancestors, what is the difference between faith in God and faith in macro evolution. I keep hearing that tired old drum, we have evidence, but they refuse to consider other interpretations and evidence that kills the theory of evolution. The Bible on the other hand is uncontravertible and can't be proven wrong. Which do you want to put your faith on?