I came across this news story and I am shocked. St Matthew-in-the-City Church in Auckland, New Zealand recently put up a bill board shown on the left. I don't know what kind of response this springs up in you, but I find it offensive for two reasons. It makes me wonder what was the message the church was trying to send? I did some research and I found the following quote:
Church vicar Archdeacon Glynn Cardy said the billboard was intended to challenge stereotypes about the way Jesus was conceived and get people talking about the Christmas story.
"This billboard is trying to lampoon and ridicule the very literal idea that God is a male and somehow this male God impregnated Mary," said Cardy, who described his church as having very liberal ideas about Christianity.
"We would question the Virgin Birth in any literal sense. We would question the maleness of God in any literal sense," he said.
In other words, the point was to take a swipe at fundamental Christian doctrine and
theology. It's admitted that they were making fun of the doctrine of Jesus' virgin birth by implying that God had sex with Mary. The Bible never implies that Jesus' conception was sexual. On top of that the man said that they are coming against the maleness of God. However, God is never described as male or female...God is beyond all of that. Historic Orthodox Christianity has never embraced these ideas.
Once I found out what kind of church this is, I was not surprised. It's a liberal
Anglican church. Anglican church is certainly no longer orthodox. They used to be but they really seemed to have "jumped the shark" so to speak. I went to
St Matthew-in-the-City Church in Auckland, New Zealand main website and found that like many American Anglican churches are performing
same-sex marriages and like more than a few churches today have turned its back on the Bible as being the final authority for faith and practice.
You can imagine that the billboard has offended a lot of people.
Lyndsay Freer, spokeswoman for the Catholic Diocese of Auckland, said the poster was offensive to Christians.
"Our Christian tradition of 2,000 years is that Mary remains a virgin and that Jesus is the son of God, not Joseph," she told the New Zealand Herald. "Such a poster is inappropriate and disrespectful."
As a Roman Catholic she holds to the
perpetual virginity of Mary, for which there is only Roman Catholic dogma and tradition that we have support so of course she is not happy. I want to be clear that not all Christians dislike the billboard for the same reasons or would agree with her 2000 year assertion or Mary always being a virgin. I've already written on why I disagree with her. However, I do agree that the billboard is wrong but for denying Jesus' virgin birth or trying to cast God as having human gender is wrong.
Sources:
BBC News - Unholy row over New Zealand Mary and Joseph billboard
Religious billboard provokes wrath, mirth
Billboard Depicting Joseph, Mary In Bed Sparks Row
Vicar wants to keep billboard
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vUJf5WPgaEAnuzozy1wz0mi9PZ9oW5pEzM-MzohTdIpJx3E-hHdsVbLhd5A7pL5mLck02hB9iaSeOhLSlpQ5XXSfMa7DMMCn9AC_5rHF7Ag68L2NfSRY3vb-_PufJWojnJIVlQn5UIOsij9CFNNndg=s0-d)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uk8kUG2tRIlne5w3WWZuPhc74dILTmK5R347XrU2yAPlucriOiBfmmRJet0RHkIphtHBRMbUYAManZ66Vr7zUij1GCIpc12V1ocQSxTacDgmwU-VaX75oaTgNwhbYSqCjrOYDemS_DEkIy=s0-d)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tDuDAnHAaIMLUv8fLXzOtwtuzBaRRb4D6ne0IBaIiB31Ib3yChjTNiGSe0QLSgtjqBxfsg-342IXqJHXeGyXqEzqgLcIhR6-Y8On5AiYdeo27kiBS_B3F-eOdv6URxh6fLo0x3nLvypveEW1amRfPy=s0-d)