Personal blog that will cover my personal interests. I write about Christian Theology and Apologetics, politics, culture, science, and literature.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Truthbomb Apologetics: Counterpoints: John Loftus and Frank Turek on the Death of Christopher Hitchens
Over on Truthbomb Apologetics, Chad posted two comments regarding the death of Christopher Hitchens. I think he did something amazing: allowing us to see how one of Hitchens' fellow atheists looks at this and how a Christian - one of Hitchen's debate opponents - view the same man.
I usually follow Loftus' blog Debunking Christianity, but he seems to have abandoned it for another site (see the reference note from Chad below), but it's interesting that to Loftus, Hitchens was too good to burn in hell. I'd like to see his reasoning for that. But be that as it may, Frank Turek's comments show how Hitchen's death should be looked on and brings up a great point - God blesses us despite ourselves. Not because we deserve it - but because He is soo good. It's a striking contrast. Loftus is fixated on his perception of God's goodness (none of us are good enough to stand before a holy God), while Turek is focused on God's goodness. Notice how although he and Hitchens disagreed on a lot of things, Turek says nothing mean or derogatory. In the quote there isn't even speculation on Hitchen's eternal destiny. I think Turek's attitude, like Peter Hitchens' attitude, is the one we should have when looking at the life and legacy of Christopher Hitchens.
Truthbomb Apologetics: Counterpoints: John Loftus and Frank Turek on the Death of Christopher Hitchens
John Loftus: "Many Christians are thinking he’s burning in hell. Some others may even say this. But it is a disgrace to humanity to even think this abhorrent thought about such a brilliantly good man...this statement burns me up to no end. It is more repulsive than any thought I can conceive...may his memory live on. He has changed the world for the better." [1]
Frank Turek: "There is no one with whom I disagreed more who I admired so much. I don’t see how anyone who knew Christopher Hitchens could think that a man with such admirable qualities and talents was nothing more than a collection of chemicals– the product of unexplained random processes. Christopher’s intellect, wit, courage, and passion are evidence to me of a Divine Being– a Divine Being who loves human freedom so much that He would even allow the gifts He bestows to be used against Him." [2]
1. http://freethoughtblogs.com/loftus/2011/12/16/christopher-hitchens-is-now-burning-in-hell/
2. http://www.crossexamined.org/blog/?p=258
I usually follow Loftus' blog Debunking Christianity, but he seems to have abandoned it for another site (see the reference note from Chad below), but it's interesting that to Loftus, Hitchens was too good to burn in hell. I'd like to see his reasoning for that. But be that as it may, Frank Turek's comments show how Hitchen's death should be looked on and brings up a great point - God blesses us despite ourselves. Not because we deserve it - but because He is soo good. It's a striking contrast. Loftus is fixated on his perception of God's goodness (none of us are good enough to stand before a holy God), while Turek is focused on God's goodness. Notice how although he and Hitchens disagreed on a lot of things, Turek says nothing mean or derogatory. In the quote there isn't even speculation on Hitchen's eternal destiny. I think Turek's attitude, like Peter Hitchens' attitude, is the one we should have when looking at the life and legacy of Christopher Hitchens.
Truthbomb Apologetics: Counterpoints: John Loftus and Frank Turek on the Death of Christopher Hitchens
Related articles
- Christopher Hitchens: From Quote to Quote (manonmona.wordpress.com)
- CFI Mourns the Death of Christopher Hitchens (secularnewsdaily.com)
- Humanists Mourn Christopher Hitchens: Stalwart for Atheism (secularnewsdaily.com)
- Christopher Hitchens (geoffarnold.com)
Answering Muslims: Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari Condemns Freedom of Speech
David Wood asked a great question:
In my Opinion Freedom of Speech means that we protect everyone's right to say or write anything they want whether or not we agree with them - no matter how stupid it is. But that means that anyone else has the right to point out why it is stupid.
Answering Muslims: Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari Condemns Freedom of Speech
But what happens when Muslims themselves say that Islam doesn't allow Freedom of Speech? Should we call these Muslims "racists" or "Islamophobes"?
In my Opinion Freedom of Speech means that we protect everyone's right to say or write anything they want whether or not we agree with them - no matter how stupid it is. But that means that anyone else has the right to point out why it is stupid.
Answering Muslims: Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari Condemns Freedom of Speech
Answering Muslims: Pakistani Christians Face Alienation, Discrimination
It is good to remember that we have many Christians in the world today suffering because they refuse to give up Jesus.
Answering Muslims: Pakistani Christians Face Alienation, Discrimination
Answering Muslims: Pakistani Christians Face Alienation, Discrimination
Related articles
- Pakistani Christians Face Alienation, Discrimination This Christmas (foxnews.com)
- Pakistani Muslims attack Christians in attempt to force them to convert to Islam (via ANS News) (via The Christian Gazette) (wdednh.wordpress.com)
- Muslim groups see "minorities" quota as a googly (thehindu.com)
- Megachurch rises in Pakistani city of Karachi (seattletimes.nwsource.com)