Friday, July 10, 2009

Pictures Can Lie


A picture has been published showing Obama appearing to stare at behind of a young woman as she walked passed him. People were quick to think sexual harassment and then quickly moved to something even more horrible when it came out that the young woman is only a girl of 17. This event was in Italy at a Summit earlier this week. I posted the offending picture on the left. The thing is just taken by itself it does look like Obama is checking her out in a sexual matter. The press has dubbed it "rumpgate". Fortunately MSNBC has posted a video exonerating Obama because He was just helping a woman navigate the steps they were standing on. The video is below. As for the other man in the picture,Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France, i don't know what his excuse was. This just goes to show that photographs still need context to understand reality.



Answering Askegg via Twitter part 3

Askegg has responded to my response. Read that at blog. I thought that I would take the time to respond back. Again, my current words are in red.


After my last blog post to Marcus, he has responded:

For the past few days I have been…um…dialoguing with a person on twitter about the nature of God, evidence for his existence, and human free will. He felt compelled to write a full blog post in response to the discussion. I feel honored. He obviously put a lot of thought into it. I’ve decided to respond in kind. In addition this essay is a lot more respectful and articulate that some his tweets. My words will be in red and his will be in black.

I am not sure I put that much effort into it – it was essentially a stream of consciousness, which I did not even re-read once complete. Nevertheless, I appreciate the full blog post in response and will respond to your comments in turn.

I think for the purposes of our discussion we will continue to leave the Trinity out of the discussion and save it for some other time. This guy is the one who misunderstands. The son willingly gave himself for us as the propitiation for our sins and no one deserves it.

Many bright minds have delved the depths contained in the mystery of the trinity, and none have really come up with a definition or rational explanation. The essence of most modern Christian theology is that God, Jesus, and something called the “Holy Ghost” form three parts of the same god – something like ice, water, and steam are different representations of water.

On the surface, this explanation of the trinity seems to solve the riddle, that is until you remember that one part of god cursed us for all time for the horrendous crime of disobeying him, while the other died to pay the price of this transgression (although he came back to life, so it’s unclear what kind of sacrifice it really was).

This is basic one-o-one: there are not three gods. I'm not going to sit here and assert that I understand all of it, but that much you should know had you ever been a Christian. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not 3 Gods. There is only one God. One Being. One Essence. Father, Son, And Holy Spirit are three personalities in the one being. Here is an example. Would you answer the question "What Are You?" with the same answer as "Who ARE YOU?" God is one What - one BEING. God is three WHOs - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Read The Forgotten Trinity by James White. After re-reading this paragraph, I've decided to change it. Askegg did not say that the Trinity means 3 gods. However it's more than like, ice - water - and vapor. The truth is humans lack the neccessary tools to completely describe what God is. The Bible answers the question "who?" "What?" is still very much beyond us.

Let’s leave all that rubbish behind us because there is no solution to the conundrums it creates.

Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. – Hebrew 12:2

The other point is that Jesus did not die and stay dead He is alive. He rose.

So again I ask, what kind of sacrifice did Jesus make. He certainly did not lay down his life for us since, as you point out, “he is alive”. When you add in the dimension of omniscience, Jesus also knew he was going to die, and be risen again – so even entering into the whole sordid affair was just playing things out.

Yes, Jesus knew He was going to die. And He knew it was going to hurt. He also knew He did not deserve it. He know You and I deserve it. A sacrifice means giving up something that you don't have to give up. He chose to give up His life and pay for our sins. He paid the penalty of sin for us. That does not mean that He had to stay dead.

But God raised him from the dead, freeing him from the agony of death, because it was impossible for death to keep its hold on him. – Acts 2:24

I’m not ignoring the fact that many people are going to spend eternity in Hell. It bothers me. I don’t want anyone to go to Hell. That is why I want to tell everyone I can that God has provided us a way to escape the fate that will befall us without God’s intervention. God does not take joy in people going to hell.

God may not take joy in sending people to Hell, but he does it anyway. As I pointed out, there may have been an infinite ways to create a universe where people had free will and did NOT choose to rebel against God. Answer this simple question: “Is there free will in Heaven?”

If the answer is “yes”, then free will is not required for obedience or absolute happiness. If the answer is “no” then I submit that being turned into robotic automatons is not many people’s idea of Heaven.

Who says you are free now? We are in bondage to sin. You feel it. You know that. You look at the standard in the Bible for what Holiness looks like and you know you can never meet that. Jesus came to free us from our inability to live up to that. He didn't come to free us from that standard. Is there free will in Heaven? I don't know. What i do now it's gonna be better than what we got now.

I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” – Luke 5:32

The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. – 2 Peter 3:9

In heaven there is no reason to think that those in heaven will be able to see or know anything about the torture in Hell. Where is that in the Bible, just an appeal to emotion…no substance to the argument.

Hello Pot, this is Kettle.

You have spent a great deal of time detailing what will happen to me if I choose to reject Jesus and God – I will be pointed straight to hell. This is a clear appeal to emotion. Oh, I am scared of Hell so I better do as you say.

Unfortunately, Christians are not the only ones to use this bizarre tactic of al all loving God. Islam is the prime modern example who employ exactly the same low brow method of conversion. They also use appeals to incredulity, arguments from design, and just as many straw men. Ironically, these are all arguments for deist Gods, and not for one in-particular.

It’s nice to think that you will not have a few of Hell from your pearly seats in the Heavens. While it is true that the Bible does not answer these questions in any way (it answers precious few in reality), it does not rule out the possibility. Will you remember that billions will be living for eternity without God’s grace? Will God change your character so you won’t remember? If so, in what way will your soul still be you? If you can witness the suffering, doesn’t this detract from the joy you might feel?

Once again, the Bible is hopelessly inadequate to answer such questions, and you are just guessing if you try.

The Bible promises that on Judgement day we will see what complete justice and mercy looks like. No one will have any excuse. Everyone will know that God is right in everything He has done. The Bible also promises no tears and no suffering for those who are spending eternitiy with Him that means that we won't be witnessing the suffering of those who are in Hell. This isn't conjecture this is what the Bible teaches. If you want take issue with, you have to take it up with God. I didn't write it. Another thing is true repentence comes from responding to the love of God not from the fear of hell and eternal punishiment.

Andrew, you are missing one very important point. How would you know that any of us would exist if God had not allowed this kind of universe, neither you nor your children would exist as you exist now.

This is irrelevant. A God could well have chosen not to create anything, thereby eliminating the need for anyone to suffer at all.

If he had created nothing then there would be no us to wonder about these things so it is relevent. Saying it's not dodges the point I made...insufficiently

God has a purpose in choosing this universe rather than another. I don’t know what it is.

So the question remains – what kind of divine plan requires the eternal suffering of a good portion of his creation? I am sure you believe there is some ultimate plan which mandates God ignoring many of his children, but I fail to see how an all loving deity could inflict such pain when there may have been numerous alternatives open to him.

I don't know...and no one can answer that, The Bible teaches that God ignores no one. If God ignore someone they'd cease to exist. Good thing He doesn't blink. He chose to create this way. to complain and argue about it is like a clay pot arguing with the sculpturer that made it.

However, I do know that God has only good intentions for His creation and not one of us knows enough of what’s going on to challenge the decisions He has made. How do you know that things would not have been worse had God not allowed another universe? We don’t.

I agree – we don’t know things would not have been worse, or better for that matter. On the spectrum of possible universes I am sure there are a great number of universes worse than this one, and a great number much better. I do not need to provide evidence that this is actually the case, but the mere suggestion is enough to raise the possibility. It seems logical that an omnipotent being would be able to choose from an infinite number of possible realities – perhaps he has actually created them all through the power of his thought alone? Who knows?

Judging from what the Bible actually says there was no better universe. That doesn't mean there could not have been a universe that you or I would have liked better but this is the oine we have.

That’s what being a Christian is about. Trusting God even if we don’t know what the whole masterpiece looks like.

Well that’s great, but you have no idea if you are actually trusting an entity who exists outside of space and time, or a mere figment of your imagination.

You still havern't proved that God does not exist.

Another attempt to use emotion rather than logic. This analogy does not fit where humanity is spiritually before coming to Christ. People who end up in hell are not Children of God (Joun1;1 John 3).

Fancy footwork and playing with words does not alter the fact that, according to your antiquated theology, we are ALL children of God. Some he has preordained to spend the rest of their days without his love. Who does that?

God can do whatever He wants to do. He will have mercy on whom He willl have mercy. Read Romans 9.

The other things asking why would God not lower the price of sin to something less severe is a silly idea. Lowering the bar for righteousness is not Justice. It’s about the character of God that sets the bar. Righteous is who He is. To lower the standard would be going against himself. Even our own secular wisdom says: “To your own self be true”. Why shouldn’t God do the same? As for disease and pain and suffering God has a purpose and I don’t know what it all is yet, but God promises in His Word that.

Who says? Who are you to decide what is justice? Apparently God decides what is just and what is not, and I am sure he could decide to grace us all with his love should he choose. You may not think this is fair because you have tried to live a good Christian life (whatever that means) and tried to do all the right things. How could it be fair that someone who has lead a life of hedonistic pleasure be granted a free pass into Heaven – they have not controlled themselves. You have denied yourself pleasure in this life to attain the promise of pleasure in some afterlife for which there is no evidence.

No where does God say that anyone, who has the opportunity to accept/reject Christ, get a free pass to heaven. The truth is i have been given too much information...too much light....to get a free pass. He isn't going to give me a free pass. I'm going to have to live the way He says because I belong to Him. Jesus paid a high price and being aware of that and accepting that brings consequences just as rejecting if bring awful consequences. I'm getting this from the Bible which you can't prove to be false.

For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,

Actually, this line of thinking is only prevalent because the Emperor of Rome backed the Pauline position that Jesus was both human and divine, then proceeded to suppress the two main competing views.

Um no, This was written well before the Nicea Council. Show me how how I have misconstrued what the Bible says.

The Marcionites believed that Jesus was purely divine and not human at all – his humanity was an illusion, a phantasm. They believed Jehovah created this world as detailed in the Old Testament, and the One True God was so disgusted with his behaviour that he sent part of his soul (Jesus) to pay for the souls of those Jehovah tortured in Hell, thus saving them.

The Adoptionists believed that Jesus was fully human, but adopted by the Biblical God at his baptism (hence the name). Jesus’s soul escaped his human body at the crucifixion. Mohammed seized upon this idea and claimed himself to be adopted by God to preach his word, thus founding the religion of Islam.

Gnosticism sure sucks

Both were almost completely wiped out when the Romans used their military might to squash opposing views. These are a matter of historical record.

Also interesting that neither of them are supported in the Bible either. Could God had somehow intervened to maskes sure those ideas were squashed? Yes He did.

and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority. In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature, not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead.

When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.

Ahhh…. what?

No, I never said that Free Will comes into this at all. I’m not suggesting that our will trumps God’s at all. I reject that humans have free will in that God must do anything according to our will.

I was not saying that either. I do not hold that our “free will” could trump God’s, or that an omniscient creator must somehow bend to our will. What I proposed it that God would have known our all of our decisions at the beginning of time. He can foresee the future stretching out before him like a well known movie. He knows all the characters moves, their motivations. He knows each frame of the movie in intricate detail. The characters in the movie (us) believe we have free will, but it’s an illusion. God knows exactly how it is going to end, and how the whole series will play out.

Okay, that is similar to how I look at it...almost. The future is not something that God just knows about. It's something that he controls and guides.

We do have will. We do have desires but they are subject to God’s ultimate will. And don’t forget we all go to Hell by default until we turn to God. Now how does that happen? How does God do that? Why doesn’t He do that for everyone? No man can say…least of all me. All I know is if you haven’t turned to God in total submisson and obedience you do not belong to Him.

Sigh. And God created me not to belong to him. How does that fit with the notion of “all loving”?

No where in the Bible does it say that God created anyone to not believe in Him. The Bible says we all know, some of us deny it. Look at Romans 1 and see if you do not see western society being described.

Sorry to break it to you. We do choose, but not because of anything in us or from us. Read Romans 9. However the conclusion you draw is stupid. You are not free from sin and death until you come to God. Before that you are in slavery to sin. If you want to be free you got to go to Jesus. That is what the Bible teaches.

I am well aware of what the Bible teaches. It says we are born sick and commanded to be well. We were created with the capacity for sin and tempted by a talking snake, then every descendant was cursed by your all loving god to live miserable lives until God came back to Earth to kill himself to pay for the sin he created in the first place. It’s totally crazy, but you believe whatever floats your boat.

Would you rather pay for your sins? And God is not responsible for Adam disobeying. We curse ourselves leading to death. When God cursed Adam it had nothing to do with hell. Instead God promised Adam that God was going to redeem humanity. This is what Jesus did and does.

Complaining about the fact that God has selects whom he has mercy on is silly. If you want to be saved then God has called you to be saved. If you don’t then He didn’t and you don’t want to be saved anyway.

That’s one of my main points – you can worship a being who would have known which individuals would “chose” to reject him (after all, he created us this way), then turn around and say it was somehow a choice of free will.

I never said that God says that it's a free will choice. You keep putting free will in where it does not belong.

For the last time – free will is an illusion to an omniscient being. If you know the results of your actions, and the subsequent results extending forever into the future, then you are completely paralysed. There is no “choice” God could make in which he did not know the outcome – indeed you would have to ask the question what drives a being to do anything, especially when you consider his apparent unlimited power.

You are arguing a point that I never made.

Andrew, why do you think that is what Hell will be like. Nothing in the Bible talks about the torture you describe. Stick to the text please.

Better read your Bible again, mate.

Where does it say that "white hot pokers shoved into their eyes and their intestines gnawed by rats"? What Book, chapter, and verse? Sounds like you are confusing Dante's Divine Comedy with the Bible.

The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth – Matthew 13:41-42

If thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire. – Matthew 18:8

Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. – Matthew 22:13

Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels. … And these shall go away into everlasting punishment. – Matthew 25:41, 46

into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. – Mark 9:43-48

The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. – John 5:28

In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction. – 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9

The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever. – Revelations 14:10

And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever – Revelations 20:10

And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. – Revelation 20:14-15

Care to comment on those?

Yes, Hell will suck and I'm not going because Jesus paid for my sins on the cross so I don't has to go. Now, I'd be way more worried about these verses if I were you.

You cannot interfere with your children’s free will, but God can and does. He is in complete control of everything. Sometime he restrains what we do and sometimes He doesn’t. For reasons and purpose we don’t fully understand He works out the reality we experience. Your analogy fails because it attempts to explain something so infinite in finite terms that cannot possibly measure up.

So just like God I can decide when to interfere with my daughters “free will” and when not too. When they are in clear danger and I chose not to act, what does that make me? What does it make your God when he choses not to act?

You don't actively interfere in everyone of your daughters decisions even if you know that sometimes it will cause them pain. If you did, they would never learn from failure. They would never grow. God does the same with us.

Jesus substantiated that claim when He walked out of that tomb with all power in His hand.

There is no credible evidence that this ever happened. You have the stories of less than a handful of people written decades after to supposed event. It’s no more believable than “Jack and the Beanstalk”.

There is plenty evidence that the gospel account is the best explanation for the facts that we know.

We’ve been through this in Twitter. I’ve presented links to you for evidence for the resurrection and yet you haven’t provided a shred of rebuttal for rejecting the fact that Jesus is what He said. All other religions deny this. Every single one of them. Hell is not a scare tactic. I serve God not because I’m afraid of goint to hell but because I love Him because He first loved me.

So your not in the least bit scared of Hell?

No, I'm not. i'm not going to hell because i put my faith in Christ. If you are sacare of helll you need to go to God and repent. He will save you too.

I’m not better than anyone else. He has done nothing but show me love and kindness my whole life. Why would I not serve Him? He deserves it. Even if he had never done a thing for me other than allow my birth, I owe Him everything. You owe Him also. It’s irrational to avoid the evidence just because you don’t like where it points.

I agree with this – let the evidence speak for itself. So far, you certainly have not shown any evidence there was actually a resurrection – no one ever has, because there is none. Zero. Not a damn thing. You have given vague Biblical quotes without first providing evidence the Bible is even true. Geez, even if parts of the Bible are true does not make it all true. “Gone with the Wind” is not a true story just because there was a civil war.

All you have to do is prove the Bible false and my who arguement collapases. This you have failed to do.

You agreed with me that the standards God asks us to meet according to the Bible are too high for any person to attain.

Can you control your thoughts? If you have ever lusted after someone you have committed adultery in your heart, which is expressly forbidden in the 10 commandments (which are the first of a list of around 60). The standards are impossible.

That is why we need Jesus.

I agree. That is why Jesus came. He made up the difference for us. He lived the life we can’t. Just like Adam damned us all through His disobedience, Jesus saves us through His obedience, life, sacrifice, and resurrection. All we have to do is accept it. IF you can’t accept it, it isn’t because God rejected you. It is because you have rejected Him

Eve was tricked first – why do I know more about your religion than you do?

You know nothing. The Bible says Eve was tricked. Adam was not tricked. He knew what he was doing. Eve thought that she was doing the right thing. Adam damned us. It wasn't on Eve.

Dude, It’s been 2000 years (5000 yrs or more if you count the Old Testament) …

You know how they calculated that fucked up number of a 6,000 year old Earth? They added the ages of the people in the Bible together. That’s it. That’s all they did. How scientific and reliable is that? I mean really?

You are right. That is not how you get a good number. I only used that number because It seems to me that the Old Testament only covers that amount not that it is the age of the earth. The Bible does not claim that the geneologies in Genesis give the names and ages of everyone. Remember what I tweeted earlier: hebrew geneologies are not exhaustive. They only hit the high points. If this bothers you..the fault is in how people have used the Bible not in the Bible itself.

… and Christianity is sitll growing and people are still coming to Jesus.

People are still flocking to Islam, so what? Even more people are shedding their superstitious believes and living full, happy, lives.

The point os that you tried to assert that Christianity and all religions will die out, but I countereed you. Glad you agree with me.

God loves you and desire a relationship with you. Seek Him and be truly free. As a parting point, I’m not suggesting that Babies go to hell and that a person would need to absolutely know about Jesus to be saved. I was talking about people who are alive now and have an opportunity to know who Jesus is. Babies go back to God automatically if they die (see 2 Samuel 12:22-24 for an example of what happens when a Baby dies).

You have no way of knowing this is true.

If 2 Samuel 12:22-24 is true then I know it's true. Prove it isn't.

I think what is more important is the realization that there were a lot of people who lived and died and yet we believe they are in heaven and did not have access to the the same knowledge of Jesus as we do now (see Hebrews 11). These men and women just followed after God with what they knew at the time. Jesus also said that all those who seek him would find him. I believe that this is true no matter what. So that anwers the problem of those who aren’t born into Christianity or were born before Christ came. I’m sure that there were billions of people born before Christ will also be in heaven.

Jesus said “I am the way, the truth, and the light. No one gets to the Father except through me.” Seem to me that all those before he appeared on the scene are doomed since they did not have a chance to know Jesus.

No, not according to the Bible. The patriarchs and all the heroes and heroines of the Old Testament are saved the same way we are today: trusting in what God has made known to us. We just have a fuller picture than they did.

In any case, if these billions of people before Jesus appeared do automatically get into Heaven, then how is that fair to the billions who came afterwards? How come babies get a free pass before they even have a chance to form a coherent thought? Earlier you were talking about a God of justice, yet here we have examples of him metering out celestial justice in grossly unfair ways.

I still maintain your God, if he existed, would be a total monster and not worthy of any worship.

God can do what ever he wants. He can give mercy however He wants to give it. The point is that if you want to get that mercy you have an opportunity because you know about Jesus. What you do with that is what you will be accountable for to God.

Repsonse to " Why Jesus could not be the messiah of the Old Testament"

I have been engaged in some apologetics discussion on Twitter of late. I've been challenge by OlderMusicGeek who says that Jesus does not fulfill Old Testament prophecy for the Messiah. I asked him to provide a prophecy that Jesus did not fulfill and he sent me this link to
Why Jesus could not be the messiah of the Old Testament By and large this article is inferior to the one I refuted in yesterday's post. So since I answered almost everyone of these yesterday, I will savbe my comments to the end and reiterate the most important points.

Christians are fond of claiming that Jesus fulfilled Old Testament messianic prophecies. But as we mentioned above in Argument # 3, the writers of the New Testament books often twisted verses from the Old Testament that had nothing to do with messianic prophecies, to try to make them fit into Jesus’ story. (In my opinion, that was very disrespectful to the Old Testament writers.) It was as though the Gospel advocates of the New Testament were desperate to look for anything in the Old Testament to try to fit their concept of Jesus as the messiah into it. In effect, it was a sort of “forced sequel.” Anyone who merely looks at the alleged Old Testament prophecies can see this. It’s quite obvious.

However, not only does Jesus not fit the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament scriptures, but what most Christians don’t know and are never told, is that Jesus also did not fulfill the actual intended messianic prophecies of the Old Testament and Torah! You see, Old Testament prophesized a messiah (or “moshiach” as modern Jews like to call it) who would re-establish the national kingdom of Israel as a nation, making it the powerful center of the world. This leader would live and thrive in the world, not die on the cross for our sins. That was never part of the plan! On the other hand, the concept of a messiah as savior and redeemer of the world is a Christian concept. This is explained by a section from a Judaism website:

http://www.jewfaq.org/moshiach.htm

“The word "moshiach" does not mean "savior." The notion of an innocent, divine or semi-divine being who will sacrifice himself to save us from the consequences of our own sins is a purely Christian concept that has no basis in Jewish thought. Unfortunately, this Christian concept has become so deeply ingrained in the English word "messiah" that this English word can no longer be used to refer to the Jewish concept. The word "moshiach" will be used throughout this page.”

In that same site, the prophecies about what the “moshiach” will do are explained:

“The moshiach will be a great political leader descended from King David (Jeremiah 23:5). The moshiach is often referred to as "moshiach ben David" (moshiach, son of David). He will be well-versed in Jewish law, and observant of its commandments. (Isaiah 11:2-5) He will be a charismatic leader, inspiring others to follow his example. He will be a great military leader, who will win battles for Israel. He will be a great judge, who makes righteous decisions (Jeremiah 33:15). But above all, he will be a human being, not a god, demi-god or other supernatural being………….

The moshiach will bring about the political and spiritual redemption of the Jewish people by bringing us back to Israel and restoring Jerusalem (Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 23:8; 30:3; Hosea 3:4-5). He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of all world government, both for Jews and gentiles (Isaiah 2:2-4; 11:10; 42:1). He will rebuild the Temple and re-establish its worship (Jeremiah 33:18). He will restore the religious court system of Israel and establish Jewish law as the law of the land (Jeremiah 33:15).”

And according to that site on Jewish tradition, here is what this “moshiach” will bring to the world when he arrives:

Olam Ha-Ba: The Messianic Age

The world after the messiah comes is often referred to in Jewish literature as Olam Ha-Ba (oh-LAHM hah-BAH), the World to Come. This term can cause some confusion, because it is also used to refer to a spiritual afterlife. In English, we commonly use the term "messianic age" to refer specifically to the time of the messiah.

Olam Ha-Ba will be characterized by the peaceful co-existence of all people. (Isaiah 2:4) Hatred, intolerance and war will cease to exist. Some authorities suggest that the laws of nature will change, so that predatory beasts will no longer seek prey and agriculture will bring forth supernatural abundance (Isaiah 11:6-11:9). Others, however, say that these statements are merely an allegory for peace and prosperity.

All of the Jewish people will return from their exile among the nations to their home in Israel (Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 23:8; 30:3; Hosea 3:4-5). The law of the Jubilee will be reinstated.

In the Olam Ha-Ba, the whole world will recognize the Jewish G-d as the only true G-d, and the Jewish religion as the only true religion (Isaiah 2:3; 11:10; Micah 4:2-3; Zechariah 14:9). There will be no murder, robbery, competition or jealousy. There will be no sin (Zephaniah 3:13). Sacrifices will continue to be brought in the Temple, but these will be limited to thanksgiving offerings, because there will be no further need for expiatory offerings.”

Obviously the Jesus of Christianity did not fulfill these requirements, contrary to what the church teaches. Instead, what the Christians do is take the prophecies that Jesus didn’t fulfill and try to claim that he will fulfill them in his future Second Coming. Nice try, but no cigar. The Judaism site addresses Jesus:

“What About Jesus?

Jews do not believe that Jesus was the moshiach. Assuming that he existed, and assuming that the Christian scriptures are accurate in describing him (both matters that are debatable), he simply did not fulfill the mission of the moshiach as it is described in the biblical passages cited above. Jesus did not do any of the things that the scriptures said the messiah would do.

On the contrary, another Jew born about a century later came far closer to fulfilling the messianic ideal than Jesus did. His name was Shimeon ben Kosiba, known as Bar Kochba (son of a star), and he was a charismatic, brilliant, but brutal warlord. Rabbi Akiba, one of the greatest scholars in Jewish history, believed that Bar Kochba was the moshiach. Bar Kochba fought a war against the Roman Empire, catching the Tenth Legion by surprise and retaking Jerusalem. He resumed sacrifices at the site of the Temple and made plans to rebuild the Temple. He established a provisional government and began to issue coins in its name. This is what the Jewish people were looking for in a moshiach; Jesus clearly does not fit into this mold. Ultimately, however, the Roman Empire crushed his revolt and killed Bar Kochba. After his death, all acknowledged that he was not the moshiach.”

For more detailed answers, another Jewish site entitled Jews for Judaism (http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/) provides explanations for the real Jewish messiah and why Jesus didn’t match the criteria. In this section of the site the “Second Coming” theory to try to reconcile the messianic prophecies is refuted:

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general-messiah-jewishresponse.html

“9) The claim that Jesus will fulfill the Messianic prophesies when he returns does not give him any credibility for his “first” coming. The Bible never speaks about the Messiah returning after an initial appearance. The “second coming” theory is a desperate attempt to explain away Jesus’ failure. The Biblical passages which Christians are forced to regard as second coming (#5 above) don’t speak of someone returning, they have a “first coming” perspective.”

Also from the Jews for Judaism site, is a great handbook for dealing with and responding to Christian missionaries who try to convert them. You can read the handbook online at:

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/handbook/s_messiah.html

In it, the criteria for the true Jewish messiah are given:

“THE CRITERIA TO BE FULFILLED BY THE JEWISH MESSIAH

In an accurate translation of the Jewish Scriptures, the word "Moshiach" is never translated as "Messiah," but as "anointed."1Nevertheless, Judaism has always maintained a fundamental belief in a Messianic figure. Since the concept of a Messiah is one that was given by G-d to the Jews, Jewish tradition is best qualified to describe and recognize the expected Messiah. This tradition has its foundation in numerous biblical references, many of which are cited below. Judaism understands the Messiah to be a human being (with no connotation of deity or divinity) who will bring about certain changes in the world and who must fulfill certain specific criteria before being acknowledged as the Messiah.

These specific criteria are as follows:

1) He must be Jewish. (Deuteronomy 17:15, Numbers 24:17)

2) He must be a member of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10) and a direct male descendent of both King David (I Chronicles 17:11, Psalm 89:29-38, Jeremiah 33:17, II Samuel 7:12-16) and King Solomon. (I Chronicles 22:10, II Chronicles 7:18)

3) He must gather the Jewish people from exile and return them to Israel. (Isaiah 27:12-13, Isaiah 11:12)

4) He must rebuild the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. (Micah 4:1)

5) He must bring world peace. (Isaiah 2:4, Isaiah 11:6, Micah 4:3)

6) He must influence the entire world to acknowledge and serve one G-d. (Isaiah 11:9, Isaiah 40:5, Zephaniah 3:9)

All of these criteria for the Messiah are best stated in the book of Ezekiel chapter 37:24-28:

"And My servant David will be a king over them, and they will all have one shepherd, and they will walk in My ordinances, and keep My statutes, and observe them, and they shall live on the land that I gave to Jacob My servant...and I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant and I will set my sanctuary in their midst forever and My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their G-d and they will be My people. And the nations will know that I am the Lord who sanctifies Israel, when My sanctuary is in their midst forever."

If an individual fails to fulfill even one of these conditions, he cannot be the Messiah.”

Finally, in the next section of the handbook, a funny story is given that illustrates how the New Testament writers created Jesus’ fulfilled prophecies.

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/handbook/s_refuting.html

“While traveling through a forest, a person noticed a circle marked on a tree with an arrow shot perfectly into the center. A few yards away he noticed several more targets, each with arrows in the center. Later, he met the talented archer and he asked him, "How did you become such an expert that you always get your arrows into the center of the bull's-eye?" "It's not difficult," responded the archer, "First I shoot the arrow and then I draw the circle."”

Jesus did fulfill the "suffering servant" messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. Pure and Simple. And the ones about King and Lord, restoring Israel, and all the triumphant political and natural victories will see their fulfillment in the second coming. This artictle picks at the prophecies yet to be fulfilled and doesn't touch on the more than 200 prophecies that Jesus has already fulfilled. Prophecies that in no way one person could fulfill them all by coincidence. One such prophecy is that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem. Was Bar Kochban born in Bethtlehem? I can find nothing that says he was. Jesus was! How can the one who this article is waiting for going to fulfill Isaiah 523 and Psalm 22? I mean the Messiah has to fulfill all of them!


Here is my list of links
http://www.konig.org/messianic.htm
http://www.bprc.org/topics/fulfill.html

Why You Should Be A Christian. Response to Richard Carrier Pt 2/6


A well-written essay is on the internet called, "Why I am Not Christian" by Richard Carrier (on the left). It's long, respectful, and well written. It compels a response. His criticisms of Christians are well founded but his charges against God are mistaken and unfounded. The essay was written in 2006 and is divided into six parts. I'm going to interact with his responses and divide my essay also into six parts. His words will be in black and mine will be red. His Top four reasons for rejecting Christianity are: 1. God is Silent. 2. God is inert. 3. Inadequate evidence for God. 4. Christianity predicts a different universe. Here is my refutation of point 1.

1. God is Silent

If God wants something from me, he would tell me. He wouldn't leave someone else to do this, as if an infinite being were short on time. And he would certainly not leave fallible, sinful humans to deliver an endless plethora of confused and contradictory messages. God would deliver the message himself, directly, to each and every one of us, and with such clarity as the most brilliant being in the universe could accomplish. We would all hear him out and shout "Eureka!" So obvious and well-demonstrated would his message be. It would be spoken to each of us in exactly those terms we would understand. And we would all agree on what that message was. Even if we rejected it, we would all at least admit to each other, "Yes, that's what this God fellow told me."[2]

God does tells us what He wants. It's in the Bible. The problem is not that the messages are contradictory or garbled it's that people do reject it and substitute their own ideas. The Bible does make sense if you read it. If I have a thought or idealology that conflicts with something that the Bible plainly says, then I have to make a choice. Am I going to accept the Word of God, or am I going to go by what I think. Sometimes people do what they think.


Excuses don't fly. The Christian proposes that a supremely powerful being exists who wants us to set things right, and therefore doesn't want us to get things even more wrong. This is an intelligible hypothesis, which predicts there should be no more confusion about which religion or doctrine is true than there is about the fundamentals of medicine, engineering, physics, chemistry, or even meteorology. It should be indisputably clear what God wants us to do, and what he doesn't want us to do. Any disputes that might still arise about that would be as easily and decisively resolved as any dispute between two doctors, chemists, or engineers as to the right course to follow in curing a patient, identifying a chemical, or designing a bridge. Yet this is not what we observe. Instead, we observe exactly the opposite: unresolvable disagreement and confusion. That is clearly a failed prediction. A failed prediction means a false theory. Therefore, Christianity is false.

The assertion that a "failed prediction means a false theory" is true. And I clearly agree that the prediction Carrier makes is false. The problem is that prediction is not based on the Bible, therefore it is not what Christians believe. Carrier suggest that God's purpose is for human being to set things right and not mess things up any further. God tells us in His Word that only He can set things right. All we can do is mess things up. Why would He leave it in our hands. Jeremiah 17:9, 10 says:

9 The heart is deceitful above all things
and beyond cure.
Who can understand it?

10 "I the LORD search the heart
and examine the mind,
to reward a man according to his conduct,
according to what his deeds deserve."


In John 3:16-21, Jesus Says

16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,f]">[f] that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.g]">[g] 19This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. 21But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."h]">[h]


Jesus is clear. It's not that people don't have enough evidence. They reject what they have.

Typically, Christians try to make excuses for God that protect our free will. Either the human will is more powerful than the will of God, and therefore can actually block his words from being heard despite all his best and mighty efforts, or God cares more about our free choice not to hear him than about saving our souls, and so God himself "chooses" to be silent. Of course, there is no independent evidence of either this remarkable human power to thwart God, or this peculiar desire in God, and so this is a completely "ad hoc" theory: something just "made up" out of thin air in order to rescue the actual theory that continually fails to fit the evidence. But for reasons I'll explore later, such "added elements" are never worthy of belief unless independently confirmed: you have to know they are true. You can't just "claim" they are true. Truth is not invented. It can only be discovered. Otherwise, Christianity is just a hypothesis that has yet to find sufficient confirmation in actual evidence.
Carrier is right here. I disagree that human free will should be protected. It makes no sense. We can't block God or stop God from doing what He wants to do. God does not care about our free will more than saving our souls. No one can truly say he/she understand why God just doesn't force everyone to do what He desires and do no evil. I don't have answer for that. But God is not silent on the issue.

14What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15For he says to Moses,
"I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."f]">[f] 16It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. 17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."g]">[g] 18Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

19One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" 20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "h]">[h] 21Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?

22What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction? 23What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory— 24even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles? - Romans 9:14-21
God tells us in the Bible that there are things that we are not just going to understand (see Isaiah 55: 6-11

6 Seek the LORD while he may be found;
call on him while he is near.

7 Let the wicked forsake his way
and the evil man his thoughts.
Let him turn to the LORD, and he will have mercy on him,
and to our God, for he will freely pardon.

8 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,"
declares the LORD.

9 "As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.

10 As the rain and the snow
come down from heaven,
and do not return to it
without watering the earth
and making it bud and flourish,
so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater,

11 so is my word that goes out from my mouth:
It will not return to me empty,
but will accomplish what I desire
and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.

And see Deuteronomy 29:29:

The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.


Be that as it may. Though "maybe, therefore probably" is not a logical way to arrive at any belief, let's assume the Christian can somehow "prove" (with objective evidence everyone can agree is relevant and true) that we have this power or God has this desire. Even on that presumption, there are unsolvable problems with this "additional" hypothesis. Right from the start, it fails to explain why believers disagree. The fact that believers can't agree on the content of God's message or desires also refutes the theory that he wants us to be clear on these things. This failed prediction cannot be explained away by any appeal to free will--for these people have chosen to hear God, and not only to hear him, but to accept Jesus Christ as the shepherd of their very soul. So no one can claim these people chose not to hear God. Therefore, either God is telling them different things, or there is no God. Even if there is a God, but he is deliberately sowing confusion, this contradicts what Christianity predicts to be God's desire, which entails Christianity is the wrong religion. Either way, Christianity is false.
God is not the author of confusion so the problem is not with the message. The issue is with the people receiving the message. We use our own predilections and bias and force them on scripture. So much so that people choose to stop listening to God. They would rather lean on their understanding rather than do the extra work of study and honest prayer.

So this theory doesn't work. It fails to predict what we actually observe. But even considering atheists like me, this "ad hoc" excuse still fails to save Christianity from the evidence. When I doubted the Big Bang theory, I voiced the reasons for my doubts but continued to pursue the evidence, frequently speaking with several physicists who were "believers." Eventually, they presented all the logic and evidence in terms I understood, and I realized I was wrong: the Big Bang theory is well-supported by the evidence and is at present the best explanation of all the facts by far. Did these physicists violate my free will? Certainly not. I chose to pursue the truth and hear them out. So, too, I and countless others have chosen to give God a fair hearing--if only he would speak. I would listen to him even now, at this very moment. Yet he remains silent. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that I am "choosing" not to hear him. And therefore, the fact that he still does not speak refutes the hypothesis. Nothing about free will can save the theory here.


Christianity has nothing to do with free will. It's not about us. It's about God and what he wants to do. If you have not studied the Bible and checked it out, then you haven't given God a fair hearing.

Even when we might actually credit free will with resisting God's voice--like the occasional irrational atheist, or the stubbornly mistaken theist--the Christian theory is still not compatible with the premise that God would not or could not overcome this resistance. Essential to the Christian hypothesis, as C.S. Lewis says, is the proposition that God is "quite definitely good" and "loves love and hates hatred." Unless these statements are literally meaningless, they entail that God would behave like anyone else who is "quite definitely good" and "loves love and hates hatred." And such people don't give up on someone until their resistance becomes intolerable--until then, they will readily violate someone's free will to save them, because they know darned well it is the right thing to do. God would do the same. He would not let the choice of a fallible, imperfect being thwart his own good will.
I don't like this analogy. It assumes that because God is good He is obligated to save everyone. He is not obligated to save anyone. We all deserve to go to Hell and be eternally separated from God. It is because God's grace we get mercy! Neither grace nor mercy can be extorted or demanded. They can only be received. God's definition of "good" does not match the world's definition.

I know this for a fact. Back in my days as a flight-deck firefighter, when our ship's helicopter was on rescue missions, we had to stand around in our gear in case of a crash. There was usually very little to do, so we told stories. One I heard was about a rescue swimmer. She had to pull a family out of the water from a capsized boat, but by the time the chopper got there, it appeared everyone had drowned except the mother, who was for that reason shedding her life vest and trying to drown herself. The swimmer dove in to rescue her, but she kicked and screamed and yelled to let her die. She even gave the swimmer a whopping black eye. But the swimmer said to hell with that, I'm bringing you in! And she did, enduring her curses and blows all the way.
Later, it turned out that one of the victim's children, her daughter, had survived. She had drifted pretty far from the wreck, but the rescue team pulled her out, and the woman who had beaten the crap out of her rescuer apologized and thanked her for saving her against her will. Everyone in my group agreed the rescue swimmer had done the right thing, and we all would have done the same--because that is what a loving, caring being does. It follows that if God is a loving being, he will do no less for us. In the real world, kind people don't act like some stubborn, pouting God who abandons the drowning simply because they don't want to be helped. They act like this rescue swimmer. They act like us.
God does change our will when he saves us. He replaces a heart of stone with a heart of flesh so that we can choose to follow him. The analogy is faulty. Jesus is like the rescue worker saving people who are drowning and don't know that they are drowning. God does not pout over those who are lost because they did not stop Him from saving them. He chooses and selects. All those He chooses to save will be saved.

So we can be certain God would make sure he told everyone, directly, what his message was. Everyone would then know what God had told them. They can still reject it all they want, and God can leave them alone. But there would never be, in any possible Christian universe, any confusion or doubt as to what God's message was. And if we had questions, God himself would answer them--just like the Big Bang physicists who were so patient with me. Indeed, the very fact that God gave the same message and answers to everyone would be nearly insurmountable proof that Christianity was true. Provided we had no reason to suspect God of lying to all of us, Christianity would be as certain as the law of gravity or the color of the sky. That is what the Christian hypothesis entails we should observe--for it is what a good and loving God would do, who wanted us all to set right what has gone wrong. And since this is not what we observe, but in fact the exact opposite, the evidence quite soundly refutes Christianity.
How do you know that God tells everyone all of the message and all at the same time? He doesn't. Assuming that because He doesn't is He doesn't say anything is false. Why assume that this is what a "good and loving" god would do? The Bible states that none of us has all of the message.

11When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. 12Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.

13And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love. - 1 Corinthians 13:11-13


Despite this conclusion, Christians still try to hold on to their faith with this nonsense about free will--but they haven't thought it through. Meteorologists can disagree about the weather forecast, but they all agree how weather is made and the conditions that are required for each kind of weather to arise. And they agree about this because the scientific evidence is so vast and secure that it resolves these questions, often decisively. It can't be claimed that God has violated the free will of meteorologists by providing them with all this evidence. And yet how much more important is salvation than the physics of weather! If God wants what Christianity says he wants, he would not violate our free will to educate us on the trivial and then refuse to do the same for the most important subject of all. Likewise, if a doctor wants a patient to get well, he is not vague about how he must do this, but as clear as can be. He explains what is needed in terms the patient can understand. He even answers the patient's questions, and whenever asked will present all the evidence for and against the effectiveness of the treatment. He won't hold anything back and declare, "I'm not going to tell you, because that would violate your free will!" Nor would any patient accept such an excuse--to the contrary, he would respond, "But I choose to hear you," leaving the doctor no such excuse.


God has clearly stated what the problem is: Sin. Complaining about how He has chosen to deliver the message of salvation and the remedy is silly. We have to trust God. He does tell us regardless of our free will. The Gospel will go out over the whole world and continue.


There can't be any excuse for God, either. There are always disagreements, and there are always people who don't follow what they are told or what they know to be true. But that doesn't matter. Chemists all agree on the fundamental facts of chemistry. Doctors all agree on the fundamental facts of medicine. Engineers all agree on the fundamental facts of engineering. So why can't all humans agree on the fundamental facts of salvation? There is no more reason that they should be confused or in the dark about this than that chemists, doctors, and engineers should be confused or in the dark.
Engineers and scientist do not agree on conclusions and facts. They argue constantly. There are plenty of confusions. Just because people claiming to be Christians don't agree on the message or how to live does not matter. Some of us are wrong about somethings and some of us are right on somethings.

13Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in your brother's way. 14As one who is in the Lord Jesus, I am fully convinced that no foodb]">[b] is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for him it is unclean. 15If your brother is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy your brother for whom Christ died. 16Do not allow what you consider good to be spoken of as evil. 17For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, 18because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and approved by men.

19Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. 20Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. 21It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.

22So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the man who does not condemn himself by what he approves. 23But the man who has doubts is condemned if he eats, because his eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin. - Romans 14:13-23

The logically inevitable fact is, if the Christian God existed, we would all hear from God himself the same message of salvation, and we would all hear, straight from God, all the same answers to all the same questions. The Chinese would have heard it. The Native Americans would have heard it. Everyone today, everywhere on Earth, would be hearing it, and their records would show everyone else in history had heard it, too. Sure, maybe some of us would still balk or reject that message. But we would still have the information. Because the only way to make an informed choice is to have the required information. So a God who wanted us to make an informed choice would give us all the information we needed, and not entrust fallible, sinful, contradictory agents to convey a confused mess of ambiguous, poorly supported claims. Therefore, the fact that God hasn't spoken to us directly, and hasn't given us all the same, clear message, and the same, clear answers, is enough to prove Christianity false.


God has spoken to the whole human race and puts us where we need to be so that we can best find him. I don't know how He does that for everyone but He certainly did it for me.

24"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. 25And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else. 26From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. 27God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. 28'For in him we live and move and have our being.' As some of your own poets have said, 'We are his offspring.' - Act 17:24-28

Just look at what Christians are saying. They routinely claim that God is your father and best friend. Yet if that were true, we would observe all the same behaviors from God that we observe from our fathers and friends. But we don't observe this. Therefore, there is no God who is our father or our friend. The logic of this is truly unassailable, and no "free will" excuse can escape it. For my father and friends aren't violating my free will when they speak to me, help me, give me advice, and answer my questions. Therefore, God would not violate my free will if he did so. He must be able to do at least as much as they do, even if for some reason he couldn't do more. But God doesn't do anything at all. He doesn't talk to, teach, help, or comfort us, unlike my real father and my real friends. God doesn't tell us when we hold a mistaken belief that shall hurt us. But my father does, and my friends do. Therefore, no God exists who is even remotely like my father or my friends, or anyone at all who loves me. Therefore, Christianity is false.
No, God does deal with us as the perfect father. Don't forget that the Bible reveals that without Christ you have no will that is even remotely free. We are enslaved to sin and incapable of being sinless. Charist came and lived the perfect life in our place. When we go to heaven its not because of us, its about who Jesus is and what He did. We ride his coat-tails.

The conclusion is inescapable. If Christianity were true, then the Gospel would have been preached to each and every one of us directly, and correctly, by God--just as it supposedly was to the disciples who walked and talked and dined with God Himself, or to the Apostle Paul, who claimed to have had actual conversations with God, and to have heard the Gospel directly from God Himself. Was their free will violated? Of course not. Nor would ours be. Thus, if Christianity were really true, there would be no dispute as to what the Gospel is. There would only be our free and informed choice to accept or reject it. At the same time, all our sincere questions would be answered by God, kindly and clearly, and when we compared notes, we would find that the Voice of God gave consistent answers and messages to everyone all over the world, all the time. So if Christianity were true, there would be no point in "choosing" whether God exists anymore than there is a choice whether gravity exists or whether all those other people exist whom we love or hate or help or hurt. We would not face any choice to believe on insufficient and ambiguous evidence, but would know the facts, and face only the choice whether to love and accept the God that does exist. That this is not the reality, yet it would be the reality if Christianity were true, is proof positive that Christianity is false.

God did not choose to talk to us today the way he did to the disciples. But it's still the complete message. Jesus said in John 20:29-31

29Then Jesus told him, "Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."

30Jesus did many other miraculous signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. 31But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.

So although we did not walk, talk, and see Jesus personally, we are blessed today because have more of the full picture than they did. We have the entirety of the Bible. If you wanna know what God wants you to know all you gotta do is read it.