How on earth can I, or any other thinking adult, accept a dismissal of Epicurus' lethal refutation of the existence of god on the grounds that, well, god really wants to eliminate evil, and he can do it, but he will do it in his own time?
Why can't people come up with something that hasn't been answered or refuted? Read Mariano's answer at the following link:
Another atheist against my article on atheism | True Freethinker
Stein was a jerk. Dawkins said from the start he wasn't comfortable putting a definite number on the probability of God's existance and would rather leave it at "very unlikely". Stein sugested 99%, Dawkins was like "ok that'll do. 99, why not?" And then Stein went on and on about "why not this number? Why not that number?" 99 was STEIN'S sugestion in the first place.
ReplyDeleteDoes Stein just, never remember the last thing he said?