The error that he points out that made me roll-on-floor-laughing was that although the book was about analyzing Greek manuscripts, the cover has Hebrew in its background printed upside down! I know some people might point out that we can't say that it's a mistake it may have been purposeful You may have a point. But many of them would also argue against God's existence because of the way nature work does not make sense to them. Their objection is answered the same way: you don't know what the intended purpose was.
Mariano is a very gifted writer and this post especially contains very quotable sections. Here is the main point of the post in Mariano's words:
Now, if you are paying attention—or are you like me and simply cannot afford to pay attention? :o)—you may be thinking 1) that is only 16 errors, 2) they are mostly merely misspellings, 3) they do not affect the contents of the text and certainly do not affect any major point which the book seeks to make.
As for 2) and 3); thank you for noticing as this is precisely, word for word, how many of us feel about Bart Ehrman’s criticisms of the New Testament manuscripts.
Mariano also quoted Ehrman's interviews - things i have heard or read Ehrman say myself - about Ehrman's own path to agnosticism and how he really had no good reason to leave (if he ever truly was born-again) Christianity. I think Mariano is spot on.
People like Ehrman must be answered because so many people are taking his conclusion as proof that there is no God and that Christianity is a false religion. People are looking for reasons to ignore God and Ehrman is giving it to them. In talking to atheist myself I have had Ehrman's work waved at me as if he mattered. People like Mike Licona, William Lane Craig, James White, and Mariano are literally doing the work of God in showing that Ehrman is not correct in his conclusions and why.
I can't wait to read Mariano's part 2.
Atheism is Dead: Bart Ehrman’s Millions and Millions of Variants, part 1 of 2