Thursday, September 16, 2010

Debunking Christianity: A Mind of Its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives


John Loftus wrote the following post:
In her book A Mind of Its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives, Cordelia Fine cautions us when it comes to the conclusions of our brains. I claim that believers ought to take special heed of this and become agnostics. Believers retort that my brain may be deceiving me too. Let me say two things in response:
One) Okay let's all agree with the scientific data and become agnostics. I'm game if you are, otherwise dispute the data. Two) I do not affirm any religious beliefs. I am a non-believer. I don't think the evidence is there to believe in a three headed eternally existing God who created this particular world and became one of us to die on a cross for our sins in one lone part of the ancient world who subsequently bodily resurrected from the grave but was only seen by a few handfuls of people, thereby leaving the rest of us to take their word on what they saw or spend an eternity in hell because we did not see this event for ourselves or believe their written testimony since we were born in a different time and place and were taught to believe differently based on our own upbringing. Again, I do not believe this. It does not represent an intelligent plan from a perfectly good, all powerful God. If our brains deceive us when it comes to important issues like this then it's best not to be gullible and to demand evidence, hard evidence, positive evidence before we'll believe, especially since there are so many other believers in this world who are certain they are right about such matters too. Since there are so many different people all certain they have the answers to existence I can look at them all and say that until one of them steps up to the plate and offers something more by way of evidence than the others do then I cannot believe in any of them, and that's what I do.
I want to say I agree with Loftus. There is no "evidence is there to believe in a three headed eternally existing God who created this particular world and became one of us to die on a cross for our sins in one lone part of the ancient world who subsequently bodily resurrected from the grave but was only seen by a few handfuls of people, thereby leaving the rest of us to take their word on what they saw or spend an eternity in hell because we did not see this event for ourselves or believe their written testimony since we were born in a different time and place and were taught to believe differently based on our own upbringing." Christians don't believe in a three-headed, eternally existing God. And we don't expect you to take their word on what they saw. You have no excuse you can know the resurrected Lord for yourself. This cuts through time and space and culture. No Christian is asking Loftus or anyone to believe the quote. Of course you should demand evidence and follow it. What the quote shows is a distinct misunderstand of what the nature of God is and what Christians believe. If you want to disagree with what the Bible says is fine...just stop misrepresenting what the Bible says. The Pictures on this blog post are accurate as to what God looks like.


Debunking Christianity: A Mind of Its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: Nabeel Qureshi and Mufti Sulaiman Hashim: Who Is Jesus?

Nabeel debates Mufti Sulaiman on who Jesus is.








Answering Muslims: Nabeel Qureshi and Mufti Sulaiman Hashim: Who Is Jesus?

Quick Report from Santa Fe

Dr. White posted some cross examinations of his debates with Robert Sungenis from September 10th 2010.






Quick Report from Santa Fe

Debate: "The Bodily Assumption of Mary" Robert Sungenis vs. James White | True Freethinker

Wow, Mariano has been busy. He introduced the debates held in Santa Fe, New Mexico in which James White debated Robert Sungenis. This post I'm linking to gives links to both debates and Mariano's lecture on Rabbinic Judaism and The Baha'i Faith. Great stuff!!!!


Debate: "The Bodily Assumption of Mary" Robert Sungenis vs. James White | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

He Lives: I'm so glad I missed the Battle of Armageddon

David Heddle had a very interesting post on his blog where he explains the dispensational view that the Armageddon described in Revelations already happened and that the book was really written before 70 AD. The view is that the devastation Israel experienced is referring to the Romans destroying Israel as a nation in 70 AD. I'm not sure I agree. I know that isn't the way I've been taught to look at Revelations, but on the other extreme the "Left Behind" version has many, many problems. I don't quibble much on eschatology because in the final sense it's moot. Either you are saved and going to heaven or you are going to hell and nothing but Jesus can change the fact no matter who is right.

He Lives: I'm so glad I missed the Battle of Armageddon
Enhanced by Zemanta