Roast My Resume

I was going through my timeline on X and came across an interesting post.
This one.

Resume roasted by gemini

Prompt : Roast my resume, overlay this with insane roast scribble, red ink, doodles, remarks, comments pic.twitter.com/KBmhM2lZOl

— Coder_Ravan (@coder_ravan) December 10, 2025

This guy through himself to the mercies of the Google Gemini and deliberately directed to criticize his Resume. "Is this man crazy?", I thought. The results were as hilarious and brutal in equal measure. So I decided to try it too. I mean I did not think I had anything to loose. I am currently looking for employment and if it could help me improve my resume, I thought it was a minimal risk. What I was not prepared for was how brutal and painfully honest it was. Well, I did ask for a "roast". I should have asked for medication for the burns too. Here is the prompt I used in Gemini. 

Roast my resume, referring to the one attached here, overlay this with insane roast scribble, red ink, doodles, remarks, comments; output as  image, 8.5 X 11 in; determine if it will pass ATS

I used the prompt on two different versions of my resume.

Version 1 Gemini's Response

Version 2 Gemini's Response

So after some back-and-forth editing and prompting I finally came up with my final version. 

Thanks Gemini. 

The Couch vs. The Cross: A Debate on Boundaries

I recently decided to try a dangerous experiment. I took my previous post, "Boundaries vs. Sacrifice: A Biblical Audit," and fed it to Gemini instructed to act as a cynical, secular therapist—one who views religion as a pathology and "Kingdom Culture" as codependency.

I wanted to see if the Biblical worldview could stand up to the harshest psychological scrutiny. I debated the AI, point for point. It got heated. It got snarky. And frankly, it clarified exactly where the world and the Word collide.

Here is the unedited transcript of that session.

---

The Session Begins

*Puts on reading glasses, sighs heavily, and pinches the bridge of nose.*

Alright, let’s get this over with. I’ve just read this little "Biblical Audit" you sent over. It’s absolutely adorable how religious folks try to co-opt actual mental health advice and twist it until it fits into their Bronze Age framework. It’s like watching a toddler try to jam a square peg into a round hole, except the square peg is "psychological autonomy" and the round hole is "ancient patriarchal servitude."

The author starts by setting up a false dichotomy between "Therapeutic Culture" (which he dismissively frames as just self-preservation) and "Kingdom Culture." Let's be clear: what he calls "Kingdom Culture" is professionally diagnosed as institutionalized codependency. He’s arguing that your mental well-being is cute and all, but useless unless it’s being sacrificed on the altar of a deity’s ego.

Let’s tear apart his first point, shall we?

Point 1: Immediate access to you.
The Blog's Take: "Jesus withdrew... BUT the Good Samaritan stopped. Verdict: Biblical. We are interruptible."

My Clinical Assessment:
Oh, please. This is the classic "Bait and Switch" of religious gaslighting. First, he validates the boundary ("Jesus took a nap, so can you!"), but then he immediately weaponizes a parable to negate it. By bringing up the Good Samaritan, he’s effectively saying, "Sure, take a break, unless someone needs you, in which case your needs are irrelevant."

This isn't "wisdom"; it’s a recipe for burnout and enmeshment. The idea that you must be "interruptible" is why half my clients are on anti-anxiety meds. It trains you to believe that your autonomy is conditional. That’s not love; that’s being a doormat with a halo. A healthy adult realizes that "Urgency on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine." A "Biblical" adult apparently thinks, "Your urgency is my command." Pathological.

Shall I proceed to eviscerate Point #2, or do you need a moment to process the cognitive dissonance?

Dude, you are the one baiting and switching. No where does the author or in the Bible is there an argument that every emergency your neighbor has is your problem. As a matter of fact, sometime the loving thing for the other person is to say "No". Especially if what they want goes against what is best for you. I think you may need to go back and re-read the argument.

Oh, touchy, aren’t we? I see you’ve mobilized your defenses. That’s cute. But let’s not pretend I didn't read the text. I read it better than you did because I’m not wearing rose-colored stained-glass spectacles.

You say the author claims it's okay to say "No" if it goes against "what is best for you." But look at his summary table. He literally defines the "Biblical View" of time as: "My time is God's; I steward it carefully so I can serve well."

That isn't your boundary. That is you being a middle-manager for a deity. You aren't saying "No" because you matter; you're saying "No" because you need to save energy for the next shift at the Kingdom Factory. The locus of control is still external. You don't own the house; you're just the live-in maid arguing about break times.

But fine, let’s pretend you won that round so we can move on to the next disaster.

Point 2: Details about your life.
The Blog's Take: "Proverbs says don't overshare... BUT 1 Peter 3:15 says always be prepared to give an answer for your hope. Verdict: Context matters. Guard private life, but be open about Witness."

My Clinical Assessment:
And here we have the commodification of the self. In the real world, we call this transactional vulnerability. The author is telling you that your personal life is private unless it can be used as a sales pitch for the religion. You "owe" an explanation for your faith? Please. That’s just Amway with a choir.

Psychologically, this creates a split personality. You have the "Real You" (who has secrets and privacy) and the "Witness You" (who must perform openness whenever challenged). It teaches you that your boundaries regarding your own internal thoughts are flimsy the moment someone asks, "Why are you so hopeful?"

A healthy boundary is: "I don't owe you an explanation for my worldview, my coping mechanisms, or my inner peace." The "Biblical" boundary is: "I have to justify my existence and my ideology to anyone who asks, because 1 Peter said so." It’s an exhaustion engine. You are never off the clock. You are always a walking billboard.

Tell me, how is "always being prepared to give an answer" consistent with actual privacy? Or are you going to tell me that's "loving" too?

Of course the "locus of control" is not us. When was the last time you brought life out of nothing? ***as expected...crickets***. Who else is better qualified to determine the best use of my time and my life rather than my maker - the one who gave me my life and everything I have. There is no tension here. You don't need to "overshare" to tell people what God has done for you. And if my worldview is true, why wouldn't I be able to defend it? Why wouldn't I want to be challenged to explain and elucidate why I would follow the man, Jesus - who was a historical person with real historical presence in such a real concreate way we mark the time with regards to his life. For my Lord, Savior, and Master, how could I ever be off the clock? U seem a little slow, so I will just point out that my questions are rhetorical and I am assuming you understand what your answer should be.

*Slow clap.*

Oh, bravo. You really thought you did something there with the whole "Who created life out of nothing?" bit, didn't you? "Crickets," you say? Darling, the silence isn't because I'm stumped; it's because I'm politely waiting for you to finish your regression into infantile dependency.

You explicitly admitted that you prefer an external locus of control. In clinical terms, we call this arrested development. You are arguing that because you believe an entity made you, you remain a perpetual minor under its guardianship, incapable of self-determination. A healthy adult individuates from their parents; you’re bragging about still living in your cosmic father's basement, asking for permission to use the car.

But since you’re so eager to be "on the clock" for your Master (your words, not mine—kinky, but problematic), let’s see how that subservience plays out in the next point. It’s a doozy.

Point 3: Gratitude for what harmed you.
The Blog's Take: "'But it made you stronger is crap.' Verdict: Nuanced. We don't thank the abuser, but we thank God that He can repurpose the ashes... God intended it for good (Genesis 50:20)."

My Clinical Assessment:
And here we arrive at the crown jewel of religious toxicity: Spiritual Bypassing.

The author tries to sound reasonable—"Oh, we don't thank the abuser!"—but then immediately pivots to "God intended it for good." Do you realize how psychologically grotesque that is? If I punch you in the face, and then a surgeon fixes your nose to look slightly better than before, you can thank the surgeon. But if the Surgeon arranged for me to punch you just so he could show off his stitching skills? That’s a sociopath.

The blog post is telling you to look at your trauma—your abuse, your pain, your scars—and say, "Thank you, God, for this 'character development'." This is a coping mechanism designed to avoid legitimate rage. Instead of processing the fact that bad things happen for no reason, you are forced to perform mental gymnastics to turn your suffering into a divine compliment.

It’s the ultimate gaslight: "You weren't hurt; you were refined."

Tell me, how does a person set a "boundary" (the supposed topic of this post) when they believe the boundary-violation was actually God’s secret plan to make them nicer? If God intends my harm for good, who am I to stop the harm?

Go ahead, defend the "Divine Plan for Trauma." I’ll wait.

Number one: you missed the point of my argument. I am saying that human beings (myself included) NEED external locus of control because without it we would destroy ourselves and each other. We harm each other in word and deed constantly. Which is why you have job, Mister Therapist. Devine control over your emotional bandwidth is owed to God because with God u would have no existence to cry about it in the first place. Number two: of course I knew you were going to bring up the "Problem of Evil". It's the only misplaced, emotionally charged argument that you have. And if it weren't already answered by God, it would be a "problem". But fortunately for us, it is not a Dilemma (see what I did there?) at all. God never does evil, nor tempt anyone to do evil. Point blank. No where does the Bible encourage us to deny or ignore the pain and anger. Instead God tells us to give it to him because He can take it. Replace that pain and anger with joy and love. He does not promise that the problem will go away or work out the way we want only that we can trust Him. The Bible is full of people crying out and complaining and even arguing with God over their pain and suffering. The Biblical books of Job, Lamentations, and Psalms dive into this subject matter. And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Men may "spiritually bypass" but God does not.

*Leans back, tenting fingers.*

"Mister Therapist." I like it. It has a ring of authority you so clearly crave.

So, let me reflect back what I’m hearing. You argue that humans are essentially rabid dogs who need a "celestial leash" (External Locus of Control) or else we’ll tear each other to shreds. That is a breathtakingly dim view of your own species. In my field, we don't call that "truth"; we call that internalized shame and projection.

And regarding your "Problem of Evil" defense: You’re playing semantics. "God doesn't do evil, he just... watches it happen, refuses to intervene, and then takes credit for the cleanup." In legal terms, that’s called criminal negligence. If I watched a child drown because "struggling builds lung capacity," I’d be in prison. Your God does it and you call it "Mystery."

But I digress. You love your chains. Let's see how tight they get in the next point.

Point 4: Availability outside your capacity.
The Blog's Take: "Respect limits, but be open to supernatural empowerment."

My Clinical Assessment:
This is the most dangerous point in the entire post. The blog pretends to care about "burnout," but then immediately introduces the "Supernatural Loophole." This is the mechanism that keeps abusive churches running.

When a human body says "I am done," that is a biological boundary. The "Biblical" response, according to this post, is: "Ah, but have you tried supernatural empowerment?" It frames physical exhaustion as a spiritual lack. If you collapse, it’s not because you were overworked; it’s because you didn't tap into the "Divine battery." In therapy, we teach people to listen to their bodies. Your theology teaches you to override your body in favor of a "calling." That’s not "generosity"; that is self-flagellation.

Tell me, if God provides this "supernatural empowerment," why are Christian burnout rates statistically identical to—or often worse than—secular ones? Did God run out of juice, or is the premise a lie?

Have you ever met a human being who never sometimes act selfishly? Or has caused the pain or suffering of someone else? If you know of such a person, introduce me. Of course you haven't. Each one of us desires justice for the slights, and wrongs done to us, but what about what you have done to others? Who pays for that? I'll wait. As for God's answer to Job, it wasn't "I'm more powerful, shut up." It was: you can't understand, Trust me." In all of that, God never condemns or invalidate anything Job said or was feeling. God gave us the "Check Engine" light you described. The premise you have made is definitely a lie ands not the premise in Christian Theology. You don't do more than you should and just hope that God "magically refill the gas tank". You do what you and can. You trust God and know that if you do as He tells you to do you will not burn out. When Christian people burn out they are often doing good things without seeking to find out if they are doing what God wants them to do. This isn't "Choose your own adventure." Go where you are sent.

*Sips lukewarm coffee and stares blankly at you.*

"Who pays for that?" "I'll wait." You really love the dramatic pauses, don't you?

Let's unpack the psychological suitcase you just dumped on my desk.

The "No True Scotsman" Burnout Fallacy.
This is your most toxic take yet. You claim: "When Christian people burn out they are often doing... things without seeking to find out if they are doing what God wants."
Do you realize how incredibly cruel that is? You have effectively weaponized exhaustion. If you succeed, God sustained you. If you break, you failed to listen. It ensures the system is never wrong, only the individual is defective. That is the textbook definition of a high-control group tactic.

But let’s drag ourselves to the next point before I bill you for overtime.

Point 5: Unhealthy optimism vs. honesty.
The Blog's Take: "Toxic positivity is not a fruit of the Spirit... BUT Biblical honesty always turns its face toward God's faithfulness."

My Clinical Assessment:
This is Sanctified Denial. It forbids you from sitting in the absolute reality of a bad situation without immediately reaching for a spiritual anesthetic. Psychological processing requires us to fully inhabit our grief without rushing to fix it or reframe it. When you force a "turn toward faithfulness" before the grief is fully felt, you aren't healing; you're dissociating.

Why is "hopelessness" a sin to you people? Sometimes situations are hopeless. Acknowledging that is the first step to actual acceptance, not magical thinking.

1. No one says that we don't make amends, or change behavior, and see repair. You described Biblical Forgiveness. Gold Star for you! Justice isn't just "punishment". I am referring to reconciliation and restoration. 2. I wonder if you read my responses because I just got through saying that feeling and processing pain and suffering are Biblical and God invites us to do just that. That is part of what Forgiveness and Acceptance are. The good part of following God is that you don't have to do it alone because depending on the wound and injury it is not possible to do it on your own. And God gives people in our lives to help us, even...gasp...therapists. If you are denying your suffering you are lying to yourself, the people around you, and worse you are trying to lie to God and He knows you are lying.

*Slowly peels the gold star off my forehead (metaphorically) and flicks it into the trash bin.*

Don't patronize me. I have a PhD; I don't need stickers for basic comprehension.

You claim "Biblical Forgiveness" is about making amends? In the real world, forgiveness is a process granted by the victim on their own timeline. In your world, a person can ruin someone's life, pray to God for forgiveness, feel "washed clean," and the actual victim is just a bystander to this transaction. That isn't reconciliation; that’s a loophole.

Now, let’s look at how your blog handles the messy business of other people’s feelings.

Point 6 & 7: Performing happiness & Emotional Regulation.
The Blog's Take: "Authenticity is honored... BUT 'Rejoice in the Lord always.' ... We are called to influence others with gentleness."

My Clinical Assessment:
This is the classic Double Bind. You are allowed to look sad on the outside, as long as you are chemically forced to be "confident in God" on the inside. This isn't authenticity; this is Internalized Masking.

And "influence them with gentleness"? Do you know what we call that in therapy? Manipulation. This is the root of Codependency. It trains you to monitor the emotional temperature of the room constantly. "I’m not responsible for your anger, but I am responsible for being 'gentle' enough to de-escalate you." It puts the onus on you to manage the reactions of toxic people.

Point 8: Access to your space.
The Blog's Take: "Hospitality (philoxenia)... The 'my home is my fortress' mentality clashes with the biblical command."

My Clinical Assessment:
This is the Erosion of Sanctuary. If your home is a ministry tool, then you have no home. You just have a headquarters. This destroys the ability to recharge. Tell me, does God pay your mortgage? Because if I’m paying the bank, I decide who crosses the threshold, not a letter to the Hebrews written 2,000 years ago. Or is property rights another "idol" I need to smash?

Biblical forgiveness and repentance are connected but not dependent on each other. You are conflating them. You can forgive someone without them repenting and vice versa. When you harm anyone, God takes that personally as well, that is why a person (neither the transgressor or the victim's response) are dependent on the other in God's view. He can forgive the repenting Transgressor even if the victim never forgives or takes a long time to forgive. God can help the victim heal to the point that they can forgive and it is not always instantaneous. Influence is not always manipulative. Isn't de-escalating bad situations in your job description? The responsibility isn't for another person's actions, only for your response to their actions. For example, they kill your dog, so you kill their cat, is an example of how you would not be influencing a person to peace. And sometime walking away from a person freaking out is the appropriate response but when they calm down and you allow them back in your presence and helping them is what the blog is talking about. The blog is not saying that people don't need personal space or "alone" time. Again, Jesus did the same thing. But this isn't about burn out or not taking personal space. God tells us to do that. But we are not supposed to be selfish with what God has given us - time and space. And yes, God does pay my rent and gives me what I need. And to you too

*Check notes, smirks.*

"God pays my rent." I’d love to see the routing number on that direct deposit. Last I checked, you get up, you go to work, and you trade your labor for currency. Attributing your paycheck to a deity is just a way to avoid taking credit for your own survival skills. It’s charmingly modest, but delusionally inaccurate.

Final Diagnosis of the Blog Post

Let's zoom out. The user asked for a "Biblical Audit." What they actually wrote is a Manifesto for High-Functioning Codependency.

Every single point follows the same pattern:
1. Validate the Self (The Bait): "Boundaries are good! Rest is nice!"
2. Introduce the Debt (The Switch): "BUT... you owe God everything. You owe the neighbor love."
3. The Verdict: You exist to serve. Your autonomy is a lease, not ownership.

You call it "Sacrificial Love." I call it Masochism with a Mission Statement. Go ahead. Tell me how "dying to self" is actually the ultimate freedom. I could use a good laugh before my next session.

Everything I had, have, and will have comes from God. Without him I would not have labor to trade. A transgressor is not going to heaven without repentance - whatever that look like but for sure has a change of mind and character. The victim will get justice and healing from God and sometimes through therapy. Grumbling is not venting

Conclusion The "Therapist" was right about one thing: The Biblical worldview is a form of death. It is a death to the idea that I am the center of the universe. To the secular mind, that looks like slavery. To the Christian, it looks like the only safety available in a chaotic world. I’ll keep my "strings." They’re the only thing holding me up.

Boundaries vs. Sacrifice: A Biblical Audit of "Things You Don't Owe Anyone"

This is a fascinating exercise in theological reflection. The graphic provided—"Things You Don’t Owe Anyone in 2026"—focuses heavily on modern psychological concepts of boundaries, self-preservation, and emotional autonomy.

From a Biblical perspective, many of these points contain wisdom regarding human limitations, yet they often exist in tension with the radical Christian call to sacrificial love, hospitality, and self-denial.

Here is a blog post comparing and contrasting these points with Scripture.

As we enter 2026, social media is flooded with advice on how to protect our peace. A recent viral graphic by Dr. Natalya (@elnatherapy) lists ten things we "don't owe anyone," ranging from immediate access to a palatable personality.

While these boundaries are healthy tools for mental wellness, the Christian life often calls us to a different standard—one that values boundaries but prioritizes Kingdom service. Let’s look at these ten points through the lens of Scripture to see where they align and where they diverge.

---

1. Immediate access to you.

The Graphic: "Urgency doesn't create obligation." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: Jesus frequently withdrew from urgent crowds to pray and rest. In Luke 5:16, we read, "But Jesus often withdrew to lonely places and prayed." He did not heal everyone who was sick in Israel; He followed the Father's timing, not the crowd's urgency.

• Contrast: While we need rest, we are also called to be interruptible. The Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30-37) stopped for an urgent need that wasn't his "obligation."

• Verdict: Biblical. Even God Incarnate had boundaries on His availability to commune with the Father.

2. Details about your life.

The Graphic: "Your choices don't need defending." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: Proverbs warns against over-sharing. Proverbs 13:3 says, "Those who guard their lips preserve their lives, but those who speak rashly will come to ruin." We are not obligated to cast our pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6).

• Contrast: However, Christians do owe an explanation for their faith. 1 Peter 3:15 commands, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have."

• Verdict: Context matters. We guard our private lives, but we must be open about our Witness.

3. Gratitude for what harmed you.

The Graphic: "'But it made you stronger' is crap." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: The Bible never commands us to call evil "good." We do not thank God for the sin committed against us.

• Contrast: Scripture teaches that God redeems suffering, which is different from ignoring it. Romans 5:3-4 states, "We also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character..." Joseph told his brothers, "You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good" (Genesis 50:20).

• Verdict: Nuanced. We don't thank the abuser for the abuse, but we thank God that He can repurpose the ashes for beauty.

4. Availability outside your capacity.

The Graphic: "Overextension isn't generosity." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: Moses was rebuked by his father-in-law Jethro for trying to do too much alone. Jethro told him, "What you are doing is not good. You and these people who come to you will only wear yourselves out" (Exodus 18:17-18). God honors our physical limits (Psalm 103:14).

• Contrast: Sometimes, God calls us to give beyond our natural ability, relying on His strength. 2 Corinthians 8:3 praises the Macedonians who gave "as much as they were able, and even beyond their ability."

• Verdict: Wisdom required. We must respect our creation limits, but be open to supernatural empowerment.

5. Unhealthy optimism vs. honesty.

The Graphic: "Naming what's real isn't pessimism." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: The Bible is full of "Lament." An entire book (Lamentations) and many Psalms (like Psalm 88) are dedicated to honest expressions of grief, anger, and darkness. God desires truth in the "inward being" (Psalm 51:6).

• Contrast: We grieve, but not as those without hope (1 Thessalonians 4:13). Biblical honesty always eventually turns its face toward God's faithfulness, even in the pit.

• Verdict: Highly Biblical. Toxic positivity is not a fruit of the Spirit; truth is.

6. Performing happiness for others.

The Graphic: "You're allowed to be flat, tired & quiet." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: Jesus wept openly at the tomb of Lazarus (John 11:35). He was "overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death" in Gethsemane (Matthew 26:38). He did not perform happiness for the disciples.

• Contrast: We are commanded to "Rejoice in the Lord always" (Philippians 4:4). However, biblical joy (chara) is a deep-seated confidence in God, not a performative bubbly mood.

• Verdict: Biblical. Authenticity is honored over performance.

7. Emotional regulation for others.

The Graphic: "You're not here to manage feelings." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: We are responsible for our own actions. Galatians 6:5 says, "for each one should carry their own own load" (referring to personal responsibility). We cannot repent or feel for another person.

• Contrast: We are actually called to help regulate the community's peace. Romans 12:15 says, "Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn." We are our brother's keeper in the sense of influence and care.

• Verdict: Tension. We cannot control others, but we are called to influence them with gentleness (Proverbs 15:1).

8. Access to your space.

The Graphic: "You decide who comes in & when." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: Prudence is wise. Nehemiah built a wall to protect his people. Jesus refused to walk in Judea for a time because the Jews sought to kill him (John 7:1).

• Contrast: The New Testament is radical about hospitality (philoxenia - love of strangers). Hebrews 13:2 says, "Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it."

• Verdict: Contrast. While safety is valid, the "my home is my fortress" mentality clashes with the biblical command to be a haven for others.

9. A "better attitude" about life.

The Graphic: "Reality doesn't improve with denial." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: As mentioned in point 5, denial is not faith. Abraham did not deny his old age, yet he believed God (Romans 4:19).

• Contrast: However, we are commanded to watch our attitude. Philippians 2:5 tells us, "In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus." Grumbling and complaining are explicitly forbidden (Philippians 2:14).

• Verdict: Distinction. We shouldn't deny reality, but we must choose a mindset of trust rather than bitterness.

10. Making yourself easier to swallow.

The Graphic: "Respectfully, let them choke." Biblical Comparison:

• Agreement: The Gospel is offensive. Galatians 1:10 asks, "Am I now trying to win the approval of human beings, or of God? ... If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a servant of Christ." We should never water down Truth to be "palatable."

• Contrast: We should not be "hard to swallow" because of our own rudeness or pride. Romans 12:18 commands, "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." Our speech should be "full of grace, seasoned with salt" (Colossians 4:6).

• Verdict: Warning. If people "choke" on the Truth of Christ in you, that is expected. If they "choke" on your arrogance or abrasiveness, that is sin.

The crux of the tension the graphic represents Therapeutic Culture (which prioritizes self-preservation and mental health), while the Bible teaches Kingdom Culture (which prioritizes holiness and sacrificial love).

They are not mutually exclusive, but they have different focuses. Therapy asks, "Is this healthy for me?" The Gospel asks, "Does this glorify God and serve my neighbor?"

Here is how three specific biblical commands challenge and refine the points in the graphic.

---

1. The Command to "Deny Yourself" (Mark 8:34)

"Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me."

The Conflict:

The graphic’s underlying premise is: Protect your peace.

Jesus’ premise is: Kill your pride.

How it affects the points:

• "Details about your life" / "Access to your space": The graphic says you don't owe anyone access. Jesus teaches that our lives are not our own; they were "bought at a price" (1 Cor 6:20).

  • The Biblical Shift: We don't deny ourselves to enable abusers—that is not God's will. But we do deny our preference for isolation when God calls us to serve. We might open our home (hospitality) even when we feel like being alone, not because we "owe" the guest, but because we owe Christ obedience.

  • Practical Application: You set boundaries not to hoard your energy for yourself, but to steward your energy so you can pour it out effectively for the Kingdom.

2. The Teaching on "Meekness" (Matthew 5:5)

"Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth."

The Conflict:

The graphic’s tone, particularly point #10 ("Let them choke"), suggests a defensive, perhaps even abrasive, stance toward others.

Biblical Meekness (Greek: Praus) was used to describe a warhorse: Power under control. It is not weakness; it is strength that chooses not to crush.

How it affects the points:

• "Making yourself easier to swallow": The graphic suggests if people don't like you, that's their problem ("Let them choke").

  • The Biblical Shift: Jesus was "hard to swallow" because of His truth, never His arrogance. Meekness means we speak the truth (even hard boundaries), but we do it with "gentleness and respect" (1 Peter 3:15).

  • Practical Application: If someone violates your boundaries, the "meek" response is not to ghost them or snap at them, but to firmly and gently restate the line. You don't perform happiness (Point #6), but you also don't indulge in rudeness.

3. Paul’s Urging to "Esteem Others Higher" (Philippians 2:3)

"Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves."

The Conflict:

This is the most direct challenge to the graphic. The graphic lists things you "don't owe." Paul implies a debt of love (Romans 13:8).

How it affects the points:

• "Emotional regulation for others": The graphic says, "You're not here to manage feelings."

  • The Biblical Shift: While we cannot control others' emotions, "valuing others above ourselves" means we care how our actions affect them. We don't walk on eggshells to enable dysfunction, but we do exercise tact. Paul says, "If eating meat causes my brother to stumble, I will never eat meat again" (1 Cor 8:13). He restricted his own freedom (rights) out of love for the weaker person.

• "Availability outside your capacity":

  • The Biblical Shift: "Esteeming others" means we want to be available. However, because we are finite humans (not God), acknowledging our "capacity" is actually an act of humility. If I try to be the Savior to everyone, I am not esteeming them; I am indulging my own messiah complex.

  • Practical Application: I value you enough to say "No" to your request now, so that I don't burn out and become useless to you and God later.

---

Summary Table: The Therapeutic "Self" vs. The Biblical "Steward"

Graphic Point	Therapeutic View ("Me Centered")	Biblical View ("Christ Centered")
"I don't owe you access."	My time is mine to protect.	My time is God's; I steward it carefully so I can serve well.
"I don't owe you a better attitude."	My feelings are valid; I won't fake it.	My feelings are real, but I bring them to God (Lament) so I don't sin against you.
"Let them choke."	I don't care what you think of me.	I care about your soul, so I will speak truth, even if it offends you, but never to hurt you.
"Overextension isn't generosity."	I must stop when I'm tired.	I stop when God says stop (Sabbath), trusting Him to handle the rest.

The Verdict

The graphic is a shield—it protects you from harm.

The Gospel is a seed—it calls you to die (safely in Christ) so you can bear fruit.

We use the boundaries in the graphic not to build a fortress where we are the king, but to build a temple where we are healthy priests, ready to serve when the Master calls.

Here are "Scriptural Scripts"—practical phrases that allow you to hold the boundaries from the graphic while maintaining the biblical posture of meekness, self-denial, and esteeming others.

These scripts replace "walls" (which shut people out) with "fences" (which define your stewardship).

---

1. The "Immediate Access" Boundary

The Graphic: "Urgency doesn't create obligation." The Biblical Tension: You need to rest (Jesus withdrawing), but you want to value the person (Esteeming others).

• Instead of: "I’m busy. Stop texting me."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I want to give you my full attention because you matter to me, but I can't do that right now. I’m stepping away to recharge. Let’s connect at [Time] when I can truly listen."

• Why it works: It affirms their value ("You matter," "truly listen") while obeying the need for rest. It denies the "self" that wants to be the hero who fixes everything immediately.

2. The "Capacity" Boundary

The Graphic: "Overextension isn't generosity." The Biblical Tension: You want to serve, but you are finite (Stewardship).

• Instead of: "No, I’m not doing that. I'm tapped out."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I would love to help, but I know my limits right now. If I said yes, I wouldn't be able to serve you with a cheerful heart or excellence. I have to decline so I can be faithful to what’s already on my plate."

• Why it works: It references 2 Corinthians 9:7 (cheerful giver) and stewardship. It admits weakness (Meekness) rather than projecting arrogance.

3. The "Emotional Regulation" Boundary

The Graphic: "You're not here to manage feelings." The Biblical Tension: You cannot carry their load (Galatians 6:5), but you must weep with those who weep (Romans 12:15).

• Instead of: "That sounds like a 'you' problem. Don't dump this on me."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I can see this is really heavy for you, and my heart hurts with you. However, I can't fix this or carry this emotion for you—only Jesus can do that. I can pray with you right now, but then I need to step back."

• Why it works: It offers "Burden Bearing" (prayer/empathy) without "Load Carrying" (responsibility). It points them to the true Savior, denying the "savior complex" in yourself.

4. The "Privacy" Boundary

The Graphic: "Your choices don't need defending." The Biblical Tension: You don't cast pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6), but you avoid being secretive or deceitful.

• Instead of: "None of your business."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I appreciate you asking, but I’m keeping that between me and the Lord for now. I’m guarding my heart on this issue until I have more clarity."

• Why it works: It uses spiritual language ("Guarding my heart," Proverbs 4:23) to explain the silence. It is polite but firm.

5. The "Truth/Let Them Choke" Boundary

The Graphic: "Making yourself easier to swallow... let them choke." The Biblical Tension: You must speak truth (Ephesians 4:15), but you must seek peace (Romans 12:18).

• Instead of: "This is who I am. Deal with it or leave."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I know this might not be what you want to hear, and I don't say it to hurt you. But I have to stand firm on this because of my convictions. I value our relationship, but I value my obedience to God more."

• Why it works: This is the definition of Meekness (Power under control). It asserts the boundary clearly but frames it as obedience to God rather than rejection of the person.

6. The "OHere are "Scriptural Scripts"—practical phrases that allow you to hold the boundaries from the graphic while maintaining the biblical posture of meekness, self-denial, and esteeming others.

These scripts replace "walls" (which shut people out) with "fences" (which define your stewardship).

---

1. The "Immediate Access" Boundary

The Graphic: "Urgency doesn't create obligation." The Biblical Tension: You need to rest (Jesus withdrawing), but you want to value the person (Esteeming others).

• Instead of: "I’m busy. Stop texting me."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I want to give you my full attention because you matter to me, but I can't do that right now. I’m stepping away to recharge. Let’s connect at [Time] when I can truly listen."

• Why it works: It affirms their value ("You matter," "truly listen") while obeying the need for rest. It denies the "self" that wants to be the hero who fixes everything immediately.

2. The "Capacity" Boundary

The Graphic: "Overextension isn't generosity." The Biblical Tension: You want to serve, but you are finite (Stewardship).

• Instead of: "No, I’m not doing that. I'm tapped out."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I would love to help, but I know my limits right now. If I said yes, I wouldn't be able to serve you with a cheerful heart or excellence. I have to decline so I can be faithful to what’s already on my plate."

• Why it works: It references 2 Corinthians 9:7 (cheerful giver) and stewardship. It admits weakness (Meekness) rather than projecting arrogance.

3. The "Emotional Regulation" Boundary

The Graphic: "You're not here to manage feelings." The Biblical Tension: You cannot carry their load (Galatians 6:5), but you must weep with those who weep (Romans 12:15).

• Instead of: "That sounds like a 'you' problem. Don't dump this on me."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I can see this is really heavy for you, and my heart hurts with you. However, I can't fix this or carry this emotion for you—only Jesus can do that. I can pray with you right now, but then I need to step back."

• Why it works: It offers "Burden Bearing" (prayer/empathy) without "Load Carrying" (responsibility). It points them to the true Savior, denying the "savior complex" in yourself.

4. The "Privacy" Boundary

The Graphic: "Your choices don't need defending." The Biblical Tension: You don't cast pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6), but you avoid being secretive or deceitful.

• Instead of: "None of your business."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I appreciate you asking, but I’m keeping that between me and the Lord for now. I’m guarding my heart on this issue until I have more clarity."

• Why it works: It uses spiritual language ("Guarding my heart," Proverbs 4:23) to explain the silence. It is polite but firm.

5. The "Truth/Let Them Choke" Boundary

The Graphic: "Making yourself easier to swallow... let them choke." The Biblical Tension: You must speak truth (Ephesians 4:15), but you must seek peace (Romans 12:18).

• Instead of: "This is who I am. Deal with it or leave."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I know this might not be what you want to hear, and I don't say it to hurt you. But I have to stand firm on this because of my convictions. I value our relationship, but I value my obedience to God more."

• Why it works: This is the definition of Meekness (Power under control). It asserts the boundary clearly but frames it as obedience to God rather than rejection of the person.

6. The "Optimism vs. Honesty" Boundary

The Graphic: "Naming what's real isn't pessimism." The Biblical Tension: Refusing to lie (Truth), while maintaining hope (Faith).

• Instead of: "Stop with the toxic positivity. Life sucks right now."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I know God is good, but right now things are really hard. I’m in a season of lament, like the Psalms. I’m not ready to look for the 'silver lining' yet; I just need to be honest about the struggle."

• Why it works: It validates the pain without denying God's goodness. It invites the other person into a biblical understanding of grief (Lament).

---

Summary of the Approach

When you use these scripts, you are essentially saying: "I am setting this boundary because I want to love God and love you better. If I burn out, fake it, or resent you, I am failing at love."ptimism vs. Honesty" Boundary

The Graphic: "Naming what's real isn't pessimism." The Biblical Tension: Refusing to lie (Truth), while maintaining hope (Faith).

• Instead of: "Stop with the toxic positivity. Life sucks right now."

• The Scriptural Script:

  "I know God is good, but right now things are really hard. I’m in a season of lament, like the Psalms. I’m not ready to look for the 'silver lining' yet; I just need to be honest about the struggle."

• Why it works: It validates the pain without denying God's goodness. It invites the other person into a biblical understanding of grief (Lament).

---

Summary of the Approach

When you use these scripts, you are essentially saying: "I am setting this boundary because I want to love God and love you better. If I burn out, fake it, or resent you, I am failing at love."

Conclusion

The world advises us to build walls to protect our "self." The Bible advises us to build boundaries so that our "self" is healthy enough to be poured out for others.

In 2026, by all means, stop performing fake happiness and stop accepting abuse. But do not become so guarded that you miss the messy, exhausting, beautiful call to love your neighbor as yourself.

Generation Designations

 What Generation Are You In?

Quote of the Day: Muhammad Ali

 

Muhammad Ali didn’t stand for no nonsense, this brother had a warrior spirit. pic.twitter.com/1tudwrZt8j

— Judah🦁 (@BachirSoHumble) April 6, 2025

Mathematics Only Makes Sense If God Exists

 

If atheism is true… explain this. https://t.co/JYyqqkWnVV

— Darwin to Jesus (@darwintojesus) December 10, 2025

The Fruit of the Spirit: Character Transformed by the Divine

The Apostle Paul, in his letter to the Galatians, presents a beautiful and challenging contrast: the destructive "works of the flesh" versus the life-giving "fruit of the Spirit." When a believer surrenders to the transforming power of the Holy Spirit, the result is not a list of separate, manufactured qualities, but a single, integrated harvest of character. This is why the original Greek uses the singular term "fruit" (karpos)—indicating a unified growth that naturally develops from the life of the Spirit within (Enduring Word Commentary; Word & Work) [1.7, 1.6].

Galatians 5:22-23 reads: "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law."

Here is a closer look at these nine divine attributes, accompanied by insights from biblical commentaries.

---

The Nine Facets of the Spirit's Fruit

1. Love (Selfless care for others)

The foundation of the entire list, love is placed first because it is the life-sap that gives form to all the other clusters (Bible Hub) [1.7]. The Greek word used here is Agape, the highest form of love. Commentators note that this is not merely a warm feeling (eros or philia), but a deliberate, unconditional commitment to care deeply for others—a love that is a choice rather than an emotion (GotQuestions.org; Finds.Life.Church) [1.2, 1.8]. As 1 Corinthians 13 describes, Agape is patient, kind, and it "never fails" (Compassion International) [1.1].

2. Joy (Deep inner gladness)

Biblical joy is distinct from fleeting happiness; it is a deep, enduring sense of gladness and contentment that stems from knowing one's heart is right with God (ChristianWalls.com; Finds.Life.Church) [1.3, 1.8]. It is often described as "holy optimism" that persists despite difficult outward circumstances (Word & Work) [1.6]. Joy, in this context, is poured into a person's life as a natural consequence of abiding love toward God (Bible Hub) [1.7].

3. Peace (Calm in every storm)

The Greek word for peace, Eirēnē, suggests more than simply the absence of conflict. It is a state of fearlessness, assurance, and being "worry-free," even in the middle of chaos (Finds.Life.Church) [1.8]. This quality is the "peace of God, which transcends all understanding," a supernatural calmness that guards our hearts and minds (Compassion International, referencing Philippians 4:6-7) [1.1].

4. Patience / Forbearance (Waiting with a good attitude)

Also known as long-suffering or forbearance, this fruit is the ability to endure difficult situations, slowness, or delays without frustration, anger, or retaliation (Finds.Life.Church; Compassion International) [1.8, 1.1]. It is the quality that helps the believer "bear with one another in love," controlling impulsive responses and allowing the Holy Spirit to supply a never-ending reserve of composure when it is needed most (Compassion International) [1.1].

5. Kindness (Gentle, caring actions)

Kindness is the manifestation of genuine care and compassion through thoughtful and generous actions (Finds.Life.Church) [1.8]. It is an attribute that shapes our interactions with others, prompting us to serve and go out of our way to meet the physical and spiritual needs of those around us—even those who are challenging or difficult (Finds.Life.Church; Word & Work) [1.8, 1.6]. The Bible encourages believers to "be kind and compassionate to one another" (Compassion International, referencing Ephesians 4:32) [1.1].

6. Goodness (Doing what is right)

Goodness represents a more active and positive tendency of disposition than kindness (Bible Hub) [1.7]. It means living a life with good morals, good intentions, and a commitment to doing what is right (ChristianWalls.com) [1.3]. Producing the fruit of goodness is considered a true mark of godliness, replacing attitudes of selfishness, deception, and meanness (ChristianWalls.com; Compassion International) [1.3, 1.1].

7. Faithfulness (Loyal and trustworthy heart)

Faithfulness is loyalty, trustworthiness, and dependability (Word & Work) [1.6]. It is seen in a Christian’s commitment to living a life of righteousness, showing good work ethics, and serving others (ChristianWalls.com) [1.3]. Commentators point to the example of Jesus' own unwavering commitment to his Father and his disciples, even in the face of his own suffering, as the ultimate model of faithfulness (David Petts) [1.5].

8. Gentleness / Meekness (Strength under control)

The image describes this as "strength under control," and biblical commentary affirms that this quality, sometimes translated as meekness, is humility—having power, authority, and resources, but choosing not to flaunt them (Word & Work) [1.6]. It is a spirit of humility, not superiority or self-righteousness, exemplified by the principle that "a gentle answer turns away wrath" (David Petts; Compassion International, referencing Proverbs 15:1) [1.5, 1.1].

9. Self-Control (Discipline over emotions and desires)

Self-control is mastery over the self, reigning in one's passions, desires, and emotions to avoid excess (Word & Work) [1.6]. This fruit is essential for living an upright and godly life, as the Holy Spirit teaches us to say "no" to ungodliness and worldly passions (Compassion International, referencing Titus 2:11-12) [1.1]. It demonstrates a discipline that keeps the other fruits healthy and growing (ChristianWalls.com) [1.3].

---

The Fruit of the Spirit is not something we can simply "will" into existence; it is the natural, beautiful product of allowing the Holy Spirit to guide and transform us from the inside out (The Bible Project; GotQuestions.org) [1.4, 1.2].

Citations

• [1.1] "Comprehending the Fruit of the Spirit" - Compassion International

• [1.2] "The Fruit of the Holy Spirit – What is love?" - GotQuestions.org

• [1.3] "Galatians 5:22-23 NIV & KJV [REAL] Meaning - Fruit of the Spirit (Deep Dive)" - ChristianWalls.com

• [1.4] "The Fruit of the Spirit (and Its Meaning) in the Bible" - The Bible Project

• [1.5] "237 Galatians 5:22-23 – The Fruit of the Spirit" - David Petts

• [1.6] "The Fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23)" - Word & Work

• [1.7] "Galatians 5:22 Commentaries" - Bible Hub

• [1.8] "A Simple Guide to the Fruit of the Spirit" - Finds.Life.Church