Showing posts with label Astronomy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Astronomy. Show all posts

Saturday, February 21, 2026

The Man Who Photographed the Stars: The Legacy of Dr. George Robert Carruthers


Long before we had the high-definition, deep-space images of the James Webb Space Telescope, a young scientist named Dr. George Robert Carruthers was revolutionizing how we see the universe. An astrophysicist, engineer, and inventor, Carruthers didn't just study the stars—he built the eyes that saw them from the surface of the Moon.


Early Life and Education

Born on October 1, 1939, in Cincinnati, Ohio, George Carruthers was a "space-age" child before the Space Age even began. By age 10, he had built his first telescope out of cardboard tubes and mail-order lenses. Despite the challenges of growing up in a segregated era, his curiosity remained boundless.

He pursued his passion at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he became a triple-threat in engineering:

  • B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering (1961)

  • M.S. in Nuclear Engineering (1962)

  • Ph.D. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering (1964)

The Invention That Changed Astronomy

In 1964, Carruthers joined the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL). His most significant breakthrough came in 1969 when he patented the "Image Converter for Detecting Electromagnetic Radiation Especially in Short Wave Lengths."

This wasn't just any camera. Most telescopes at the time were "blinded" by Earth’s atmosphere, which absorbs ultraviolet (UV) light. Carruthers’ far-ultraviolet camera allowed scientists to see UV radiation from space for the first time. In 1970, this technology provided the first-ever physical proof of molecular hydrogen in interstellar space, solving a massive mystery about how stars are formed.


Apollo 16 and the Lunar Observatory

The pinnacle of Carruthers' career arrived during the Apollo 16 mission in 1972. He designed a 50-pound, gold-plated Far Ultraviolet Camera/Spectrograph that was placed on the lunar surface by Commander John Young.

It became the first (and only) astronomical observatory on the Moon. While the camera remains on the lunar surface to this day, the film it captured was brought back to Earth, revealing:

  • The first UV images of Earth’s upper atmosphere (the geocorona).

  • Spectacular views of the polar auroras.

  • More than 550 stars and nebulae previously invisible to the naked eye.


A Legacy of Mentorship and Excellence

Carruthers’ brilliance wasn’t confined to the lab. He spent decades advocating for minority representation in STEM. He helped launch the Science and Engineers Apprentice Program (SEAP) and taught at Howard University, ensuring that the next generation of Black scientists had a seat at the table.

"The most immediately obvious and spectacular results were really for the Earth observations, because this was the first time that the Earth had been photographed from a distance in ultraviolet light." — Dr. George Carruthers

Major Awards & Honors

YearHonor
1972NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal
1987Black Engineer of the Year
2003Inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame
2012National Medal of Technology and Innovation (Presented by Barack Obama)

Dr. George Carruthers passed away on December 26, 2020, but his work remains—quite literally—on the Moon, looking out at the universe he helped us understand.


Sources

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Thursday, November 13, 2025

Detaild Animation of the Motion of Stars


 

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Scientists Confirm Discovery of Ninth Planet in Our Solar System

 


Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Running to the Other Planets

 


Tuesday, June 10, 2025

How long is a day on Each Planet?

 


Saturday, September 28, 2019

Responding to "Do we live on a young or an old earth? - Ken Ham vs Jeff Zweerink"

I love to listen/watch Justin Brierley's Unbelievable? podcast. He always having engaging conversations/debates. This one is no different. This one has Young Earth Creationism (YEC) vs Old Earth Creationism (OEC). Ken Ham vs Jeff Zweerink.


This is by far not the first time I've seen Ken Ham debate this. And he seems intractable as ever. It's like he does not listen to any viewpoint other than his own. Don't get me wrong. I do think that Ken Ham loves God and that he is a real Christian although I disagree with him on his conclusions. My biggest problem with him is that he does not see that other Christians can love God, respect the Bible, and yet disagree with him. For Ken Ham, his Young Earth Creationism is a litmus test for orthodoxy. He doubts your sincerity and your salvation if you disagree with him on the age of the earth. This is not a salvation issue.  As Frank Turek once pointed out, Jesus is not going to kick you out of heaven if you get this wrong. But I want my views to be true.

In addition, I see no reason to conclude that believing the Bible means denying science or common sense one way or the other. Although I do not agree with Ham that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, I also know that does not mean that Ham , or those who agree with him, are stupid and/or evil. Simply put: the conclusions you draw depend on the assumptions you make.  Ham's conclusions are based on his Biblical interpretations that I do not agree with.

Ken makes some of the following assumptions. Green means that I can see how one can see that. Red means I think he is reaching.

1. The six days of creation are six twenty-four hour days like we experience now.

The Hebrew word "yom" was translated "day" but at it's core it means "a period of  time". God is all powerful. Any period of time would have suffice. 1 Billion Years. 1 trip around the sun. 1 second.  Or even 1 attosecond, God can do whatever He wants to do - even six twenty-four hour days. The Bible does not clearly tells us how those periods were measured. Given that there is no mention of  "evening" on the 6th day, the terms "evening" and "morning" may be symbolic. I don't know and no one can honestly say they know.

This is where science comes in. It can help us understand what God did and how God did it.

2.The genealogical lists in Genesis list every individual in the line

Given that all the other genealogies in the Bible demonstratively do not include every single people in the line, there is no reason to think that the lists in the Bible are complete. It is a newfangled idea to list everyone in a family tree because back in Biblical times each genealogy has a point that is not to show just who was related. You can see this by just comparing different list. For example look Jesus' line in Matthew vs Luke vs the lists of Kings in the Old Testament. You will see that some are longer than other because each list was making a different point. We cannot use those years to count the age of the Earth.

3. Accepting an Old Earth model means accepting macro evolution

No reason to conclude that.

4. The Old Earth model represents people compromising the word of God to fit in with the world.

No reason to think this is true for everyone.

5. Ken Ham disagrees about when and how the Bible should be taken literally and worries that people would be tempted to compromise on other parts of Scripture if they are good with compromising on this one.

This is why we need to pray and follow the truth, not stick to what makes you completely.

6. We don't need Hebraic and Greek Scholar to be the final authority on what the Bible says because we can read and understand the Bible for ourselves.

I agree because we are responsible to know God for ourselves.

7. Implying that there was never anything that died (animals as well) before Adam's disobedience in the Garden, plunging the world into the inevitability of sin and death.

This one has a theological bent built on the doctrine of Original Sin. While I accept the doctrine of Original sin, I think Ham is also assuming that an Old Earth means that macro Evolution must also be true and all living things evolved from a single lifeform while all others died out because they could not adapt to the changing world. I'm not willing to buy that. Truth is I am only sure that the Bible istrue but it does not give us enough to jump to conclusions when it comes to the timeline. We don't know how long Adam and Eve were in the Garden and we don't really know if the animals were eating one another or not. More revelation and facts are needed.

On the other hand, Old Earth Creationists (OEC) must also make assumptions, as well as scientists who study other fields. Some assumption that are sometimes made in OEC include:

1. The speed of light is constant no matter where you are in the universe, how fast you are moving yourself and has always been the same.

This is a standard scientific assumption. It's the insight that Einstein had that lead him to postulating Special Relativity. And it can be bolstered by experimentation. In college, I observed this in several experiments and the speed of light was near constant. I'm willing to base my life on this one. Why not? Our technologies that harness electromagnetism definitely are based on this idea,

2. The amount of Uranium 238 equaled the amount of Uranium 235 in the earth's crust when the earth first formed. And their decay rates have remained constant.

Because we know the ratio of Uranium 235  to Uranium 238 in the earth's crust today and the rate of decay for both based on the half-life of each element, we can calculate the age of the planet if we assume both elements were in equal amounts in the beginning, I go along with this until either the assumptions are proven wrong or a better theory comes along. Besides, it makes the math work out.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Peregrinations: Evidence from Astronomy

I've been enjoying the blog of Rick Gerhardt. Some video of him answering question about science and evolution and how it relates to Christianity. Check these out!



The Evolution Debate from :redux on Vimeo.



Is there astronomical or astrophysical evidence for evolution? from :redux on Vimeo.



Is evolution a fact? from :redux on Vimeo.



Peregrinations: Evidence from Astronomy
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Earth Guide for Aliens [Video]

In 1977, a gold plated copper disk containing information, images, and sounds from earth was loaded into one of the voyager probes and shot into space. In a recent post, a video containing some of the information was posted.
Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan's Earth Guide For Aliens from NPR on Vimeo.


Earth Guide for Aliens [Video]
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 1, 2010

ID.Plus: Glise 581g - first 'earth-like' exoplanet?

You may have heard about the discovery of a planet light years away that is the closest to being like earth than ever observed before: Gelise 581g. Some folk have been saying that its guaranteed to have life on it. However, I like this blog post because Peter Williams does a good job in explaining why breaking out the champagne because we have found another planet capable of supporting life as we know it is premature. Don't get excited yet.
Thus far we have an unconfirmed report that Gliese 581g might be rocky (since it may be too small to be a gas giant - although the mass given is a minimum figure) and that it seems to be in the right 'goldilocks' temperature zone for liquid water - that's if there is any water there and if the atmosphere is of the right composition!
Of course, the phrase 'Earth-like' is being used with some lattitude here: the gravity on Gliese 581g is higher than on earth (because its about three to four times the size of Earth). Moreover, the planet is 'tidally locked', meaning it doesn't rotate (i.e. no seasons). This probably means that there's only a narrow 'twilight zone' of the planet that's even potentially habitable; assuming, of course, that the atmosphere (if it even has one) hasn't frozen out over time to the night side of the planet!
I think we should pay Gilse 581g a visit.
ID.Plus: Glise 581g - first 'earth-like' exoplanet?
Enhanced by Zemanta