Wednesday, February 4, 2026

The Hydration Hero's Hard-Won Victory: Lonnie Johnson and the Super Soaker Saga


In the annals of toy history, few inventions spark as much joyful nostalgia as the Super Soaker. For millions, the iconic water gun defined summer days, backyard battles, and triumphant drenchings. But behind the bright plastic and powerful streams lies a story of ingenuity, perseverance, and a hard-fought battle for what was rightfully owed.

It all began with a brilliant mind and a serendipitous accident. In 1990, Lonnie Johnson, a nuclear engineer who had worked with NASA on the Galileo mission to Jupiter and on stealth bomber programs for the U.S. Air Force, was experimenting with a new kind of heat pump. During his tests, a high-pressure stream of water shot across his bathroom. The engineer in him saw a problem to solve, but the kid in him saw something else entirely: a revolutionary water gun.

"I was trying to make a heat pump that used water as the working fluid, and I accidentally squirted water across the bathroom," Johnson recalled in an interview. "I thought, 'This would make a great water gun.'" And thus, the "Squirt Slinger" was born, later to be famously renamed the Super Soaker.

**From Shower to Super Stardom ** Johnson's invention was unlike any water gun before it. Traditional water guns relied on simple triggers and limited range. The Super Soaker, however, utilized an air-pressure system that allowed for incredibly powerful and long-distance streams. This innovation transformed water fights forever, making them more dynamic, strategic, and, let's be honest, much wetter.

He licensed his invention to Larami Corporation, which later became part of Hasbro, one of the world's largest toy companies. The Super Soaker hit shelves in 1990 and quickly became a cultural phenomenon. By 1992, it was the best-selling toy in America, generating hundreds of millions of dollars in sales. Lonnie Johnson's invention was a runaway success, solidifying its place in the pantheon of beloved toys.

The Battle for Royalties

Despite the Super Soaker's monumental success, Johnson found himself in a prolonged and frustrating battle over unpaid royalties. For years, he claimed Hasbro had underpaid him for the use of his invention. The dispute was complex, involving intricate licensing agreements and accounting practices.

"It was never about trying to take anything away from them," Johnson stated. "It was about getting what was due."

Finally, after years of legal wrangling, justice prevailed. In 2013, 23 years after his groundbreaking invention, Lonnie Johnson was awarded a staggering $72.9 million in a settlement with Hasbro. This monumental victory was a testament to his unwavering determination and a crucial moment for inventors everywhere. It underscored the importance of protecting intellectual property and ensuring fair compensation for creative genius.

More Than Just a Toy

The Super Soaker's impact extends far beyond the realm of toys. Lonnie Johnson's story is an inspiring example of how curiosity, innovation, and persistence can lead to extraordinary achievements. Today, Johnson continues to invent, holding over 100 patents. He is a passionate advocate for STEM education, encouraging young people, especially minorities, to pursue careers in science and engineering.

"I think it's very important to demonstrate that you don't have to be a geek to be an engineer," Johnson once said, breaking down stereotypes and inspiring future generations.

The Super Soaker remains a beloved toy, a symbol of summer fun and ingenious design. But now, knowing the full story of Lonnie Johnson's journey, it also stands as a powerful reminder that behind every great invention is often a remarkable inventor, whose vision and perseverance can change the world, one powerful stream at a time.

Sources:

  • "Lonnie Johnson: The Engineer Behind the Super Soaker." Smithsonian National Museum of American History

  • "Super Soaker inventor Lonnie Johnson awarded $72.9M in Hasbro Settlement." CNN Money, February 8, 2013. 

  • Interviews and statements by Lonnie Johnson (as referenced in various news articles and documentaries).

Here's an image of an early Super Soaker model:




Trevor Noah vs Donald Trump 2026

Following the 68th Grammy Awards on February 1, 2026, President Donald Trump threatened to sue host Trevor Noah over a joke linking him to Jeffrey Epstein's private island. Trump condemned the ceremony as "virtually unwatchable" and labeled Noah a "total loser" for the remarks. (cite: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2026-02-02/grammys-trevor-noah-trump-sue-epstein-island-joke) While the President claims the joke was "false and defamatory," legal experts suggest he has a very slim chance of winning a case in court due to broad First Amendment protections for satire and comedy. (cite: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/business/media/trump-trevor-noah-lawsuit-first-amendment.html)

Key Findings

The Joke: During his monologue, Trevor Noah referenced recent updates to the Jeffrey Epstein files, joking about Trump’s alleged visits to the private island. (cite: https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/trump/2026/02/03/donald-trump-epstein-island-trevor-noah-grammys/88487977007/)

Trump's Reaction: In an overnight post on Truth Social, Trump threatened immediate legal action, calling the joke a "defamatory" attack on his character. (cite: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-sue-trevor-noah-grammy-joke-epstein-island-rcna257019)

Legal Consensus: Experts state that because the comments were made by a comedian during an entertainment broadcast, they are unlikely to be viewed as "statements of fact" by a court. (cite: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/business/media/trump-trevor-noah-lawsuit-first-amendment.html)

Public Figure Standard: As a public figure and sitting President, Trump would have to prove "actual malice"—that Noah knew the joke was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. (cite: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p02yg4jro)

Historical Precedent: Courts historically grant significant leeway to political satire, especially in the context of awards show monologues. (cite: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2026-02-02/grammys-trevor-noah-trump-sue-epstein-island-joke)

Background and Context

The controversy arose during the 68th Annual Grammy Awards, where Trevor Noah served as the host for his sixth consecutive year. The joke touched upon a sensitive political topic following the release of unsealed documents related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.(cite: https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/trump/2026/02/03/donald-trump-epstein-island-trevor-noah-grammys/88487977007/) Trump has long denied any wrongdoing regarding his past association with Epstein, and his legal team argues that the joke crossed the line from humor into character assassination. (cite: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-sue-trevor-noah-grammy-joke-epstein-island-rcna257019)


Why a Legal Case is Unlikely to Succeed

Legal analysts point to several factors that make a successful defamation suit nearly impossible in this instance:

Satirical Context: The Supreme Court has established that parody and satire are protected forms of speech, particularly when they cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about an individual. (cite: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/business/media/trump-trevor-noah-lawsuit-first-amendment.html)

The "Actual Malice" Hurdle: Under the landmark ruling New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, public officials must meet a much higher burden of proof for defamation than private citizens. (cite: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p02yg4jro)

Opinion Protection: In the United States, "pure opinion" is constitutionally protected. Because Noah is a professional comedian, his "claims" are viewed through the lens of comedic commentary rather than journalistic reporting. (cite: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/business/media/trump-trevor-noah-lawsuit-first-amendment.html)


Pros and Cons of Pursuing the Suit

Pros (for Trump): It keeps the issue in the news cycle, potentially galvanizes his base against "media elites," and serves as a warning to other comedians. (cite: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p02yg4jro)

Cons (for Trump): The case would likely be dismissed early via "anti-SLAPP" (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) laws, which are designed to prevent the use of the legal system to silence free speech. (cite: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/business/media/trump-trevor-noah-lawsuit-first-amendment.html)


Practical Takeaway

Wait for Official Filings: While Trump has threatened to sue, high-profile figures often make such threats on social media without following through with a formal court filing. (cite: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-sue-trevor-noah-grammy-joke-epstein-island-rcna257019)

Understand the Law: In the U.S., the First Amendment provides nearly absolute protection for political satire, making it very difficult for politicians to win libel cases against comedians. (cite: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/business/media/trump-trevor-noah-lawsuit-first-amendment.html)

Context Matters: The setting of an awards show monologue is one of the most legally protected environments for "edgy" humor.  (cite: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2026-02-02/grammys-trevor-noah-trump-sue-epstein-island-joke)

 

**Related Videos** 



Deportation?

As much as Donald Trump would most likely like to kick Trevor Noah out of the country, he cannot. Trevor is a legal citizen of the United States (cite: https://www.thesouthafrican.com/lifestyle/trump-vs-trevor-noah-grammys-host-epstein-deportation-latest/). Although other legal immigrants have been illegally deported, I think Noah's celebrity should shield him as he continue to speak his mind. 

The Unsung Heroine Who Revolutionized Home Security: Marie Van Brittan Brown

 


In a world increasingly focused on personal safety and home security, it's easy to take for granted the sophisticated systems that protect our loved ones and belongings. But have you ever stopped to wonder who we have to thank for these innovations? The answer, surprisingly to many, lies with an extraordinary Black woman named Marie Van Brittan Brown, who, in 1966, forever change the landscape of home security.

A Nurse's Ingenuity Born from Necessity

Marie Van Brittan Brown was a nurse living in Queens, New York, during a time when crime rates were on the rise, and police response times in her neighborhood were often slow. Feeling vulnerable and unsafe in her own home, especially when she was alone at night, Brown decided to take matters into her own hands. She realized there had to be a better way to monitor her surroundings and feel secure.

Driven by this pressing need, Brown, along with her husband Albert Brown, conceived of and patented the very first home security system. This wasn't just a simple alarm; it was a groundbreaking invention that laid the foundation for virtually every modern security system we use today.

The Birth of a Revolution: How Her System Worked



Brown's ingenious system was remarkably advanced for its time. It featured:

  • A set of four peepholes: These were strategically placed on her front door to offer different vantage points.

  • A sliding camera: This camera could move between the peepholes, allowing the homeowner to see who was at the door from different heights.

  • A monitor: The camera's feed was displayed on a television monitor inside the house, providing a visual of the visitor.

  • A two-way microphone system: This allowed for verbal communication with the person outside.

  • A remote-controlled door unlock button: This innovative feature allowed the resident to remotely grant access.

  • An alarm button: In case of an emergency or suspicious activity, pressing this button would alert the police.

This invention, granted U.S. Patent 3,482,037 on December 2, 1969, was a precursor to modern closed-circuit television (CCTV) and integrated home security systems.

The Evolution of Home Security: From Brown's Vision to Smart Homes

Marie Van Brittan Brown's invention was truly foundational. Let's trace how security systems have evolved, building upon her initial brilliance:

  • Early 1970s - 1980s: The Rise of Basic Alarm Systems: Following Brown's patent, basic alarm systems became more prevalent. These typically involved sensors on doors and windows connected to a central control panel and a siren. While effective at deterring intruders, they lacked the visual and interactive components of Brown's original design.

  • 1990s: Integrating CCTV and Monitoring Services: As technology advanced, CCTV cameras became more common in commercial settings and gradually made their way into some residential applications. The emergence of professional monitoring services also added another layer of security, with alarms being routed to a central station that could dispatch authorities.

  • 2000s: Wireless Technology and Remote Access: The new millennium brought significant advancements in wireless technology, making security system installation less intrusive and more flexible. Remote access via phone lines or early internet connections started to appear, allowing homeowners to arm/disarm their systems from afar.

  • 2010s: The Dawn of Smart Home Security: This decade saw an explosion in smart home technology. Security systems began integrating with other smart devices like thermostats, lighting, and voice assistants. Features like high-definition cameras with night vision, motion detection, cloud storage, and smartphone app control became standard.

  • Today: AI, Facial Recognition, and Comprehensive Integration: Modern home security systems are incredibly sophisticated. They often incorporate artificial intelligence for advanced analytics, facial recognition to distinguish residents from strangers, and seamless integration with entire smart home ecosystems. From video doorbells to drone surveillance, the options for home security are vast and continuously evolving.

The Lasting Legacy

Marie Van Brittan Brown's original patent is still cited in many modern security patents, a testament to the enduring impact of her vision. Thanks to her foresight and determination, we can all feel a greater sense of safety and control over our personal spaces. Her story is a powerful reminder of the often-overlooked contributions of Black inventors and the profound impact that ingenuity, born from a simple need, can have on the world.

Next time you check your security camera feed or arm your alarm system, take a moment to remember Marie Van Brittan Brown – the unsung heroine who made our homes safer, one innovative idea at a time.

Sources:

  • United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): Patent Number 3,482,037 (Home Security System Utilizing Television Surveillance)

  • National Inventors Hall of Fame: Marie Van Brittan Brown (While not yet inducted, her story is widely recognized by inventor advocacy groups and historical societies.)

  • Various historical and technological articles on the evolution of home security. (Specific articles can be found by searching for "history of home security systems" and "Marie Van Brittan Brown invention.")