THEOparadox - The Biblical Paradox Blog: Cornelius Van Til - "Why I Believe In God"

Image via Wikipedia

Here is a good blog post containing a video of Dr Cornelius Van Til answering the question of why he believes in God.



THEOparadox - The Biblical Paradox Blog: Cornelius Van Til - "Why I Believe In God"

God's Knowledge/Man's Knowledge

Jeff Downs has posted an audio of a discussion of the controversy between God's Foreknowledge and Man's Knowledge

Some of you are familiar with what has become known (inappropriately) as the Van Til/Clark controversy; dealing with what constitutes God's knowledge and man's knowledge. Recently the crew from the Reformed Forum spent some time with Dr. Scott Oliphint (who sat under Van Til and now teaches Apologetics at WTS) and addressed this controversy. Click here to listen.

If you are not familiar with Dr. Oliphint, he is the author of The Battle Belongs to the Lord and Reasons for Faith: Philosophy in the Service of Theology, both books dealing with apologetics. He is also one of the editors of Christian Apologetics Past and Present: A Primary Source Reader. Dr. Oliphint is certainly one of my favorites when it comes to contemporary apologetic thought.

God's Knowledge/Man's Knowledge

Van Til and the Trinity: A Quick Response to PuritanReformed

Colin Smith has written a response to a response on his comments on Van Til and the Trinity. I liked what he said and I think he clarified what he had said even more.Collin wrote:

I used the term "essence of God" to describe the divinity shared between the three Persons of the Trinity. The point is that this "divine essence" is not impersonal, but it is by virtue of this shared divinity that the Persons share attributes of the divine, and these attributes are personal. If I may spell it out, the being of God has divine attributes that are personal, and these attributes are shared between the three Persons of the Trinity. As far as I understand, there is nothing heretical about that. Perhaps this point may be a little obvious for a Westminster Seminary student (and I mean no disrespect by that), but I daresay this is not a thought that has occupied much attention in the thinking of most evangelicals.

I think Collin is right. And explains why the Bible uses personal single pronouns regarding God in the Old Testament and for God - the father, God - the son, and God - the Holy Spirit in the New Testament.
Van Til and the Trinity: A Quick Response to PuritanReformed

Van Til and the Trinity: God as a Person

Colin Smith has posted another article in his series on how Cornelius Van Til saw and taught the Trinity. I think that the understanding of the Trinity is important for understanding who and what God is. English is a huge obstacle to expressing these ideas because the way it has evolved we don't make much of a distinction between "person" and "being" anymore. It makes discussing the Trinity difficult because we confuse them and conclude that one being equals one person.

Van Til and the Trinity: God as a Person

Related articles

• Presuppositional Apologetics - 2 (xercised.wordpress.com)
• Presuppositional Apologetics - 3 (xercised.wordpress.com)
• Presuppositional Apologetics - 1 (xercised.wordpress.com)
• Holy beating: Trinity trounces Mount in 'AAA' quarters (nypost.com)

Presuppositional Apologetics and the Trinity

Colin Smith has written an article about how Presuppositional Apologetics connects with the Trinity. A must read!

Presuppositional Apologetics and the Trinity

Where Should I Begin in Reading Van Til and Presuppositional Works?

Jamin Hubner has posted an excellent article about where to start reading the works of Cornelius Van Til (Pictured) and what books one should read to get up to speed on Presuppositional Apologetics.


Where Should I Begin in Reading Van Til and Presuppositional Works?