A young girl in Pakistan forced
— 🏛 🌹PeriklestheGREAT 🌹 🏛 "Vox Populi, Vox Dei" (@PeriklesGREAT) October 1, 2025
to sign a marriage contract with
a forty year old man by her
own Parents?
Sharia Law makes girls &
women Property !
Do we want this in America &
the West ?pic.twitter.com/xGYB5syyD8
Some people think that this video is fake. That the woman is pretending to be a Muslim and lying on Islam. Her interpretation is not unique to her. For example this is why Hamas was raping Israelies October 7, 2023. They felt justified. So therefore, I used Grok to find out who this woman is and I pasted the results below:Female Islamist scholar: “Allah allows Muslim men to rape non-Muslim women to humiliate them.
— Dr. Maalouf (@realMaalouf) September 1, 2025
If we fight infidels, we can take their women as sex slaves and rape them.”
This is the culture that is being brought to the UK and Europe! pic.twitter.com/C1FQRapsnf
The woman in the video is Suad Saleh, an Egyptian Islamic scholar and professor at Al-Azhar University, known for her controversial statements on various issues, including the role of women and interpretations of Islamic law. She has been featured in discussions and debates, often sparking controversy due to her views on topics such as slavery and the treatment of non-Muslims in Islamic contexts. Her statements in the video, as translated by MEMRI-TV, reflect her interpretation of Islamic teachings regarding slavery and the status of female prisoners of war, which aligns with some traditional interpretations but is highly contentious in modern contexts, especially concerning human rights and gender equality.Suad Saleh, born in 1945, is a prominent Egyptian Islamic scholar, television personality, and preacher. She holds a significant position at Al-Azhar University, one of the most prestigious institutions in the Sunni Islamic world, where she serves as a professor and head of the Department of Comparative Jurisprudence, and has also been the Dean of the Faculty of the Women's College. Her academic and public roles have made her a notable figure in discussions about Islam, gender, and contemporary issues within the Muslim world. Saleh's background includes a deep involvement in Islamic education and media. She has been known for her appearances on television, where she discusses various aspects of Islamic law and practice, often addressing topics that are both traditional and controversial in modern contexts. Her interpretations of Islamic texts, particularly regarding issues like slavery, women's rights, and interfaith relations, have drawn attention and criticism, especially in Western media and among human rights advocates. Her statements, as seen in the video from MEMRI-TV, reflect a traditionalist view on certain aspects of Islamic jurisprudence, which some interpret as endorsing practices like slavery and the sexual enslavement of female prisoners of war, though she also critiques modern misapplications of these teachings. This has led to debates about the relevance and application of such interpretations in today's global context, particularly in discussions about immigration, cultural integration, and human rights in Western societies. Saleh's influence extends beyond academia into public discourse, where her views are sometimes seen as representative of certain segments of Islamic thought, though they are not universally accepted within the Muslim community or beyond. Her role at Al-Azhar, an institution with a long history and significant influence in the Islamic world, underscores the complexity of navigating traditional teachings with contemporary ethical standards.The woman in the video is Suad Saleh, an Egyptian Islamic scholar and professor at Al-Azhar University, known for her controversial statements on various issues, including the role of women and interpretations of Islamic law. She has been featured in discussions and debates, often sparking controversy due to her views on topics such as slavery and the treatment of non-Muslims in Islamic contexts. Her statements in the video, as translated by MEMRI-TV, reflect her interpretation of Islamic teachings regarding slavery and the status of female prisoners of war, which aligns with some traditional interpretations but is highly contentious in modern contexts, especially concerning human rights and gender equality.Suad Saleh, born in 1945, is a prominent Egyptian Islamic scholar, television personality, and preacher. She holds a significant position at Al-Azhar University, one of the most prestigious institutions in the Sunni Islamic world, where she serves as a professor and head of the Department of Comparative Jurisprudence, and has also been the Dean of the Faculty of the Women's College. Her academic and public roles have made her a notable figure in discussions about Islam, gender, and contemporary issues within the Muslim world. Saleh's background includes a deep involvement in Islamic education and media. She has been known for her appearances on television, where she discusses various aspects of Islamic law and practice, often addressing topics that are both traditional and controversial in modern contexts. Her interpretations of Islamic texts, particularly regarding issues like slavery, women's rights, and interfaith relations, have drawn attention and criticism, especially in Western media and among human rights advocates. Her statements, as seen in the video from MEMRI-TV, reflect a traditionalist view on certain aspects of Islamic jurisprudence, which some interpret as endorsing practices like slavery and the sexual enslavement of female prisoners of war, though she also critiques modern misapplications of these teachings. This has led to debates about the relevance and application of such interpretations in today's global context, particularly in discussions about immigration, cultural integration, and human rights in Western societies. Saleh's influence extends beyond academia into public discourse, where her views are sometimes seen as representative of certain segments of Islamic thought, though they are not universally accepted within the Muslim community or beyond. Her role at Al-Azhar, an institution with a long history and significant influence in the Islamic world, underscores the complexity of navigating traditional teachings with contemporary ethical standards.
@michellehardy327 Did the Bible really silence women leaders? Discover the truth behind 1 Timothy 2:12 and reclaim your power. #BibleTruth #WomenLeadership #Empowerment #Faith #MelanatedWomen #HistoryUnveiled ♬ original sound - Ruby's Daughter, LLC.
I guess we don't have better noun than Father. Why no reference to "God the Mother"? Mother would certainly describe many of it's alleged qualities...His contention is that the Bible never applies feminine terms or imagery to God. Ryan Anderson refused to open his mind and really look at what the texts say. It doesn't take long to find a lot of material demonstrating that God has no gender as humans do and that both male and female imagery is applied by scripture to help us understand who and what God is and is not. Here is a good link to an article on this subject written by a Christian.
Silly, Atheist, God is for everybody. I totally agree with Dr Shkop on this. I think it's important to look at a few (not all) of the references she and the other referenced article are using.One can only be impressed by the majestic beauty and profound emotion which Jewish sources, especially in the Prophets, conjure through the use of feminine imagery. The numerous and various strong feminine images more than balance the masculine ones. While we must remember that the Divine is beyond form and gender, human language by necessity conceives even the most Abstract in visual images. The multiplicity of feminine images alongside the masculine, and the context in which one or the other is used requires close study and (often mystical) understanding. Careful analysis of the Hebraic texts will reveal that religious experiences and the immediacy of God are to be found in the world of women no less than in that of men. It would be a tragedy - and a travesty - to "castrate" the language, for it would then remove God from the experiential milieus of both men and women, rendering us mortals mute, unable to commune with or communicate about our Creator.
Yet we must realize that God does have a name, the famous Tetragrammaton, or four-lettered name of Hashem - which is made up of the letters yud-heh and vav-heh. The ineffable name of Hashem is a contraction of the Hebrew verb, to be, in past, present and future, and is therefore often translated as The Eternal. However, in the Hebraic source this name is written as a feminine noun - and signifies the aspect of rachamim, which, as indicated earlier, is quintessentially feminine. Thus every blessing and prayer we say, every evocation of the Eternal Presence [Kabbalistically called the "Shechina" ] is in fact an evocation of the feminine concept - the unconditional love of the Creator.The Bible presents men and women as ontologically equal and necessary to one another, but neither equivalent nor interchangeable. We need each other to fulfill the purpose of humanity and together we are the image of our Creator. God is neither male nor female and to try to cast those categories on the infinite God shows that one has no idea who God is.
I don't buy DC's explanation because they say they relaunched these books to bring in new readers. Why alienate children who love Starfire? This is the only book she is in now. Where is her kid-friendly book and now the character is almost unrecognizable.
Prompted by the resoundingly negative critical response to Red Hood And The Outlaws #1's dubious, oversexualized depiction of the superheroine Starfire -- in particular, the disgusted reaction of a 7-year-old fan of Cartoon Network's Teen Titans, a popular animated series in which a version of Starfire appeared -- DC Comics released a terse statement via Twitter (here and here) that advised unhappy readers to "pay attention to the ratings." The full statement is as follows:
We've heard what's being said about Starfire today and we appreciate the dialogue on this topic. We encourage people to pay attention to the ratings when picking out any books to read themselves or for their children.
Red Hood And The Outlaws #1 is rated "T -Teen", which DC Comics defines as "Appropriate for readers age 12 and older. May contain mild violence, language and/or suggestive themes." Fair enough, then. By that guideline, the book is obviously inappropriate for a 7-year-old. But the 7-year-old girl's question, and that of Shortpacked's David Willis and our own Laura Hudson remains valid. Should a Starfire comic book be targeted so narrowly? As part of the bold and massive publishing initiative and mainstream outreach that is DC's New 52, does using characters best-known from all-ages cartoons in books like Red Hood And The Outlaws make sense?
