Personal blog that will cover my personal interests. I write about Christian Theology and Apologetics, politics, culture, science, and literature.
Showing posts with label Gospel of Mark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gospel of Mark. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 15, 2022
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Dr. Craig Evans Discusses a First Century Fragment of Mark
Finally! More information on a fragment of the Gospel of Mark from the first century.
Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Dr. Craig Evans Discusses a First Century Fragment of Mark
Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Dr. Craig Evans Discusses a First Century Fragment of Mark
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Earliest Manuscript of the New Testament Discovered?
Dr Daniel Wallace has posted news of his debate with Dr Bart Ehrman that was held February 1st....but that's not the best part:
Now this is exciting news, but like Dr James White said about it on last Thursday's Dividing Line, I do think that we should wait for the more information before we hang arguments and debates on it. However, Dr Wallace seems pretty excited but he is also cautious. Wallace explained why this is important:
My favorite things about this is that if it pans out that the fragment is from the mid first century, it takes away one more excuse people raise to accepting that the Gospel of Mark is historical and written by one who would have had first-hand knowledge.
Wallace even gives a link for purchase of the debate with Ehrman from February 1st:
Purchase U.S. DVDs of the second debate or international DVDs
Home Page - Earliest Manuscript of the New Testament Discovered?
On 1 February 2012, I debated Bart Ehrman at UNC Chapel Hill on whether we have the wording of the original New Testament today. This was our third such debate, and it was before a crowd of more than 1000 people. I mentioned that seven New Testament papyri had recently been discovered—six of them probably from the second century and one of them probably from the first. These fragments will be published in about a year.
These manuscripts now increase our holdings as follows: we have as many as eighteen New Testament manuscripts (all fragmentary, more or less) from the second century and one from the first. Altogether, more than 40% of all New Testament verses are found in these manuscripts. But the most interesting thing is the first-century fragment.
Now this is exciting news, but like Dr James White said about it on last Thursday's Dividing Line, I do think that we should wait for the more information before we hang arguments and debates on it. However, Dr Wallace seems pretty excited but he is also cautious. Wallace explained why this is important:
But, if this Mark fragment is confirmed as from the first century, what a thrill it will be to have a manuscript that is dated within the lifetime of many of the original followers of Jesus! Not only this, but this manuscript would have been written before the New Testament was completed.
My favorite things about this is that if it pans out that the fragment is from the mid first century, it takes away one more excuse people raise to accepting that the Gospel of Mark is historical and written by one who would have had first-hand knowledge.
Wallace even gives a link for purchase of the debate with Ehrman from February 1st:
Purchase U.S. DVDs of the second debate or international DVDs
Home Page - Earliest Manuscript of the New Testament Discovered?
Related articles
- Earliest manuscript of the New Testament discovered? (winteryknight.wordpress.com)
- First-Century Gospel Fragment? (str.typepad.com)
- Update: First-Century Manuscript of the Gospel of Mark (xcntrik.wordpress.com)
- First-Century Manuscript of the Gospel of Mark (xcntrik.wordpress.com)
- The Earliest Manuscript of Mark's Gospel? (frstephensmuts.wordpress.com)
Labels:
Bart D Ehrman,
Daniel Wallace,
Debates,
Gospel of Mark,
James White,
Manuscript,
Mark,
New Testament,
Wallace
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Dr. Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament: The Secret Gospel of Mark
I heard of a "Secret Gospel of Mark" before this awesome post by Dr. Claude Mariottini. I heard of "Biblical scholar Morton Smith" and his discovery. The account I heard also says that no one else has seen this Gospel but him. It's also interesting to me that it seems to contain thing that to any modern mind could be construed as gnostic at best and painting Jesus as a homosexual as worst. I'm excited about this post because it gives access to a fuller article on this. I can't wait to read it.
Dr. Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament: The Secret Gospel of Mark
Dr. Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament: The Secret Gospel of Mark
Labels:
Bible,
Claude Mariottini,
Gospel of Mark,
Morton Smith,
New Testament
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
