dangerous idea: Never Ever Bludgeon Babies? You'll Get an Argument from Peter Singer and Michael Tooley

I'm really glad Dr Reppert posted this on his blog. I think the fact that infanticide and genocide are possible logical consequences of atheistic morality, if you are gonna be consistent about it. Take a look.

dangerous idea: Never Ever Bludgeon Babies? You'll Get an Argument from Peter Singer and Michael Tooley

William Lane Craig vs. Michael Tooley: Is God Real? - Apologetics 315

Brian Auten recently posted this debate on Apologetics 315. If you have heard Dr William Lane Craig debating the existence of God, you won't find any new arguments. I found this debate interesting in how bad Dr Tooley's arguments are. Why should Dr. Craig change what he's doing? His arguments work. I also found the interaction between the two interesting. The best Tooley had was the "Problem of Evil" and a misinterpretation of several scriptures and outright lies about Jesus. Tooley did not just loose because Craig is a better debater. Tooley lost because of bad unfortunate arguments.  

William Lane Craig vs. Michael Tooley: Is God Real? - Apologetics 315

Related articles

• William Lane Craig's refusal to debate John Loftus, or: Is WLC a Chicken? (choiceindying.com)
• William Lane Craig comes to Denmark! (factorysense.wordpress.com)
• Richard Dawkins VS William Lane Craig - who cares? (1minionsopinion.wordpress.com)
• Fishing for Compliments (josiahconcept.org)