Question Evolution! Campaign
Use this link to find out all about the campaign. The campaign was also written up in an article over at Creation Ministries International. You follow this link to read it.
The article even has a list of questions that are being considered problematic to the theory of evolution.
15 Questions summary
Note to would-be evolution defenders: please read the full brochure and linked articles before attempting to answer the questions, otherwise you will likely be wasting your time boxing at shadows.- How did life with specifications for hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
- How did the DNA code originate?
- How could copying errors (mutations) create 3 billion letters of DNA instructions to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
- Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
- How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
- Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed?
- How did multi-cellular life originate?
- How did sex originate?
- Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing?
- How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years?
- How did blind chemistry create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality?
- Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated as ‘science’?
- Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution?
- Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as the operational science?
- Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?
There is even a video to go along with this campaign.
If anyone thinks they can answer these, please do. Bring it if you can.
Maybe you should post this over at Jerry Coyne or P.Z. Myers' blog, and see what happens. Chicken to engage with actual biologist working in this field? Perhaps you'll learn something.
ReplyDelete#6 was great by the way. Snowflakes also look like they were designed, ergo...
PZ Myers? Jerry Coyne? Please be serious
ReplyDeleteWho says snowflakes are not designed? If God is in control of everything of course he is in control of that.
ReplyDeleteBok bok bok!
ReplyDeleteYou being a chicken explains the size of your brain.
ReplyDeleteWell said Marcus. You really got me there. But seriously, if you want actual answers to the above, why not try to get them from actual biologists? Granted, most of the questions are nonsense and show your ignorance (#6, really Marcus?) and also granted posting this at PZs would probably lead to a lot of name calling, but you might actually get some answers too.
ReplyDeleteYou are a coward, and you know it.
The fact that you think number 6 is nonsense shows just how out of touch with reality you are. And I can only take so much immature and foolish name-calling....I get my fill from you.
ReplyDeleteDo you seriously think biologist don't have theories for the origins of sexual reproduction?
ReplyDeleteAnd I can only take so much immature and foolish name-calling...
Wha! And while there might be the occasional immature and foolish name-calling, most if not all of it are simply statements of fact.
Do you seriously think biologist don't have theories for the origins of sexual reproduction?
ReplyDeleteI've looked and could not find any theory to explain where sexual reproduction came from. When did this happen? When life became multi-celled? How is sexual reproduction more of an advantage over asexual reproduction?
Wha! And while there might be the occasional immature and foolish name-calling, most if not all of it are simply statements of fact.
I haven't seen much of simply stating facts on his blog and never really seen it from you.
You looked? I find that doubtful, start with wikipedia, dumbass.
ReplyDeleteYou can't answer the question of the origins of sexual reproduction without also explaining the mechanism of how it developed or when. For example when why did it become more advantageous over asexual reproduction? I have not seen anything answering this. Furthermore, I'm still not convinced by the "article" your dredged up a while that attempted to explain how and why homosexuality evolved given that it does not lead to a continuation of population. You really seem to have drank the kool aid on this. You have Illustrated what blind faith looks like and it's not pretty.
ReplyDeleteI'm still not convinced by the "article" your dredged up a while that attempted to explain how and why homosexuality evolved given that it does not lead to a continuation of population.
ReplyDeleteWhat in the world are you talking about?
For example when why did it become more advantageous over asexual reproduction?
When or why?