Saturday, July 2, 2011

Calvinistic Cartoons: Open Mind Open Window

Better get you some screens!

Calvinistic Cartoons: Open Mind Open Window
Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel’s Mission in the World | Dr. Claude Mariottini – Professor of Old Testament

Ever thought about all the strings and events God put together for Israel? Does anyone really rationally think God would go through all of that, and all those people lived and died for no reason or that reason is now over? I don't think so. Dr Mariottini has written an article discussing what Israel's mission is. I use the term "is" because I don't think it's over.


25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way[e] all Israel will be saved. As it is written:
“The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27 And this is my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”
28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you. 32 For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.- Romans 10:25-32




Israel’s Mission in the World | Dr. Claude Mariottini – Professor of Old Testament
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 1, 2011

Faithful Thinkers: Video: Is Eternal Punishment Overkill?

Here is a great video in which Norman Geisler discusses the charge that eternal punishment is overkill for finite sins.




Faithful Thinkers: Video: Is Eternal Punishment Overkill?
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Daily Show With Jon Stewert Discusses The Supreme Court Ruling On Violent Video Game Ban - G4tv.com





The Daily Show With Jon Stewert Discusses The Supreme Court Ruling On Violent Video Game Ban - G4tv.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Atheism and Rape - Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Elucidates | True Freethinker

Mariano Grinbank has posted a really great article about the remarks of  Dr.Walter Sinnott regarding the morality of Rape. He offers insightful thoughts on the reasons why Dr Sinnott thinks that rape is wrong.

What makes rape immoral is that rape harms the victim in terrible ways. The victim feels pain, loses freedom, feels subordinated, and so on. These harms are not justified by any benefits to anyone.

My thing is that rape is objectively wrong because it's wrong. I've read that many men rationalize rape by thinking that their sexual prowess is so great that although a woman is initially resistant and in fact says "no", he can change her mind. Such men don't think they are causing women to suffer. In their twisted imaginations they think they are doing a woman a favor. How do you convince such a person that what they are doing is wrong?

Biblically, in ancient Israel, that is why rapists were executed. I don't think that executing rapists is what we need to do now, but I think just assuming that people know that its wrong to cause pain and suffering for others isn't going to work.

Atheism and Rape - Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Elucidates | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani Facing Imminent Execution in Iran for Apostasy and Evangelism

David Wood posted the following:

While CAIR complains about Islamophobia (in a country where Muslims are free to proclaim their faith from the rooftops), a Christian pastor is about to be executed by the Iranian government for leaving Islam and preaching to Muslims.

A news article is also posted, along with the following video explaining how Islam views apostasy and apostates




Answering Muslims: Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani Facing Imminent Execution in Iran for Apostasy and Evangelism
Enhanced by Zemanta

A Rosetta Stone for the Indus script [Video]





A Rosetta Stone for the Indus script [Video]

What to Do When the Police Want to Search Your Digital Devices



What to Do When the Police Want to Search Your Digital Devices


Enhanced by Zemanta

FacePalm of the Day #98 - Debunking Christianity: What Is Faith?

I've said it before, but I'll say it again: Atheists don't understand how the Bible defines "Faith".
Faith is pure wishful thinking, nothing more and nothing less. It offers a person a leap beyond what the probabilities actually lead us to think. For if something can be known to be the case we wouldn't need faith. Faith therefore is not a virtue when it comes to knowing the truth about anything. Skepticism is
There are two very important things to keep in mind. No one in all of the Bible was expected to just blindly follow something they couldn't hope to understand to any depth. That's not to say that we get to understand everything exhaustively. How can skepticism be virtuous when it comes to knowing the truth of anything? By definition skepticism is built on ignorance. One has no need for skepticism about something if you know something is true. The faith illustrated in the Bible is definitely wishful thinking or leaping in the dark. Biblical faith is built on past relationship with God. It is based on what God had really revealed.  Does anyone really think that the first time Abraham heard God speak to him was Genesis 12? Nope. Same thing with each every righteous man or woman in the Bible. It's the same for us today. Faith is a trust in God built on past experiences and working knowledge. If you don't know God, how could you have any faith? You can't. Explains John Loftus' total misconception of faith.

Debunking Christianity: What Is Faith?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 30, 2011

When Scholars Collide....

I have seen two very interesting exchanges over the past several day. Dr Victor Reppert vs John Loftus. on the "Outsider Test for Faith" concept. Loftus posted an open letter to Dr Reppert. The statement was challenging and defensive, but Dr Reppert responded anyway. Sure hope Loftus at least reads the response. It was a good one, but I doubt Loftus will understand it.

Just as interesting is the back-and-forth between Dr Paul Copan and Dr Matthew Flannagan  versus Dr. Hector Avalos on the morality in the Old Testament and how do do scholarship. Read Flannagan's latest post at his link
Enhanced by Zemanta

DC Comics Fans to Protest Superhero Relaunch at Comic-Con - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews

Well San Diego Comic Con 2011 is upon us. Turns out that there are quite a few people who are really not happy about the plans to reboot DC Comics continuity

More than 200 fans have pledged to attend what organizers are calling the "DC Original Protest Walk" at Comic-Con International in San Diego. Unhappy with what they've seen of DC Comics' superhero relaunch initiative, which goes into effect this September, participants intend to make their feelings known in what's presumed to be an outdoor demonstration, perhaps not dissimilar in format to what we saw last year when the Westboro Baptist Church protested the "sinful idolatry" they believed was inherent at Comic-Con.
I'm not sure but this article from Comics Alliance makes an insightful point:

Whatever you think about the practicality, dramatics or indeed madness of staging a political demonstration in response to decisions made about corporate-owned characters who do not exist, it cannot be denied that Comic-Con is the best place to do it. Although one must wonder why the protesters don't just attend the numerous DC Comics discussion panels that will be presented in the air conditioned comfort of the San Diego Convention Center, where they can put their concerns to the creators and editors directly, rather than stand outside and invite the abuse that we at ComicsAlliance will rain down upon them like a great and terrible fire from Heaven itself.



DC Comics Fans to Protest Superhero Relaunch at Comic-Con - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews
Enhanced by Zemanta

The History of English [Video]

There is a series of videos about the history of English in nice 10 minutes pieces. Here is Chapter One!




The History of English [Video]
Enhanced by Zemanta

iPhone vs. Android - Imgur

iPhone vs. Android - Imgur

An Image of the Apostle Paul | Dr. Claude Mariottini – Professor of Old Testament

A 1,400 year-old fresco depicting Apostle Paul in the news!!!!




An Image of the Apostle Paul | Dr. Claude Mariottini – Professor of Old Testament
Enhanced by Zemanta

Quote of the Week: Cornelius Plantinga | Reflections

I love this:

“This [Christian worldview] vision derives from Scripture, centers on the person and work of Jesus Christ, and grows rich from the contributions of ecumenical creeds, church confessions, and the thinking of such heavyweight theologians as Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin, and Barth.”
Cornelius Plantinga, Engaging God’s World (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), xv–xvi.


Quote of the Week: Cornelius Plantinga | Reflections
Enhanced by Zemanta

Faithful Thinkers: Article: Interpreting Creation: Hermeneutical Principles

Luke Nix has posted a great article in which Dr Hugh Ross explains the Hermeneutic used at Reason to Believe to come up with their science models for the origins of the Universe, Earth, and Humanity. Good stuff even if you don't completely agree with Dr Ross and his team.

Faithful Thinkers: Article: Interpreting Creation: Hermeneutical Principles
Enhanced by Zemanta

In Defense of the NIV 2011 | Bible.org Blogs

One of the most important things I learned in reading Dr James White's book The King James Only Controversy, was that every time there has been a new Bible translation there is always a firestorm of protests and persecution. Recently a new version of the NIV has been released and Dr Darrel Bock has written an article defending it. Follow the link to read the post.

In Defense of the NIV 2011 | Bible.org Blogs

NIV 2011: Every Last Change

Enhanced by Zemanta

Molinism from the Horse's Mouth: Reviewing Craig's "Only Wise God" - Part 2

Jamin Hubner has posted his 2nd post of his review on William Lane Craig's book Only Wise God.

Molinism from the Horse's Mouth: Reviewing Craig's "Only Wise God" - Part 2
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

YouTube - Prayer Circle

Sometimes we just need to be straight forward!!!



YouTube - Prayer Circle

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Author Interview: David Lamb - God Behaving Badly - Apologetics 315

Brian Auten's interview this week was with Dr. David Lamb It was a great interview. I thoroughly enjoyed it. He gave some really good answers to some questions about how the Old Testament and New Testament relate to one another and how God  This is a must-listen!

Author Interview: David Lamb - God Behaving Badly - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: Why Did Jesus Say, "The Father Is Greater Than I"?

Sam Shamoun answers one of the most frequently questions Muslims ask, "Why did Jesus say 'The Father is greater than I.'?"




Answering Muslims: Why Did Jesus Say, "The Father Is Greater Than I"?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Molinism from the Horse’s Mouth: Reviewing Craig’s "Only Wise God" – Part 1

Jamin Hubner is beginning a series in which he reviews and critics Only Wise God by William Lane Craig. He is doing it to get the most popular modern book on Molinism. I'm looking forward to reading his series. For anyone who might want to get a copy of William Lane Craig's book you can get it from Amazon.

Molinism from the Horse’s Mouth: Reviewing Craig’s "Only Wise God" – Part 1
Enhanced by Zemanta

FacePalm of the Day #97 - Debunking Christianity: What Jesus Christ Had to Say About the Outsider Test for Faith!

I'm not sure if this a joke or not, but what church leader in his right-mind would let John Loftus preach at his church in his absence. Is this a Unitarian Church or something? I don't think that there is anything wrong with an atheist like Loftus speaking at a Christian church, but I'm not too confident that Loftus will be able to talk to the congregation in truth and with respect. But let's assume for a second that he can and that Loftus will indeed  be preaching such a sermon as he describes.

This is my chosen title for a guest sermon I'll be preaching for the "One True Church of Jesus Christ That Has Ever Existed in History." The preacher is away on vacation. This church meets in a little building on "Faith" Street in a town called Saint Paul, Missouri, the "Show Me" state (never-mind the oxymoron). They have a membership of 10 people, all related to each other in some way. Here are my chosen texts. How should I develop my sermon?




I find it interesting that Loftus never identifies the exact name of the church or the pastor of that church. Loftus doesn't show the people or their Pastor any respect whatsoever. I hope he'll be kinder in person. And on top of that I think that considering how Jesus would apply the OTF a great idea.

Matthew 7:1-12
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye...So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
Loftus says he was once a preacher. I wonder how much time will he have. He says he is going to use 12 verses from Matthew 7 but on the post he only quotes verses 1-5, and 12. This is one of my favorite passages of scripture because I think it does explain how we are to interact with one another. So many people think Jesus meant that "judging" means calling others to a standard. The OTF itself requires making judgments. So I don't think that  Loftus is taking the view so many mistakenly take. Let's instead ask if this passage can be used to validate or invalidate Christians? If anything it validates Christianity and makes it plain how far we have fallen short in keeping it. It shows us what standard we should be living up to and we know that we haven't. Which is what Christianity teaches.

And then this one from Matthew 23:
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!...“Woe to you, blind guides!...You blind fools!...You blind men!"...“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!...You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel"...“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean. In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You build tombs for the prophets and decorate the graves of the righteous. And you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our ancestors, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’...“You snakes! You brood of vipers!
;-)

It seems to me that John Loftus thinks that these passages are some sort of slap in the face of Christians. It cuts Atheism to the quick. Any one who teaches that Jesus isn't who He said He is and that they are without sin and that we don't need God or His gift of salvation is that "brood of vipers".  They are hypocrites and "white-washed tombs",. In other words it describes atheists who try to turn people away from Jesus.  The passages prove that Christianity passes Loftus' Outsider Test for Faith.

Gee, I wonder why Lofus didn't point out that Jesus also said the following:

“If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea." - Matthew 18:6

Debunking Christianity: What Jesus Christ Had to Say About the Outsider Test for Faith!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 27, 2011

Common Sense is Tingling: Debunking Christianity: On Rejecting the Gospel Because of Sin

 John Loftus has written another confused defense for his sin.

That's the Christian claim, that non-Christians reject the gospel because we prefer to sin (or do wrong). Let's try to put this canard to rest.




That's not what Christians believe that is what the Bible says:

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.- John 3:16

Don't like it take it up with Jesus.

Do you, Christian, reject the Mormon faith merely because of its requirements? Do you reject the Muslim faith, the Buddhist way of life, Jainism, or the Jehovah's Witnesses because of their proscribed religious and moral duties? Some of them have much more strict requirements than your faith does. A Jainist does not eat meat. A Buddhist attempts to achieve a state of consciousness whereby he does not have any desires. A Jehovah's Witness refuses blood transfusions. A good Muslim woman will wear a burka. A Mormon wears magic underwear.

No, Christians rejects other religions because they conflict with God's revealed word.

If these religions had sufficient evidence for them no one would reject them merely because of what they require of us. But when it comes to sufficient evidence it must include all of the evidence, and part of that evidence is the moral and religious duties it requires of us if we were believers. If we were considering a militant Muslim faith that called upon us to kill people who didn't believe, this would certainly be relevant to whether such a faith is true. And there are certain things Christians think are required of God that are relevant to whether such a faith is true too, currently but not exclusively, misogyny and heterosexuality. Some Christians do not want to take their children to a doctor. Others are snake handlers. Others do not believe in birth control. Still others think the world is going to end soon and so they don't care about the environment or the possibility of war (and they run our country!) Others defend the Jewish nation no matter what and thereby have helped contribute to world instability. And the history of these requirements are relevant as well. The church believed witches and heretics should be killed and the church did not think slavery or misogyny was evil.

I don't see how any of these arguments in the above paragraph bear any weight on what the Bible says. Misogyny, snake handling, shunning medical attention, and all the other complaints have nothing to do with Biblical teachings. Sounds like you he has a problem with the way people who claim to be "Christians" have lived and not with God. God has a problem with such stupidity too.

So if sin is defined as certain actions I reject out of hand, then that is a relevant factor to my rejection of Christianity. I am indeed rejecting the gospel (which is embedded in the Bible as a whole) because I do not agree with its requirements as part of the total case against Christianity.

Sin is not defined as just certain actions. It is a predisposition to miss the mark - the standard of deeds, thoughts, and attitude that God's holiness demands of us! In short, Loftus is saying he rejects Christianity because he does not want to be held accountable to those standards God has set for us. No one does. That is the problem and why the need for a Savior is unavoidable. 

There is more.

There are specific religious duties to each religion and then there are moral duties people have to other people. I see no evidence that non-Christians behave any better or worse than Christians when it comes to moral duties to other people, obeying Jesus' second greatest commandment (if anything, religions cause more harm than good). This tells against Christianity because it is the one religion claiming God, the third person of the trinity, resides in the believer (in some sense) empowering them to be good to others.

God is not a person of the Trinity. God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Bible calls each God! But no where does it say God is Jesus or the Holy Spirit is Jesus. Everyone falls short of obeying the second Greatest commandment - Loving your neighbor as yourself - that is sin. And if you never had the Holy Spirit indwelling you then I can understand how one does not understand how the Holy Spirit helps us grow so we can more closely live up to that standard. Of course if you never had it, you've never been saved. You have never been born-again.

When it comes to religious duties like tithing, evangelizing, praying, church attendance, Bible study, and so forth, which makes up Jesus' first greatest commandment, I see no evidence that Christians behave any better or worse than non-Christian religious people when it comes to these duties, once we translate them into comparable acts. This also tells against Christianity because again it is the one religion claiming God, the third person of the trinity, resides in the believer (in some sense) empowering them to obey Jesus' first greatest commandment.

If Loftus thinks that loving God with all you have and are equates just to  "religious duties like tithing, evangelizing, praying, church attendance, Bible study, and so forth" it's no surprise how confused he is on what a Christian is. It's more than that. Its obeying God and putting Him first in every aspect of life. It's your lifestyle. I sure would like to know how an atheist has comparable acts.

People who do not believe in any religion look at this lack of evidence and conclude religion is man made. We simply dispense with Jesus' first greatest commandment as irrelevant and unnecessary for our lives.

Sure would like to know what Christians, Loftus has known. My experience has been opposite. I've seen God completely make over people. Turning their hearts to him. Making them better people. He's done it for me. Without the first Commandment (which by the way is the first of the 10 commandments), you cannot even begin to obey the second. 

4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. 5 Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. - Deuteronomy 6:4,5


Debunking Christianity: On Rejecting the Gospel Because of Sin
Enhanced by Zemanta

Who Killed Goliath? – Part 3 | Dr. Claude Mariottini – Professor of Old Testament

Dr Mariottini has posted his third post in his series about who to killed Goliath. Take a look at the article.

Who Killed Goliath? – Part 3 | Dr. Claude Mariottini – Professor of Old Testament
Enhanced by Zemanta

Debunking Christianity: Dan Barker vs. John-Mark Miravalle

This is a debate between Dan Barker and a Roman Catholic believer named John-Mark Miravalle. I thought that the debate went well for Miravalle but it's unfair for Dan Barker because he had the weaker argument. The one weak part I think about Miravalle's argument were with his theodicy, but Barker was unable to adequately exploit it because of his own weak presuppositions.




Debunking Christianity: Dan Barker vs. John-Mark Miravalle

Enhanced by Zemanta

FacePalm of the Day #96 - Debunking Christianity: The Ledge, a Pro-Atheist Movie to be Released July 8th

John Loftus has posted a clip from an upcoming movie called The Ledge.

Here's a clip with the standard Christian responses to reasoned arguments:




 I don't know what is more scary. The fact that Loftus thinks that the atheist character has well-reasoned arguments or that he thinks that those are arguments Bible-believing Christians would us or believe. I would have to say as a Christian, "Don't do this." The sad thing is that many atheists and Christian "discourses" degenerate to farces like this. Also aren't most Hollywood movies these days atheistic/agnostic? Yup!

Debunking Christianity: The Ledge, a Pro-Atheist Movie to be Released July 8th
Enhanced by Zemanta