With so many posting and sharing thoughts on Facebook,Twitter, and YouTube, ever wonder what would people think is important to you if they only had these social media posts to rely on? Intel has found a way to to take the posts, videos, and pictures you post and create a information graphic for you! Here's mine. It is not perfect, but it's still interesting. Follow the link at the end to find yours.
Intel Creates Infographic Generator That's All About You
Personal blog that will cover my personal interests. I write about Christian Theology and Apologetics, politics, culture, science, and literature.
Friday, April 20, 2012
This is Awesome: Magnifying the Universe [Interactive Infographic]
Here is an awesome and interactive infographic that allows you a really good understanding and scale of objects in our universe.
The Universe made possible by Number Sleuth
This is Awesome: Magnifying the Universe [Interactive Infographic]
The Universe made possible by Number Sleuth
This is Awesome: Magnifying the Universe [Interactive Infographic]
Labels:
infographics,
Scale,
Science. Solar System,
Size,
Universe
Thursday, April 19, 2012
The Physics Of Batman - G4tv.com
If anyone asks: The reason you need to know physics is so you can figure stuff like this out:

The Physics Of Batman - G4tv.com
The Physics Of Batman - G4tv.com
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Truthbomb Apologetics: Featured Article: Did Morals Evolve? by Greg Koukl
Chad posted a great article by Greg Koukl talking about the objection many atheist make against the Moral argument for the existence of God. They think that morality can be explained as having evolved. Koukl shows how much of a failed argument this it.
Truthbomb Apologetics: Featured Article: Did Morals Evolve? by Greg Koukl
Truthbomb Apologetics: Featured Article: Did Morals Evolve? by Greg Koukl
R2D2 Had Another Message - Topless Robot
The hologram of Tupac from last weekend has spawned quite a bit of memes. One has even been turned into a video!
R2D2 Had Another Message - Topless Robot
R2D2 Had Another Message - Topless Robot
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Ironic Sign and Hilarious Commentary
Today G4TV's Attack of the Blog had me rolling on the ground in laughter.
This Sign Didn't Take Its Own Advice
This sign, in all its irony, pretty much defines the experience of hand-writing an address on an envelope where the space caught up with you and you're desperately trying to squeeze a miniature zip code in the corner like it's some kind of freaky 5-number exponent.
This Sign Didn't Take Its Own Advice
Evidence Jesus is Alive by Timothy McGrew - Apologetics 315
Brian Auten posted Dr Frank Turek's interview of Dr Timothy McGrew about what evidence we really have for Jesus' Resurrection. Dr McGrew discussed an acrostic to make five points of evidence easy to remember: A.L.I.V.E.
A - Appearances of Jessus
L - Low Status of Women
I - Immediate Proclamation
V - "Voluntary sufferings undergone by the first witnesses"
E - Empty Tomb
Follow the link to hear the interview.
Evidence Jesus is Alive by Timothy McGrew - Apologetics 315
A - Appearances of Jessus
L - Low Status of Women
I - Immediate Proclamation
V - "Voluntary sufferings undergone by the first witnesses"
E - Empty Tomb
Follow the link to hear the interview.
Evidence Jesus is Alive by Timothy McGrew - Apologetics 315
Related articles
- Who are you to judge? Answering the challenge of moral relativism (winteryknight.wordpress.com)
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to Apologetics? (joshchalmers.wordpress.com)
- Curses! He's King! (a PG-13 apologetic for the Resurrection) (pasturescott.org)
Faceplant of the Day - Questioning God In the Face of Tragedy
John Loftus really believes that he understands and predicts what an omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient God would and would not do. Further he thinks that if anything happens or does not happen supporting what he thinks God would do, he concludes that God does not exist. This is evidenced in the case of the following quote.
I think the problem here is that Loftus refuses to think. When God intervenes in our lives, he doesn't always let us know that he intervened. The Titanic is an example in that if God had intervened in such a way that the iceberg never met the ship at all then we would not know that God intervened. Yet however, we have all had close call, where imminent harm was about to overtake us, yet it didn't. It's all under God's control. All a part of what He's doing. Sometimes you agree with the results of the intervention and sometimes you wish God had intervened differently. The way you know the difference between God and random chance comes down to Relationship. "Chance" is what you call God when you don't know Him. .
So where was God when the Titanic sank? God was working out everything after the counsel of his own will.
Where Was God When the Titanic Sank 100 Years Ago?
Just think, God could have foreseen this tragedy and miraculously averted the iceberg hours before the Titanic came into its path. If he had done this no one would be the wiser! He could have remained hidden if that's his goal. For believers to say God does this from time to time then his so-called "interventions" look indistinguishable from chance. In other words, there is no evidence that he intervenes at all. So having faith that God intervenes even once is exceedingly improbable.
I think the problem here is that Loftus refuses to think. When God intervenes in our lives, he doesn't always let us know that he intervened. The Titanic is an example in that if God had intervened in such a way that the iceberg never met the ship at all then we would not know that God intervened. Yet however, we have all had close call, where imminent harm was about to overtake us, yet it didn't. It's all under God's control. All a part of what He's doing. Sometimes you agree with the results of the intervention and sometimes you wish God had intervened differently. The way you know the difference between God and random chance comes down to Relationship. "Chance" is what you call God when you don't know Him. .
So where was God when the Titanic sank? God was working out everything after the counsel of his own will.
11 In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, - Ephesians 1:11
Where Was God When the Titanic Sank 100 Years Ago?
Related articles
- Experiencing History 100 Years Later Above The Site Of The Titanic Tragedy (philadelphia.cbslocal.com)
- The Titanic: A Lesson For Marriage (theromanticvineyard.com)
- Events mark Titanic's 100th (timesleader.com)
- Events worldwide mark Titanic centenary (myfoxny.com)
- Photographs mark aftermath of Titanic tragedy as survivors reach New York (scotsman.com)
Labels:
Bible,
Christianity,
FacePlant,
God,
John Loftus,
Omnipotence,
Omniscience,
Theodicv,
Titanic
North Korea Vs. South Korea - G4tv.com
I found this comparison amusing, along with the commentary by Joseph Baxter
North Korea Vs. South Korea - G4tv.com
Get it? Those North Korean kids are actually outside getting fresh air, doing some old-fashioned hard work, having some hair grow on their chests.I'm not sure if that is what the cartoonist had in mind!
North Korea Vs. South Korea - G4tv.com
Labels:
Asia,
culture,
G4TV,
Humor,
Korea,
North Korea,
Politics,
South Korea,
United Nations Security Council,
United States
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Greg Koukl on Faith, Reason & Rationality - Apologetics 315
Here is a great quote from Greg Koukl that I got from Brian Auten. It's timely given the confusion of what faith is that so pervades society.
Greg Koukl on Faith, Reason & Rationality - Apologetics 315
"So let's set the record straight. Faith is not the opposite of reason. The opposite of faith is unbelief. And reason is not the opposite of faith. The opposite of reason is irrationality. Do some Christians have irrational faith? Sure. Do some skeptics have unreasonable unbelief? You bet. It works both ways."
—Greg Koukl
In Is God Just a Human Invention? And Seventeen Other Questions Raised by the New
Greg Koukl on Faith, Reason & Rationality - Apologetics 315
Labels:
Brian Auten,
faith,
Greg Koukl,
QUOTES,
Reason
Saturday, April 14, 2012
FacePalm of the Day - Debunking Christianity: Is This Faith, Really?
John Loftus has posted the following quote. I still see a few problems in his thinking.
Notice in the chart Loftus posted that even the scientific claims are considered "virtually certain" as if things like Gravity, Continental drift, F=MA, and Heliocentric Solar System. I'm shocked. I would change this a lot. I have a background in Physics and if you have ever been educated in Physics at any university worth your time you would do experiments like measuring Gravity and proving Newton's Laws of Motion (Force equivalent to mass times acceleration is the second). Having worked through these things personally, I am more than convinced not just certain that they are true. As for Heliocentric Solar System, I'd count that as a certainty given that people have actually been to outer space and seen the solar system and given what we can measure. Grant it, I'd also would say that the Big Bang is also well-evidenced. I would say that evolution (macro-evolution with all life evolving from a single cell) is not probable at all. It's telling how Loftus seems to agree that Jesus' Resurrection, Atonement, Jesus' Second Coming, Prophecy, Incarnation, and Virgin Birth are "virtually impossible" despite the evidences that point to their validity. Shouldn't be a real shock since he seems skeptical of gravity.
So is there a difference between scientific faith and the religious faith, Loftus defines? Nope. Because he seems to think that they could both be wrong. That's not what Biblical faith is.
Debunking Christianity: Is This Faith, Really?
Loftus is still confused. Biblical faith is not believing something that is false or unevidenced. And people who call themselves Christians who think faith is believing something "that could conceivably be false" don't know what Biblical faith is either.Christians are saying I have faith because some say that "faith is assenting to a proposition that could conceivably be false." Okay then, let's compare a few ordinary scientific claims to a few extraordinary religious claims. Click on the chart to enlarge it. If I have faith then there is a gigantic difference between scientific "faith" and religious faith, wouldn't you agree? ;-)
Notice in the chart Loftus posted that even the scientific claims are considered "virtually certain" as if things like Gravity, Continental drift, F=MA, and Heliocentric Solar System. I'm shocked. I would change this a lot. I have a background in Physics and if you have ever been educated in Physics at any university worth your time you would do experiments like measuring Gravity and proving Newton's Laws of Motion (Force equivalent to mass times acceleration is the second). Having worked through these things personally, I am more than convinced not just certain that they are true. As for Heliocentric Solar System, I'd count that as a certainty given that people have actually been to outer space and seen the solar system and given what we can measure. Grant it, I'd also would say that the Big Bang is also well-evidenced. I would say that evolution (macro-evolution with all life evolving from a single cell) is not probable at all. It's telling how Loftus seems to agree that Jesus' Resurrection, Atonement, Jesus' Second Coming, Prophecy, Incarnation, and Virgin Birth are "virtually impossible" despite the evidences that point to their validity. Shouldn't be a real shock since he seems skeptical of gravity.
So is there a difference between scientific faith and the religious faith, Loftus defines? Nope. Because he seems to think that they could both be wrong. That's not what Biblical faith is.
Debunking Christianity: Is This Faith, Really?
Labels:
FacePalm of the Day,
faith,
John Loftus,
science
Desposyni: Greek Parsing App
I've been really enjoying Matthew Dowling's blog. Today, he pointed out a mobile app for parsing Greek available for Android and iOS devices. Yes, Please.
Desposyni: Greek Parsing App
Desposyni: Greek Parsing App
Labels:
Android,
Bible,
Bible study,
IOS (Apple),
ParseGreek
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Fistbump of the Day - Christ the Tao: Theology in Hades: Explaining Faith to Loftus and Pearse.
Well, I guess David Marshall has really been raising a stink over at Debunking Christianity because there are now posts dedicated to trying to "answer" his objections and points. More fail on top of fail. Fortunately, David Marshall has answered this post at the following link.
Christ the Tao: Theology in Hades: Explaining Faith to Loftus and Pearse.
Too bad I doubt anyone who failed to see how faith was misdefined and incorrectly explained will get most out of David's hard word, but God can move anyone's heart no matter how obstinate.
Christ the Tao: Theology in Hades: Explaining Faith to Loftus and Pearse.
Too bad I doubt anyone who failed to see how faith was misdefined and incorrectly explained will get most out of David's hard word, but God can move anyone's heart no matter how obstinate.
Labels:
faith,
Fistbump of the Day,
Theology John Loftus
Trayvon Martin's Killer Was Finally Charged With a Crime—Was It the Right One? - News - GOOD
Florida special prosecutor Angela Corey announced yesterday that George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman who killed 17-year-old black student Trayvon Martin in February, is being charged with second-degree murder. Justice served, right? Well, not so fast.Read more at the following link:
Trayvon Martin's Killer Was Finally Charged With a Crime—Was It the Right One? - News - GOOD
Labels:
culture,
George Zimmerman,
Law,
News,
Trayvon Martin
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
FacePalm of the Day - Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, By Yours Truly ;-)
I think the Christian delusion is harmful if for no other reason than that it weaken one's critical thinking skills. If faith is the basis for what one thinks then anything can be believed. It also adversely impacts us in polls that bolster the delusion in others, in donations to faith-based causes that are harmful, in TV, radio, and book buying habits that grant spokespersons for the delusion a bigger voice than warranted, and in voting patterns that place deluded people in power who in turn cause harm to individual people, one's particular nation, and the world at large.
I think that there is a serious problem. In Christianity there is no reason to believe everything, especially stuff that comes out of your own head. Christianity is about trusting God and building a relationship with God on God's Terms not your own.
Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, By Yours Truly ;-)
Labels:
Atheism,
Christianity,
FacePalm of the Day,
John Loftus
George Zimmerman To Be Charged In Trayvon Martin Shooting: Report
George Zimmerman will be charged with a crime(s) for shooting Trayvon Martin, but not for murder.
George Zimmerman To Be Charged In Trayvon Martin Shooting: Report
I get the feeling their throwing the public a bone because he isn't being charged with murder, but they did arrest him.
Corey announced earlier this week that she would not convene a grand jury in the case. Experts familiar with Corey's background say she has a reputation for avoiding grand juries in cases in which they are unnecessary. Under Florida law, murder charges can only be issued by a grand jury. Zimmerman may face other charges in the shooting death, including manslaughter and assault.Read more at the following link.
George Zimmerman To Be Charged In Trayvon Martin Shooting: Report
I get the feeling their throwing the public a bone because he isn't being charged with murder, but they did arrest him.
Labels:
George Zimmerman,
murder,
News,
racism,
Trayvon Martin
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Debate: William Lane Craig & Peter Atkins: Does God Exist? Audio and Video - Apologetics 315
Brian Auten posted the video and audio on the Apologetics 315 of William Lane Craig vs Peter Atkins during Craig's Reasonable Faith last fall.
Debate: William Lane Craig & Peter Atkins: Does God Exist? Audio and Video - Apologetics 315
Debate: William Lane Craig & Peter Atkins: Does God Exist? Audio and Video - Apologetics 315
Not All Dead Men Stay Dead: 10 Essential Points about the Resurrection | Reflections
| Српски / Srpski: Groblje_Sv._Marko (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Historic Christianity contains numerous beliefs that are theologically and philosophically volatile (in the best sense of the term). These powerful truth-claims have transformed the church and even turned the world upside down. My new book, 7 Truths that Changed the World, explores seven of historic Christianity’s dangerous ideas. The following 10 points give a brief overview of what I consider to be the Christian faith’s most dangerous idea.
Not All Dead Men Stay Dead: 10 Essential Points about the Resurrection | Reflections
Labels:
Christian,
Christianity,
Jesus,
Jesus resurrection,
Kenneth Samples,
Resurrection
Desposyni: Albert Mohler and Perspectives on Theistic Evolution
| Al Mohler, President of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Matthew Dowling has posted a good article summarizing and responding to a lecture by Dr Albert Mohler on perspectives on Theistic Evolution,. Given his background in Biology, Dowling's comments and insights are well worth reading! Follow the link to his blog to see a link to the lecture and read his comments.
Desposyni: Albert Mohler and Perspectives on Theistic Evolution
Related articles
- The Trouble with Theistic Evolution (str.typepad.com)
- Theistic Evolution Incompatible (str.typepad.com)
- Creationist: Science Begins with the Bible, Not the Facts (patheos.com)
- Dr.R.C.Sproul,Dr. Albert Mohler and Ravi Zacharias - Is Evolution Compatible with Christianity? (rodiagnusdei.wordpress.com)
Labels:
Albert Mohler,
Biology,
Christianity,
Evolution,
God,
Lecture,
Matthew Dowling,
Perspectives
Monday, April 9, 2012
More on Trayvon Martin case
U.S. News - Prosecutor: No grand jury for Trayvon Martin case
And Here is an article detail some of the mistakes law enforcement made in "investigating" the death of Trayvon Martin. Trayvon Martin Case Spotlights Florida Town's History Of 'Sloppy' Police Work
Answering Muslims: Paul Williams' "Scholarship" Pierced Through
Anthony Rogers has written an article discussing Islam and Jesus' Crucifixion and Resurrection. Check it out
Answering Muslims: Paul Williams' "Scholarship" Pierced Through
Answering Muslims: Paul Williams' "Scholarship" Pierced Through
Labels:
Anthony Rogers,
Crucifixion,
History,
Islam,
Jesus,
Resurrection,
Theology
Desposyni: Ministry in the Trenches: How to 'deal' with the old "What about the dinosaurs?" question
Here is a really good article about how to answer the "What about dinosaurs?" question regarding the Bible and Christianity.
Desposyni: Ministry in the Trenches: How to 'deal' with the old "What about the dinosaurs?" question
Desposyni: Ministry in the Trenches: How to 'deal' with the old "What about the dinosaurs?" question
Labels:
Book of Genesis,
Christianity and Science,
Dinosaurs
Sunday, April 8, 2012
FacePalm of the Day - Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, by Sir_Russ
John Loftus posted the following quote that illustrates the error many atheist make in understanding God and the nature of Biblical faith.
God isn't the 300 people who died in the plane crash. No, no, no. God is the one person who survived it. God is that unlikely event.
I disagree. God's hand is both in the 300 people who would die a plane crash and in the one who survived.
God isn't the death, mayhem, destruction and chaos of the tornado. No, no, no. God is the miracle puppy which lived through it.
No, God is responsible for both the tornado and the miracle puppy.
God isn't the hundreds of US children who die every year due to medical neglect by their Christian Science parents. No, no, no. God is the one who may have suffered needlessly, but didn't die.
One, where are the statistics that say that there are hundreds of children in the United States dying because of medical neglect from their Christian Science parents? Two, no where does the Bible tell us that getting medical attention is a sin. Three, God is not in Christian Science.
Christian faith is blindness to manifest horror in favor of comfort. Christian faith is picking over a cataclysm looking for anything to indulge their insatiable lust for feeling good. Link
Christian faith is not about turning your brain off or about feeling good. At its core, the Gospel cuts through pride and recognizing your own brokenness. Who expects to feel good about deserving to go to hell because of your sinfulness? The Gospel is the good news that Jesus redeemed us. We don't have to go to hell if we put our trust in Him. As for all the bad things that happen in the world, God does not owe us any explanation. I think Job put it best when his wife thought he should just give up his faith and integrity after they lost everything.
Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, by Sir_Russ
God isn't the 300 people who died in the plane crash. No, no, no. God is the one person who survived it. God is that unlikely event.
I disagree. God's hand is both in the 300 people who would die a plane crash and in the one who survived.
God isn't the death, mayhem, destruction and chaos of the tornado. No, no, no. God is the miracle puppy which lived through it.
God isn't the hundreds of US children who die every year due to medical neglect by their Christian Science parents. No, no, no. God is the one who may have suffered needlessly, but didn't die.
Christian faith is blindness to manifest horror in favor of comfort. Christian faith is picking over a cataclysm looking for anything to indulge their insatiable lust for feeling good. Link
Christian faith is not about turning your brain off or about feeling good. At its core, the Gospel cuts through pride and recognizing your own brokenness. Who expects to feel good about deserving to go to hell because of your sinfulness? The Gospel is the good news that Jesus redeemed us. We don't have to go to hell if we put our trust in Him. As for all the bad things that happen in the world, God does not owe us any explanation. I think Job put it best when his wife thought he should just give up his faith and integrity after they lost everything.
9 His wife said to him, “Are you still maintaining your integrity? Curse God and die!”
10 He replied, “You are talking like a foolish woman. Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?”
In all this, Job did not sin in what he said.- Job 2:9-10
Debunking Christianity: Quote of the Day, by Sir_Russ
Labels:
Atheism,
FacePalm of the Day,
faith,
John Loftus,
Quote,
Russ
Friday, April 6, 2012
Who are getting food stamps?
For the past several years politicians and the mass media lay the blame for America's financial issues at the feet of minorities (especially black, single mothers) on public assistance. They "reason" that such people milk the system and contribute nothing. Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney are not the first to make such kinds of statements. The thing is that such statements operate on the assumption that the majority of Americans who are on welfare are Black or Latino and/or some other racial minority. There are a couple of major problems.
1. Even if all black people in the US were on welfare (and we aren't all on welfare) we are all such a small percentage (we are a minority, remember?) I doubt that it would make a huge difference.
2. A higher percentage of people in the US are on welfare are white! Take the example of food stamps.
1. Even if all black people in the US were on welfare (and we aren't all on welfare) we are all such a small percentage (we are a minority, remember?) I doubt that it would make a huge difference.
2. A higher percentage of people in the US are on welfare are white! Take the example of food stamps.
Labels:
Mitt Romney,
Politics,
racism,
Rick Santorum,
wellfare
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Faceplant of the Day: Debunking Christianity: Playing God: The Loving Psychopath
Recently,John Loftus pointed out a YouTube video that obviously means to metaphorically equate humanity's relationship to God with those of human being and his ant farm.
There are so many mistakes in this video. The metaphor does not work . God is not like a man who made an ant farm out of stuff that already exists. The man organized the farm. He did not make the ants. He did not make the soil. He did not make the food the ants eat. On the other hand God, made everything. Not just organize reality but created everything that exists out of nothing.
Given that a man does not have control of anything that the ants do or what happens to anyone of them, the metaphor breaks down when you try to see God the same way. From God's perspective human beings have no more free will than ants/ And while the man is incapable of communicating with the ants in his farm, God is more than able to make Himself known to us. Just because some humans don't listen, doesn't mean that God does not speak or is incomprehensible.
If you want to make the metaphor perfectly resemble what God did, you would have to make the man become an ant, live as an ant, die as an ant for their sins and be resurrected! Without that, the charge that God is like a sadistic man who manipulates an ant farm. The thought is that the man is not worthy to be worshiped to be obeyed, and loved so the ants are owed something. The man of course is sinful and imperfect and fallible. God however is perfect. Of course he has the right to do whatever He sees fit.
Debunking Christianity: Playing God: The Loving Psychopath
There are so many mistakes in this video. The metaphor does not work . God is not like a man who made an ant farm out of stuff that already exists. The man organized the farm. He did not make the ants. He did not make the soil. He did not make the food the ants eat. On the other hand God, made everything. Not just organize reality but created everything that exists out of nothing.
Given that a man does not have control of anything that the ants do or what happens to anyone of them, the metaphor breaks down when you try to see God the same way. From God's perspective human beings have no more free will than ants/ And while the man is incapable of communicating with the ants in his farm, God is more than able to make Himself known to us. Just because some humans don't listen, doesn't mean that God does not speak or is incomprehensible.
If you want to make the metaphor perfectly resemble what God did, you would have to make the man become an ant, live as an ant, die as an ant for their sins and be resurrected! Without that, the charge that God is like a sadistic man who manipulates an ant farm. The thought is that the man is not worthy to be worshiped to be obeyed, and loved so the ants are owed something. The man of course is sinful and imperfect and fallible. God however is perfect. Of course he has the right to do whatever He sees fit.
Debunking Christianity: Playing God: The Loving Psychopath
Labels:
Atheism,
Christianity,
FacePlant,
God,
John Loftus
The Dunamis Word: The Resurrection Of Jesus, Critical Claims Debunked!
Elder Burnett has posted a brilliant summary of defenses against the critics of Jesus' Resurrection based on a book by Dr Gary Habermas. Take a look!
The Dunamis Word: The Resurrection Of Jesus, Critical Claims Debunked!
The Dunamis Word: The Resurrection Of Jesus, Critical Claims Debunked!
Labels:
Elder Harvey Burnett,
Gary Habermas,
Jesus,
Resurrection
Desposyni: How to Read the Bible through the Jesus Lens
Michael Dowling posted a video from YouTube of Michael Williams, author of the fine new book How to Read the Bible Through the Jesus Lens: A Guide to Christ-Focused Reading of Scripture (Zondervan, 2012), giving a discussion on his book.
Desposyni: How to Read the Bible through the Jesus Lens
Labels:
Bible study,
Jesus. Bible,
Michael Dowling,
Michael Williams
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
The Muslim Use of the Errant Unitarianism of Sir Anthony Buzzard
Dr James White has written a post on how some Muslims use the Unitarianism of Sir Anthony Buzzard to discredit Christianity. They seem to think that they have found a Christian who denies the Trinity therefore Trinitarians are wrong. Rather an irrational argument but they seem to think it flies. It more like crashes and burns. A three-part video is embedded in the post of a two-on-two debate between James White and Dr Michael Brown against Anthony Buzzard and another man who reject Jesus as God and Messiah. Also Dr White posts another video by a Muslim on YouTube who attacks Dr White and Christianity on the basis of the Trinity.
Dr White writes:
Follow the link at the end to see the videos.
The Muslim Use of the Errant Unitarianism of Sir Anthony Buzzard
Dr White writes:
If one does not assume unitarianism my comments are, well, obvious. Only by cutting, editing, and ignoring context, can Sir Anthony attempt to create confusion and hence contradiction. He refuses to allow for the distinction between being and person, and on the basis of that refusal, asserts contradiction on my part. Yet, my very definition is based upon the distinction in usage and referent for the terms "being" and "person". Hence, to reject part of my definition, import a different definition, and on that basis accuse me of contradiction is irrational. We have seen this error on Sir Anthony's part many times. But what is MuslimByChoice's excuse this time? He is citing a man who believes Jesus died and rose again. He believes Jesus is properly called the Son of God (in a much higher sense than Islam can possibly allow) and hence is someone who rejects the inspiration of the Qur'an and the prophethood of Mohammed. It is clear once again that MuslimByChoice chooses to use any source, no matter how inconsistent with Islamic doctrine, teaching, or history, as long as it looks like it is contradictory to the Trinity. Isn't it interesting to see how dependent Muslims are upon enemies of the Christian faith, like Bart Ehrman, for example? Rejection of biblical teaching makes strange bedfellows, to be sure!
Follow the link at the end to see the videos.
The Muslim Use of the Errant Unitarianism of Sir Anthony Buzzard
Labels:
Anthony Buzzard,
Debate,
Deity of Christ,
God,
Islam,
James White,
Jesus,
Michael Brown,
Muslim,
Trinity,
Unitarianism
Timeline of Trayvon Martin's Last Minutes - YouTube
CNN recently put together a timeline of what is thought to have happened the night George Zimmerman killed Trayvon Martin.
Timeline of Trayvon Martin's Last Minutes - YouTube
Timeline of Trayvon Martin's Last Minutes - YouTube
Labels:
CNN,
George Zimmerman,
History,
News,
Trayvon Martin
Top Ten Myths About the Resurrection - Apologetics 315
Brian Auten has written a post summarizing links to videos that debunk the myths about Jesus' Resurrection. Follow the link to his post!
Top Ten Myths About the Resurrection - Apologetics 315
Top Ten Myths About the Resurrection - Apologetics 315
Labels:
Brian Auten,
Christ Jesus,
Jesus,
Resurrection,
Resurrection of Jesus
Andrew Garfield on Spider-Man as Metaphor for Internet Trolling - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews
This particular article brings up a very interesting point about anonymity and how it can be abused.
Obviously Peter Parker is going to behave differently as Spider-Man than he will in his nerdy, unmasked idiom, but the Amazing Spider-Man sizzle previewed for the press last month featured a wall-crawler whose behavior went beyond the typical boundaries of vigilante bravado; something I described as "epic spider trolling." I was referencing a scene that's since surfaced of Spider-Man giving some foolish criminal a bit of the business, but a new interview with Amazing star Andrew Garfield confirms that the darker(/funnier) nature of internet anonymity is something he built into his performance as Spider-Man.
Labels:
Amazing Spider-Man,
Andrew Garfield,
culture,
Internet,
Interviews,
Spider-man
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














