Monday, May 23, 2011

Was Barack Obama Sr. 'eased' out of Harvard, and America, for dating white women? | Capital New York

Here is something that many "Birthers" would not want to discuss. Was the President's father a victim of Racism? Given that it was the early 1960's he probably was. My father sure did experience a lot of racism at the same time. Obama Sr, further added on to his provblem by marrying and dating white women. Some thing that got American Black men killed a lot of times then. Getting kicked out of Harvard was obviously hurtful but Emmet Till was killed not even a decade before and he was only accused of whistling at a white woman.

We know that Barack Obama Sr. died young, disappointed about many things. One of them, I have to imagine, was that his education at Harvard was cut short. Until now, it has typically been said that he "gave up" his doctoral studies, but this file makes it clear that he was never given a choice about leaving Cambridge. Who knows how his life might have turned out if he had been allowed to stay? Maybe he would have become an economics professor at some Northeastern liberal arts college, maybe he would have played a little more of a role in his son's life, and maybe his son would have never written Dreams From My Father, which would have been too bad, because it is a fantastic book and an unparalleled source of insight into the president's personal history and character.
For all the personal anguish described in that memoir, things turned out just fine for Barack Obama Jr. But we can't say the same for his father, who ended his life a disillusioned alcoholic, believing that he had been the victim of immense injustices. From reading this file, I think he had a pretty good case against the U.S. government.
At the the very least the file kept by the Immigration and Naturalization Service further confirms that the President's father was indeed married tohis mother and that the President was born in Hawaii. (In case there is still any doubt!!!)


Was Barack Obama Sr. 'eased' out of Harvard, and America, for dating white women? | Capital New York
Enhanced by Zemanta

Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Harold Camping to Speak Tonight

Well, its May 23, 2011 and Harold Camping's predicted Rapture did not occur. Nothing. Nada. Guess that means the Apocalypse isn't going to happen when he said it would either? Not so much. How do I know? Simple. The Bible does not say the things Camping said the Bible says. I was wondering what Camping would say today. Looks like he is going to answer his critics today on his radio program. This...I gotta hear. Apparently his organization is just going to continue "business as usual". I don't know how they can do that!





Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Harold Camping to Speak Tonight
Enhanced by Zemanta

Apologist Interview: Mike Felker - Apologetics 315

Well, Brian Auten has done it again.  This week he interviewed Mike Felker. Mike is a great writer and I highly enjoy and esteem his blog The Apologetic Front. I cannot recommend this brother's work highly enough. Brian asked Mike really good questions and this interview is really worth listening.

Apologist Interview: Mike Felker - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, May 21, 2011

I Know The Bible Is Right Lyrics -G.E. Patterson Lyrics -

KJV BibleImage by knowhimonline via Flickr



I Know The Bible Is Right Lyrics -G.E. Patterson Lyrics -
Enhanced by Zemanta

RaptureFail | Harold Camping is SO wrong

I heard this particular website from James White's podcast from May 19th. It's a good idea:

Joining in the RaptureFail project is really easy. Once 6pm Saturday has passed where you are, simply signup for an account on the website making sure you register your location. Once you’ve verified your account we’ll add your location to the RaptureFail map, building up a picture of all the places in theorld where Harold Camping’s prophecy has failed. Couldn’t be simpler!
Once you’ve registered your RaptureFail, see what others are saying here.
The site even summarizes Harold Camping's prophecy and points out some of its flaws. I agree with the following:

As Christians who take the Bible seriously we believe that “prophecies” like these demean the church’s witness in the world. The purpose of this site is to demonstrate very clearly (and to mock gently) that this is a false prophecy and that Harold Camping is a false prophet.

The sad thing is that that Camping's delusions turn the Rapture and Biblical teachings to a mockery. The important thing to remember is that Jesus is going to be returning and we don't know when. We need to be ready. If by some miracle, Camping has guessed right I've got nothing to worry about because I am saved according to what the Bible says. More important question is what about you? Are you ready for when Jesus returns, even if it is not May 21st?

RaptureFail | Harold Camping is SO wrong
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, May 20, 2011

Fallacy Friday: Equivocation - Apologetics 315

This week on Fallacy Friday, Dr Flannagan and Brian Auten posted an article defining and teaching about the Fallacy of Equivocation. 

Fallacy Friday: Equivocation - Apologetics 315

Thoughts on Predicting the End | Bible.org Blogs

Dr Darrell Bock posted his thoughts on Harold Camping's May 21st Rapture prophecy. I agree with him and its well worth reading.

Thoughts on Predicting the End | Bible.org Blogs
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Philip Greenspun's Weblog » Book of Mormon: South Park takes on theodicy

Philip Greenspun wrote a short review on a play that satires the Book of  Mormon by the creators of South Park. the thing that caught my interest was that the play deals heavy in Theodicy. The reason I'm calling attention to this is because of one of the comments, in which the reader affirms and defends Mormonism. He defends the most esoteric and Biblical contradicting views ascribed to Mormonism. Most young Mormons you talk to now haven't heard this stuff let-alone defend it.  I think it would be good to look at what the man says and hold it up against the Bible. My comments are in red.


Or better yet, the evening could be spent reading The Book of Mormon!
I haven’t seen the musical, but The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) theology brings several interesting things to the question of theodicy.

I've always wondered how Mormonism handled the issues Theodicy raises.

First it recognizes God’s omnipotence is limited, both by natural laws and his respecting our agency (freedom to choose actions, not consequences). For instance, on the natural law side, when God creates things, he does not do it ex-nihilo (see first law of thermodynamics) but through the process of organizing existing matter (or energy). Also, God will not force us to be good, he respects our freedom of choice, which is not to say there are no consequences for wrong choices or that he won’t help us to be good.

Limited omnipotence is not omnipotence. God cannot be bound  by natural laws because God created natural laws. Mormonism rejects the idea of God creating all reality out of nothing (ex-nihilo) and flies against what we know of from Physics. All of matter, time, space, natural laws like the laws of Thermodynamics, and energy came into being from the "Big Bang". God did more than just organize all of it, he created it. The Bible tells us that there is nothing that exists that God did not create. 

3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 
- John 1:3

We don't have the ability to be good on our own. All of our goodness comes from God himself. 

For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. - Romans 7:18

Paul wrote most of the New Testament. He wasn't just talking about himself but all of us too.

Second, many people suffer on earth, but when you understand The Plan of Salvation (described in The Book of Mormon) it is put into perspective, both that we all knew what we were getting into when coming to earth and that earth life (and the suffering here) is only a very small part of our existence, and that it helps us progress in two fundamental ways.

I once asked a Mormon missionary to show me where this is in the Bible - that we knew what about what life on earth was going to be like before we were born. He couldn't. The Bible clearly teaches that God knew of us..,planned us...but it's about God's sovereign will not ours. 

18 I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. 19 For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.
 22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. 23 Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies. 24 For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what they already have? 25 But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
- Romans 8:18-25


It's not that we don't have wills of our own, but God's will supersedes ours. Given that we are not able to even desire God on our own. If God does not replace our hearts of stone with hearts of flesh, there is no way we can be saved. God saves us despite ourselves. If He doesn't change us against our wills, we can't be saved.

 5 Those who live according to the flesh have their minds set on what the flesh desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. 6 The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace. 7 The mind governed by the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. 8 Those who are in the realm of the flesh cannot please God.- Romans 8:5-8

We all existed before birth as spirits and lived with our Heavenly Father before coming to earth, in fact before earth even existed. We were different from him in several ways, two being that he had an exalted body and he was more righteous than us. He presented a plan to us where by we could become more like him, and it consisted of us leaving his presence for a while by being born into mortality here on earth where we’d receive a body and be tried and tested and (hopefully) learn to choose the right.

And this is in the Bible where?!? The question here is what do you do if your theology conflicts with what the Bible says? The Book of Mormon disagrees with the Bible. They both can't be right. This is a different "plan of salvation" than the Bible presents to us.

All of us would sometimes choose the wrong and eventually die, losing our bodies, so a central part of our Heavenly Father’s plan was Jesus Christ and his mission to live a perfect life and save us from sin and from death through his Atonement and his Resurrection. Anyway, after resurrection, where we receive a glorified immortal body, we continue to live and progress. Originally when this plan was presented we knew that there would be opposition and pain here on earth, both by nature (earthquakes, floods, famine, etc) and by the choices of other men (rape, etc). Despite these chances for suffering, we believed out Heavenly Father that benefits we would receive from mortal life were much greater, and chose to come to earth. 1/3 of the spirits followed Lucifer and rebelled against God, Jesus Christ, and his plan and were expelled from his presence, yielding devils and all that jazz. Anyway, some friends are waiting on me to go out to dinner so there’s tons more check http://mormon.org
 
Mormons and Christians agree that Jesus is the way for salvation. We agree that Jesus lived a perfect life (free from sin) and He saves us from and death. However we mean very different things by "Atonement". We also mean very different things by what "eternal life" means. For a Christian it doesn't mean that a man becomes a god of his own planet over people living with his spirit lives, producing children. Considering the comment, it appears that the one who wrote it would agree, but that is not what orthodox Christianity teaches because it's not in the Bible. The Bible and the Book of Mormon can't both be true simultaneously. I've posted this video before but it appears that the commenter would have to agree with it as authentic Mormonism.

What Mormon Theology Is Really All About
Tags: What Mormon Theology Is Really All About



Philip Greenspun's Weblog » Book of Mormon: South Park takes on theodicy
Enhanced by Zemanta

Stan Lee's 'The Governator' Not Affected by Schwarzenegger Sex Scandal - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews

Okay, I've posted on this silly idea of a cartoon and comic book staring Arnold Schwarzenegger as a superhero. I'm not sure which is worse, this show or the fiasco in his personal life of destroying his marriage and hurting his wife and children. I'd say the personal toll on his family is worse because at least the rest of us can choose not to watch or read the "Governator", but he and his family are stuck with the decisions he made. We need to pray for the family.




Stan Lee's 'The Governator' Not Affected by Schwarzenegger Sex Scandal - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Dunamis Word: False Prophet ~ Countdown To Apostasy

Elder Burnett has posted a great article about the major times in the past in 200 years people have gave dates for the rapture of the Church and points out that it's no different today than with Harold Camping's prediction of May 21,2011. It is a great article. I did read the Bible, that is why I disagree with Camping. Read it at the following link.

The Dunamis Word: False Prophet ~ Countdown To Apostasy
Enhanced by Zemanta

Calvinistic Cartoons: Not The Odyssey But "Theodicy"

Ever read something so brilliant that you wish that you had thought of it? I experience that often when I read Eddie Eddings blog.  This was posted a while ago but it is just so awesome, I wanted to post it here so I will remember it.

Not the Odyssey but "Theodicy"
by Eddie Eddings

Habakkuk the Embracer
Clung to God with his two questions:
Had God vacated His throne?
Should I order my tombstone?
All this violence and contention
Within Judah I might mention.
It seems that justice and devotion
Took a trip across the ocean!

God answers, Judah will be punished
Observe and wonder, be astonished
For I am raising up Chaldeans
Big, bad, ugly human be-uns.

So get this vision little Hab
You can put it on my tab
Sin always carries a heavy price.
I'll crush Babylon like a bag of ice.

Woe, Woe, Woe your boat
Gently down the stream
Return to me with all your heart
I've promised to redeem.

So live by faith and you will see
I've never been an absentee;
The Chaldeans were never fancy-free
I used them like an employee.
They're not getting out of this scot-free
When I "cross my heart" it's a guarantee
So you can have a Jubilee!

P.S. someday I will visit Galilee
My Son will hang upon a tree
That's when you'll really be set free!



Calvinistic Cartoons: Not The Odyssey But "Theodicy"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Today is Malcolm X’s Birthday theeducatedfieldnegro: “I’m… | The Angry Black Woman

Malcolm XImage by cliff1066™ via FlickrOh wow!!!! I can't believe I forgot that today was Malcolm X's Birthday. Here is a quote from the Angry Black Woman's blog

theeducatedfieldnegro:
“I’m for truth, no matter who tells it. I’m for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” -Malcolm X
Happy Birthday El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz ?????? ???? ??????? (Malcolm X)

Today is Malcolm X’s Birthday theeducatedfieldnegro: “I’m… | The Angry Black Woman
Enhanced by Zemanta

Bart Ehrman’s New Testament Forgery Theory - Apologetics 315

Todd Wilken has had two very interesting programs on his podcast. In one episode he had Dr Bart Ehrman explain his theory that most of the Books of the New Testament are forgeries in that they were not written by whom the authors claimed to be. Most of the discussion centered around the 6 contested books that have been attributed to Apostle Paul.  Ehrman thinks only 7 letters were really written by him. Ehrman also discussed his contention that Apostle Peter did not write 2 Peter. Wilken also had a followup  program with Dr. John Warwick Montgomeryin which Montgomery interacted with Ehrman's statements and conclusions and explained why and where he disagrees. I'd really like to see these guys in a debate. I really appreciate Brian Auten calling attention to these and providing a link to an audio with the commercials edited out and both interviews back-to-back.

Bart Ehrman’s New Testament Forgery Theory - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Michael Moore: Some Final Thoughts on the Death of Osama bin Laden

“In fact, Osama bin Laden is a pilot of Americ...Image via Wikipedia I found this interesting opinion piece by Michael Moore. It's really well written and brings up a good point: Why were people treating the death of Osama Bin Laden as a party occasion when in the past the death of enemy leaders were not celebrated by the American public. I think it show just how much different current society is from past culture. I think relief, even gratitude, is warranted, but not joy. Read Moore's article by following the link below

Michael Moore: Some Final Thoughts on the Death of Osama bin Laden
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Does the Bible Guarantee Camping's Prediction?

Harold Camping in 2008Image via WikipediaIn a word? No. TurretinFan has explained very well why not Harold Camping's prediction is not Biblical.

Does the Bible Guarantee Camping's Prediction?
Enhanced by Zemanta

One of the Top Ten DL's Ever...Today

Yesterday was a good webcast of the Dividing Line. Follow the link t here the whole thing and there was a video posted from part of the show.




One of the Top Ten DL's Ever...Today

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Debunking Christianity: Did Paul Conceive of a Resurrected Body and if So Does this Change Anything?

WONDERS NEVER CEASE!!!! John Loftus actually posted a blog post that I largely agree with!!!!? Shock and Awe!!! God can really do anything!

At the very least what I do is grant for the sake of argument that Paul’s view was the transformation of the body of Jesus into an imperishable one, a supernatural one, but a body nonetheless, one that came from a mortal, perishable one. It was not a bodily resuscitation, nor was it probably a spiritual resurrection leaving his body still lying in the grave. This grants more than most skeptics or liberals will allow, I know. I want to take the best case scenario and see what follows. I don’t think it follows that Jesus bodily rose up from the grave.


It fills me with hope that John Loftus can really read a Bible passage and understand what it says even if he doesn't agree with it. Of course taking this stand means that he disagrees with Dr. Robert Price that Paul believed in a physical Resurrection. Price says he didn't. I agree with Loftus that he did. I see no way that one can honestly come form to Price's conclusions for the same reasons Loftus enumerates in his posts. The bottom line is that Paul did believe that Jesus rose bodily from the grave. Now there can be a discussion as to whether or not Jesus did.

Instead of nitpicking the article, let's look at the first comment from Samphire:

Take a grain of wheat and burn it; grind up the carbon remaining and throw it in the sea. No new plant.

Take a christian (dead or alive) and burn it; grind up the carbon remaining and throw it in the sea. No new christian.

So is Paul just playing with words? Does his theology reflect itself in any reality?

We need some flesh of meaning on these dead bones of scripture. Even WLC doesn't seem to have a clue as to what a glorified body is. If there is any real meaning to what Paul was preacing surely after 2,000 years of discussion somebody should have some sort of clue. But it seems not.

And what did the Pillars think of Paul's teaching? There is not a single word on the subject in the epistles of James, John or Peter. What does that tell us?


If God could call all of reality into existence, restoring a cremated body should be easy! Paul does not try to explain what a glorified body is in detail. Only that it was physical. I see nothing wrong with that. Oh and we do know what Peter thought of Paul's teaching!

14 So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him. 15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction. - 2 Peter 3:14-16


Twisting Paul's letters into distorted lies is something I see often in our culture today.

Debunking Christianity: Did Paul Conceive of a Resurrected Body and if So Does this Change Anything?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Iron Sharpens Iron: James White: Harold Camping and the End of the World

Harold Camping in 2008Image via WikipediaJames White was on Iron Sharpens Iron regarding the May 21, 2011.  It was a great interview. I got a lot out of it. The best part was that  Dr White answered the burning question I had: If Jesus said no man knows the day or hour of the time of his Second Coming, why would Harold Camping think he does? I had never heard of Camping ever giving an answer but Dr. White did say how Camping tries to avoid that problem. Here is  a hint: Some of the most creative eisogesis I have ever heard.

Iron Sharpens Iron: James White: Harold Camping and the End of the World
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: Tonight on ABN: Sam Shamoun vs. Inamullah Mumtaz on the Identity of Muhammad






Answering Muslims: Tonight on ABN: Sam Shamoun vs. Inamullah Mumtaz on the Identity of Muhammad

I Hope Arnold Schwarzenegger Plays His Cheating Self In the Movie Version of His Life - The Snob Blog - Danielle Belton's The Black Snob

Arnold Schwarzenegger speaking at the lighting...Image via WikipediaI have heard of this story before but I think Danielle Belton nails this story and succinctly summarizes and comments. To be honest I've heard of Schwarzenegger's infidelity for years. I used to wonder why Maria Shiver put up with that. Given that she is from the Kennedy family and that they seem to think that it is okay for men to cheat on their wives, I've always thought that is why she stayed. I'm glad that she has decided to not put up with it. Read Ms Belton's take on the news. I sure hope that other Politicians don't bad mouth Arnold. It's not like any of us can throw stones. All of us are sinners, even if we haven't done what he did. God can fix this. God can fix anything.


I Hope Arnold Schwarzenegger Plays His Cheating Self In the Movie Version of His Life - The Snob Blog - Danielle Belton's The Black Snob
Enhanced by Zemanta