Here is a look at 10 prominent relics, their histories, and the ongoing debate regarding their authenticity.
1. The Crown of Thorns
Location: Louvre Museum (formerly Notre-Dame), Paris, France
Background: Brought to France by King Louis IX in the 13th century, this relic consists of a circular bundle of rushes. Interestingly, the actual "thorns" were distributed as gifts to various monarchs over the centuries, leaving only the braided ring in Paris.
Is it valid? Possible, but unproven. Botanical analysis confirms the rushes are from the Levant region, and the provenance is documented back to the 4th century in Jerusalem. However, there is no way to scientifically link it to 33 AD.
Source:
2. The True Cross
Location: Fragments in Jerusalem, Rome (Santa Croce in Gerusalemme), and various cathedrals worldwide.
Background: Legend credits St. Helena, mother of Constantine, with discovering the cross in a cistern near Calvary around 326 AD. It was later divided into thousands of tiny splinters.
Is it valid? Highly Debated. While John Calvin famously quipped there was enough wood to fill a ship, modern microscopic analysis suggests the total volume of known fragments actually only makes up a fraction of a full cross. Many fragments are authentic 1st-century wood, but their specific use remains a matter of faith.
Source:
3. The Holy Nails
Location: Milan Cathedral; Santa Croce in Gerusalemme (Rome); Trier Cathedral (Germany).
Background: Tradition states Helena found three or four nails. One was supposedly forged into a bridle for Constantine’s horse, and another into the "Iron Crown of Lombardy."
Is it valid? Inconclusive. The nails have been recast or filed down over centuries. While the metal is ancient, identifying them specifically as the nails used on Christ is historically impossible.
Source:
4. The Titulus Crucis
Location: Basilica of Santa Croce in Gerusalemme, Rome.
Background: This is the wooden board inscribed with "IESVS NAZARENVS REX IVDAEORVM" (Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews). It was allegedly brought to Rome by St. Helena.
Is it valid? Doubtful. Radiocarbon dating performed in 2002 dated the wood to approximately 980–1146 AD. It is likely a medieval "faithful copy" of an earlier relic.
Source:
5. The Holy Lance (Spear of Destiny)
Location: Imperial Treasury, Vienna; St. Peter’s Basilica, Rome; Echmiadzin, Armenia.
Background: This is the spear used by the Roman soldier Longinus to pierce Christ’s side. The Vienna lance contains a nail said to be from the Cross.
Is it valid? The Vienna Lance is 8th-century. Metallurgical testing confirms the Vienna spear is Carolingian. However, the Armenian lance has a much older, albeit shrouded, provenance.
Source:
6. The Seamless Garment (Holy Tunic)
Location: Trier Cathedral, Germany.
Background: The robe Christ supposedly wore before his crucifixion, for which the Roman soldiers cast lots. It was also reportedly sent to Trier by St. Helena.
Is it valid? Uncertain. The garment has been preserved in layers of protective silk for centuries, making direct dating difficult. Its history is solid back to the 12th century, but earlier records are sparse.
Source:
7. The Holy Shroud of Turin
Location: Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist, Turin, Italy.
Background: A linen cloth bearing the negative image of a man who appears to have suffered physical trauma consistent with crucifixion.
Is it valid? The Ultimate Mystery. 1988 Carbon-14 dating placed it in the Middle Ages, but those results are heavily contested due to potential sample contamination. The "how" behind the image remains scientifically unexplained.
Source:
8. The Column of the Flagellation
Location: Basilica of Saint Praxedes, Rome.
Background: A small, marble column brought from Jerusalem in 1223. It is said to be the post where Christ was tied and scourged.
Is it valid? Plausible. The stone is "Aswan granite," common in the Roman era, and the style matches columns used for Roman punishments. Whether it is the specific column is a matter of tradition.
Source:
9. The Sudarium of Oviedo
Location: Cathedral of San Salvador, Oviedo, Spain.
Background: A bloodstained cloth said to have been wrapped around the head of Jesus after his death.
Is it valid? Strong Correlation. Unlike the Shroud, the Sudarium has a documented history back to the 7th century. Critically, the blood type (AB) and the patterns of the stains match the Shroud of Turin perfectly, suggesting they covered the same face.
Source:
10. The Holy Sponge
Location: Basilica of St. John Lateran, Rome.
Background: Mentioned in the Gospels, this sponge was dipped in vinegar and offered to Christ on a hyssop branch.
Is it valid? Inconclusive. The relic in Rome is a brownish, porous fragment. While sponges were common Roman tools, there is no forensic way to verify its specific use at Golgotha.
Source:
Final Verdict: While science has debunked some (the Titulus) and cast doubt on others (the Shroud), for the believer, these objects serve as "icons"—physical windows into a spiritual reality. Which of these relics do you find the most compelling?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
To some, the Crucifixion is just a legend.
— Trad West (@trad_west_) April 3, 2026
But for 2,000 years, Christians have safeguarded the evidence.
These are 10 holy relics of Christ’s Passion that still exist today:
1. The Crown of Thorns in Notre-Dame, Paris.
2. The True Cross in Jerusalem, Rome, and beyond
3. The… pic.twitter.com/3w1RR8z1ff
