Some Folks Do Not Know When To Quit

Some one has actually put together a website called www.HowObamaGotElected.com and they will be producing a documentary called "Media Malpractice". Obviously the producers are suggesting that the media swayed the nation to elect Obama. They gave a Sarah Palin the chance to be interviewed on how she thinks of the media.

A New Tablet Device

At this week's CES in Las Vegas there was announced new tablet device: Giinii Movit Mini. It's an IPod Touch like device but it's runs the same operating system as the G1 Phone: Android. It seems really nice. Unfortunately, it doesn't have as much software and support as the IPhone, but the potential is there. Look at the following links for more information.

Google Android Tablet No Threat To Apple iPod Touch -- Yet (GOOG, AAPL)

Hands On Giinii Movit Mini: The Android Tablet

Sony's Answer to Apple: "Oh, Yeah?"

In the 1980's, Sony set the standard in personal media content players with its Walkman. Everyone had one. Sony's monopoly on that market dried up in 2000 when apple released its first IPods. Apple quickly refined its technology to not just include music and audio content but also video and web browsing. I for one thought that Sony had given up on this market and let Apple and Microsoft (with is Zune players) have that market. I was wrong. Their "IPod Killer" was announced this week, referred to as "Touchscreen Walkman". Here is a blurb from G4TV's blog:

The NWZ-X1000 features a 3-inch OLED touchscreen, WiFi, noise-canceling and comes in two sizes: 16GB and 32GB. That, my friends, is all anyone knows about it. No doubt Sony is saving the juicy details for the press conference they're holding in the next hour, so keep your browser pointed to G4's CES 2009 coverage for a live blog of all the juicy Sony details.

Personally, I would like more on board memory space. Grant it, it may have SD Card support. I don't know because I haven't seen Sony's Press conference yet. I hope I can see it on G4TV tonight. That is one gripe I have against IPods is that there is no expandable memory capability. This is offset by the ease of connecting a computer to an IPod and seemlessly managing your content, but I admit it: I'm lazy. I'd rather pack music and videos on my personal media player on and on without end. Another thing that lessens my enthusiasm towards the new Walkman is that Sony is rumored to come out with a tablet version of the IPod Touch. It will do everything the IPod devices currently do but with a bigger screen! I love large screens. So unless Sony really impresses us with more features in the Walkman, they should stick to PS3s, PSPs, DVD/BluRay players, and HD televisions!

Mocking Theism

I came across this video from the Makers of the shows Family Guy and American Dad. It's irreverent and maybe even offensive to people like me who believe that the universe was purposely designed and not haphazardly evolved. For this reason, I'd classify it as not just anti-Christian but also anti-Theistic. Theism is the belief that there really does exist a God. However the mocking of Jesus dying for us is a swipe of Christianity. If you are offended by this video, then I apologize. I'm not posting it because I agree with it, but because it reminds us of the mindset, attitudes, and thoughts that we are up against. It is an awesome opportunity to do Apologetics. This video show Seth McFarlane's worldview. What does God have to say about it? What do you have to say?



Here are the three points and objections raised in the video:
1. Evolution means that we evolved from other animals, and Christianity say that God made us
2. How do we know God is a monkey?
3. How do we know God loves us?

The video shows a little boy coming to his father and asking legitimate questions. The humor is supposed to come from the characters being monkeys giving "religious" answers to good relevant questions. The answers are stock "religious" dogma that does not really answer anything and makes Christians sound like there is no reason why we believe what we believe. No where in the Bible does God entirely equate himself to be like us. It's like asking, "How do we know God is human?". To answer this you have to study what the Bible teaches about God's nature and identity.

The monkey is right. We know that God loves us because of Jesus' died for us redeeming us from sin and total death. It's just tossed out there, like only a moron would except it. However there are good reasons to accept this. You don't have to take the assertion at face value. You can research it for yourself.

Evolution does not answer some major questions. Like where does self-awareness and consciousness come from? Where does art come from. Did it evolve how? The Bible however does give an answer. It says that we were created in God's image. We make art because God is creative. We are self-aware because God made us so. There is no explanation for how the electrical impulse in a human brain give rise to personality or consciousness.

Look, Ma, No Keyboard!

Today at the MacWorld conference, Apple has announced a keyboardless notebook. It looks nice. Instead of a keyboard, the notebook has a wheel like the input interface of an IPod. My wife has an IPod Nano and it has such a wheel. It does make navigating and making selections easy, I'm not sure about typing on the thing. There's a demo on YouTube. I was excited about it until I saw the process to type on it. Does not seem easy or intuitive to me at all. See what I mean:

Canonicity Part 6: Gospel of Judas

In the 1970's an ancient book, lost for about 1,700 years was rediscovered. In 2006, it was translated into English and made available through National Geographic. It is called "the Gospel of Judas". It caused a firestorm of controversy because it does not present Judas or even Jesus the way they are depicted in the 4 canonical gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Judas isn't presented as a betrayer but Jesus' partner. Jesus gives Judas special knowledge that he does not share with the other 11 disciples. This information of what is said about their relationship, not to mention Jesus' very personality is really at odds with what we know from scripture. This in the very least should tell us not to take The Gospel of Judas as scripture.

However, our culture today is searching for "alternative understanding" apart from historic Christianity. There is this push to put Jesus on par with every other religious founder/leader like Buddha or Muhammad. That is why the Gospel of Judas caught a lot of attention. It does not hold up Jesus as God, incarnate, who died to propiate the sins of humanity and rose again physically three days later like He said He would - thereby restoring the relationship between believers and God. Jesus died in my place, paying for the sins of my life. This is the gospel according to historic Christianity and is stumbling block at bet best and an offense at worst to the unregenerate human mind. Unregenerate means someone who does not yet believe the gospel as spelled out for us in Scripture.

If you read the Gospel of Judas below you will see none of that is there. It is a gnostic text. Gnosticism was a cult that came to prominence in the 2nd and 3rd Centuries. It was repudiated by those who held to the scripture we believe today. It bears no resemblance to Christianity despite the claim that Jesus is at its center. The text itself has no proof to ties to the historical Judas nor anyone who personally knew him or Christ. We can't date it any earlier than 150 AD unlike Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. It was written in the Coptic language. Coptic is modified Greek so that it can be easily used to translate ancient Egyptian writing. It is good to note that many copies of gnostic texts we do have are Coptic while oldest canonical scriptures we have are in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic which are most closer to the languages spoken by the people who are depicted in scripture.

When it comes to the Bible, we do a lot of "revisionist history" in our culture. Some have suggested that Judas wasn't all that bad. That maybe he did not really understand that they were going to execute Jesus...and he thought that the he was just trying to point him out. You can't get any of that out of the canonical gospels. The Gospel of Judas takes the added step of suggesting Judas was the closest disciple to Jesus, and Judas was under orders to do what he did. It suggests collusion not betrayal. It is so different...but a lie...that is why it caught a lot of attention and then dropped out of media consciousness. The Gnostics were not a monolith of opinion. They widely varied. The Gospel of Thomas (which is another farce some what to shoe-horn into the canon) suggests that Mary Magdalene was the closet disciple to Jesus. Notice that there is no real disagreements in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John and I invite anyone to research and they will find none.

You may be asking, "How do I know that the I am not missing anything I need to know about God by not have The Gospel of Judas in my Bible?" Answer is simple: check it out. You can't make it gel with the other 66 books in general or the 4 Gospels in particular. That alone is enough to ignore it as scripture. Read it for yourself it you don't believe me.

Get your own - Open publication

Apologetics 315: Bart Ehrman and Peter Williams MP3 Audio

Apologetics 315: Bart Ehrman and Peter Williams MP3 Audio

I just found this on the Apologetics 315 blog. It's worth reviewing. We need to know how to defend the the authenticity of the Bible. We need to know what we believe, why we believe it, and how to articulate it.

Offending Jews - Embrassing Christians - This is How Not to Witness

Everyone who has heard of Ann Coulter knows that controversy follows her everywhere she goes. Unfortunately, unless you are a white evangelical republican then mostly likely she is offensive to you. I saw a video of her being interviewed by a Jewish American. She was asked what was her perfect dream of what America would be like. Unfortunately, her idea of "utopia" does not match God's ideas in the Bible. I don't like the way she explained why should we all be Republican and Christian. She came off as kind of ignorant. I mean citing "Seinfeld" as an accurate picture of society? She seemed arrogant and uninformed on what "perfected" Jews are. She does accurately point out that Jesus died for the sins of all. She did not have the time to fully explain salvation with respect and gentleness. It was a meltdown and did not advance the kingdom of God at all. To be honest, I hate that when people think of Christians, they think of her. It's a scary world. Take a look. It's a great example of how not to witness.

Four Year-Old Shoots Babysitter

What kind of world is it when a four year-old child premeditatively shoots another human being? I saw a news article today stating that a four year-old boy, angry because his teenaged babysitter accidentally stepped on his foot, announced that he was going to get a gun, left the room, went to where the adults hides a gun and to the separate place where the shells were stored, loaded the gun and then shot his babysitter, wounding him and another teenager. In Ohio!!!!? Not some inner ghetto. I'm still shocked. What I want to know is what has this child seen that makes him think that shooting someone is effective conflict management? And how does a four year-old learn to load a gun, let alone shoot straight enough to hit an intended target? No words.

I'm sure someone would try to blame violence in the media - video games, movies, and television. I blame the sins in the human heart that we are all susceptible to. My own two year-old daughter sometimes hits people when she is angry with them. I know I was the same way. My parents taught me that it was wrong to hit people no matter what they say if I'm not defending myself. I do the same thing for my daughter. More frightening is the lack of compassion and empathy shown by the calculated action that boy went through to. I mean think of it. He had to find the gun. Find the ammo. Load the ammo - one shell. He knew what he was doing. Some will argue that he was too young to understand that he could kill someone. I'm not so sure. Be that as it may I can't say since i don't know the boys heart but I notice a lot of children seem to be lacking compassion. My own daughter, thankfully, shows that she cares about other people when they say ouch or visibly unhappy. She asks "You, Okay?" If this is something you are born with? Is it taught? I don't know but it should be praised and encouraged. If not, more things like this is going to happen....and will be worse when they grow up.

Heroes: The Recruit pts 3 &4

The Third and Fourth parts of the Heroes webisode series known as "The Recruit" has been released.

Part 3: "Do What We Have To Do"


Part 4: "Day of Reckoning"

Nephilim: Not Mutations

As I have written about concerning the Nephilim, some think that Genesis 6 describes Angels marrying Human women and having children, calling them the "Nephilim". Let us look at the scripture in which they are first mentioned in Genesis 6:4 -

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

For a long time I've wrestled with this. The understanding of who the Nephilim were is determined by two facts that the Bible gives about them:

1. The fathers of the Nephilim are called "the Sons of God" - as so many people point out that the Bible uses this title for men and angels.
2. The Nephilim were on the earth "in those days" (before the flood) and "afterwards".
3. The King James Version and many English translations translate "Nephilim" as "giants" instead of the literal translation: "Fallen ones". We are told that they were men and special: "men of reknown".

I found a video on the Internet in which a Pastor explains the two major ideas about who the Nephilim were and he said the same thing that my own Pastor teaches: The Nephilim were not half angel, half human mutations, but just men - fallen and wicked men. Although, I heard my Pastor and know he's right, I still struggled. Why? I see now that I had an itching ear for the other explanation. I have a bias towards science fiction. There is a part of me that finds interesting the idea of angels (turned demons) having children to pollute the human gene pool to try to divert God's plan to redeem humanity. Noah is chosen because he and his family have a pure bloodline. Sounds like a movie (I think I've seen it) doesn't it. The problem is that it has got all the problems that my Pastor, Fredrick Stewart, and Pastor Scott Richards have pointed out. To me nail-in-the-coffin is the point that if point of the flood was to wipe out Nephilim, then we havean example of God failing because there were Nephilim on the earth afterward! That can't be true because you can't fit it in with the rest of scripture or history.

Here is a video of Pastor Scott Richards explaining who the Nephilim are:


I have also found a video on GodTube that asserts to show a picture of a large human-type skeleton uncovered in Saudi Arabia. The problem is that I can tell the one who posted this video is intending to prove that the Nephilim were giants because they were the offspring of Angels and humans. I don't have an answer for why there were nations of giants - people who were 9 ft tall like Goliath. The one thing I am now sure of is that the Nephilim are not the descendants of Angels. Here is video of the "giant" found in Saudi Arabia.


The pictures of this post shows that there are a great many of people who believe that the Nephilim were the offspring of angels and humans. Fortunately, there is no scripture that backs it up.

Canonicity Part 5: Gnostic Texts

Just because a manuscript is ancient does not mean that it's inspired. There are rumors that say that there are other "gospels" and other "Christian" writings that give alternative views of Christianity that were suppresed and hidden by the church because they challenged ecclesiastical authority. These are the unlying assumption and assertions of many critics and attackers of historic Christianity today, including the Da Vinci Code novel and movie. The thought is that had these other texts been accepted then Christianity would be different than it is now. That much I believe is true.

We live in a culture where the term "Christian" means very many different things to different people. I do not think for a moment that just because a text says it was written by someone who claims to be someone who knew Jesus, or claims to contains the words of Jesus Himself or from God does not mean that the text is "Christian". I put "christian" in quotations because I do not consider them "Christians" because they do not believe or teach what Christians has historically taught. Our Bible has 66 books, and these books that were "excluded" contain information that is contrary to what the 66 teaches. How do we know that they should be excluded?

First, Many of these texts that people use to substantiate the theory that Jesus was married to Mary Magdelene are from this branch of texts. Traditionally, we call these texts psuedographs because we do not know who wrote them and they can only be dated to the second or third centuries AD. Books like the Gospel of Thomas are dated way too late to have been written by the Apostle Thomas.

Second, Many of these texts are referred to as "gnostic". Gnosticism was a sect that believed that Jesus was not human. That there was no physical resurrection. They thought that sin, heaven, and hell are all in the mind. Their Jesus apparently passed on secret knowledge to the disciples. The problem is that most of what they say is contradicted by the Biblical canon.

Third, I defy anyone to show how these "excluded" books fit the defintion of scripture.

All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
- 2 Timothy 3:16,17

We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For he received honor and glory from God the Father when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory, saying, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased." We ourselves heard this voice that came from heaven when we were with him on the sacred mountain.

And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. 2 Peter 1:16-21

Hitchens Is Finally In For A Challenge

I read an announcement on Apologetics 315 about an upcoming debate between Dr. William Lane Craig and Christopher Hitchens. The throw down is scheduled April 4, 2009. The topic will be: Does God Exist? I'm really excited to see this one. I can't wait. I've been wanting Hitchens go against someone who can argue against his tirades against the accuracy of the Bible from the stand point of History and Archeology. To show that believing that the Bible is the inspired Word of God is reasonable, tenable, and the only honest response to the evidence we have. Dr. Craig will have his hands full. I've watched Hitchens before. He is intelligent, but misguided. He genuinely believes he's right and he has led many astray. I know in this debate the truth will come out. Here is a clip of Hitchens on Bill Maher's cable show. This is shows why that as long as long as Dr Craig obeys God and holds to the truths in the Bible, he cannot loose this debate.

Hard Drives have feeling too?

Everyone has to come clean. You've done it. I've done it. Everyone who has ever had to use a computer knows what its like waiting for a computer to pull up information. Hearing the whirl of the hard drive being read...feeling the impatience. Thinking that: "I thought computers were supposed to be faster than this." And let's be honest...that last thought I wrote about is often heard being yelled at the computer. Let's face it: It's therapeutic emotionally. However, there may be more consequences. I read a post on G4TV's blog:

Thanks to Brendan Gregg of Sun's Fishworks team, we know for a FACT yelling at your computer doesn't do anything helpful, and in fact increases latency.

Brendan wanted to see the effects of vibration on a disc array, so the best idea he came up with for improvised vibration was yelling at it. I'm glad I'm not kidding. What resulted (besides an incredibly hilarious video) was a sharp spike the number of I/O operations that take over 5ms to complete. Lesson learned: electronics won't listen to you.

In other words, sound vibration has the effect of increasing the time it takes to perform reading and writing operations on a hard disk in a hard drive. So yelling at your computer only makes it take longer in doing what you want. To be honest yelling at any human beings make him or her less likely to listen, but to some varying level refuse to cooperate. Machines are more like us than I thought. Here is a video of Mr. Gregg performing his tests.



I'd personally, like to see the tests done in a quiet room. I'd like to know what effect the sounds from the air conditioners made to Gregg's tests.

"Watchmen" Mini-Primer

The up-coming movie Watchmen is based on a graphic novel by genius writer Alan Moore in 1985. And when it was published, it changed everything about the way superheroes are thought of and depicted. That's as much as I knew about it...up to now. You see it was also very mature (ie not for kids) and I was a kid in 1985 so no one would sell it to me then, let alone would my parents have let me read it. And now well into adulthood, I just haven't read it yet. But I will. In the meantime, a neat feauturette has hit myspace showing clips from the movie (most of which I've seen already) but interspersed with an interview with the director, Zach Snyder, who gives background on the story, and the characters. He even tells us the names of each actor.

Watchmen Exclusive

See? The PS3 Is Not Just A Toy

I came across an article that shows that Sony's PS3 is not just a toy for amusement it can actually be used for good things and bad things. Some hackers proved that connecting 200 PS3s into a network, called a "cluster", and using them to work on the same problem: cracking SSL (secure sockets layer) certificates and generating "a rogue Certification Authority (CA), a breakthrough that allows the forging of certificates that are fully trusted by all modern Web browsers." The idea is called "distributing computing". This means that each computer in the network works on a pieces of a problem. It's like solving a complex equation with more than one person on it at the same time. A single PS3 by itself is powerful. One PS3 console is capable of running billions of calculations in a second. That is why it so great at doing video games. If one console can do that imagine what 200 can do. You ineffect have a super computer that outpaces the CRAY computers of 1980s. Like any technology, it is not good or bad. It depends on how you use it. I have found lots of atricles about how to do it. For example, PS3 clusters are used in scientific research like cruching data for NASA over the Internet. I think I will do that when I get my PS3 (of course when I'm not playing with it).

IPod Touch Tablet?

G4TV have reported on its blog that there is a rumor of tablet version of the Ipod touch. It will have all the features of the smaller hand held version but maybe by Fall of 2009 we can have a unit with 8-9 inch screen. This news makes me the think that I should wait for that version instead of jumping to get a new Iphone, Ipod, or Ipod Touch. I prefer watching movies on the largest screen possible and 8-9 inches will ensure that it is portable. The article refers to it as a netbook because as I discussed earlier, a netbook uses the internet for a lot of it's processing. This means than this Ipod Tablet would not need a lot of hardware to carry out the functions it is designed for: interacting with multimedia applications and web browsing. In a sentence: I WANT ONE!!!!

There are no words....

Just when you think you've heard of every kind of crime imaginable, some idiot in Oregon invaded an elderly woman's home. Unfortunately, that in and of itself is not unheard of. However this man was naked. Why? The article does not say. The man forced the woman into her living room and pushed her face down into a chair. The 88 year-old woman had the presence of mind to reach around squeezed his crotch. The man thankfully ran away. He must have thought that she was easy pickings, but he was wrong! The man was later arrested. What goes through people's minds?

Ill. Gov. Blagojevich Sure knows How to Bob and Weave

Illinois Governor Blagovich stands accused of trying to sell Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat to highest bidder. So what does he do? Does he resign? No. He appoints a man than no one in their right mind would fight his appointment, Roland Burris. If he isn't confirmed there will be no other African-American in the Senate. Also he was the first black popularly elected official in the state. Also he was an Attorny General (can we say qualified?). He was one of Blagovich's rivals. He lost one of his bids to become governor to Blagovich. This is a mark in Burris' favor because considering the corruption of that state, Burris must be less corrupt because he lost. To top it off, Burris had been a Black Panther when he was younger! Can you think of a more unassailable candidate? Looks like Blagovich has some serious gall to think that that he can appoint a senator after the mess he's in. Yet he seems to have tried to deflect some of the scrutiny by making a responsible choice and a politically savy choice. No one is gonna wanna block the only Black person from being in the Senate. I read a great article about it on Black Snob's Blog.

Mystique and Me

Here is a webisode that I thought was really funny. It stars Jerry O'Connell and Rebecca Romijn (who played Mystique in the X-men films). You've got to see this:

"Mystique is Pregnant" featuring Jerry O'Connell and Rebecca Romijn by Jerry Minor