YouTube - Adam and Eve

Here is a neat animated clip of the story of Adam and Eve from the beginning of the Bible.

YouTube - Adam and Eve

Are Black People Cursed?

I found a tweet from an atheist containing a link to with the title "Are Black People Cursed?". I immediately thought that I wouldn't like this because the tweeter is an atheist and I wasn't sure what the intent of the tweet was. I am glad I read the post. It's a Slide presentation showing how no way can you get slavery, racism, or that black folk are cursed by God out of the Bible. I agreed with almost everything in the presentation and I recommend that everyone read it and give the information and view point presented some thought.

Are Black People Cursed?

View more presentations from Pastor Irby Johnson.

Are Black People Cursed?

YouTube - Jesus animation - John 14

There is a member of YouTube how has been using 3D animation software (Poser and CrazyTalk) to make life-like movies of people reading Bible verses. Here is Jesus speaking John 14. I love this. It is extremely well done!




Here is the actual text  of John 14 (NIV)

YouTube - Jesus animation - John 14

Can This Condom Keep You From Being Raped? « TheGloss

What does it say about men that women have to go to the extreme of  wearing a female condom that cuts into a man when he forces himself on her?  It's a shame!  I hate it.  I mean "No" should be good enough. a woamn has the right to be able to say "No" and that should be respected. 

Can This Condom Keep You From Being Raped? « TheGloss

Richard Dawkins vs. The Pope | True Freethinker

Mariano has posted a link to an article about Richard Dawkins calling for an investigation in order to determine how much the Pope knew about the flood of sexual misconduct of Roman catholic priests. I haven't got a problem with that. but I've got to wonder why Richard Dawkins is outraged. I mean is it on;y wrong when clergy do it? Mariano said:

Now, is the outrage and call for arrest really coming from the very same Richard Dawkins who argues that some are merely “gentle pedophiles” and that too much is made of some cases of pedophilia??

I agree with Mariano. I hate double standards. Raping children is wrong no matter who does it and under all circumstances.

Richard Dawkins vs. The Pope | True Freethinker

New Season, New Blood, New Warriors

Okay, I have found out when the next season of Deadliest Warrior starts - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 and I can't wait. I know the show has got some flack for not being historical or scientific "enough" but I like it. The history presented agrees with other sources I have learned and to me the most questionable science is how the computer program that is used to simulate the fights seems a little vague and hand wavy but I still can't wait to see the next shows.
Warrior match-ups for Season 2!


SWAT vs. GSG-9

Attila the Hun vs. Alexander the Great

Aztec Jaguar vs. Zande Warrior

Jesse James Gang vs. Al Capone Gang
Persian Immortal vs. Celt

Roman Centurion vs. India's Rajput Warrior

Somali Pirate vs. Medellin Cartel

Nazi SS vs. Viet Cong

KGB vs. CIA

Vlad the Impaler vs. Sun Tzu

Ming Warrior vs. Musketeer

Comanche vs. Mongol

Navy Seal vs. Israeli Commando


New Season, New Blood, New Warriors

YouTube - The Authenticity of the Bible - Debate

This was really interesting. This was an three-on-three discussion. Dr. Jamal Badawi, Mr. Hamza Abdul Malik, Dr. Hussein Morsi argued against the authenticity of the Bible. Dr. Gleason Archer, Dr. Robert Douglas, Mr. Keith Smith argued for the authenticity of the Bible. I think that the debate was weighted towards the Muslims but the Christians on the panel did a great job responding in most respects. I really liked this debate because when most Christian opponents bring up "problems" in the Bible, these things are almost never addressed. In this debate there were some responses. I would have liked to have seen more interaction between the two sides. One thing that came up for me is why the Muslim's on the panel's double standard? I mean why is it okay to accuse Christians of monkeying around with the Bible and putting words in Jesus' mouth that He never said yet deny the possibility of the same thing with Muhammad and the Qur'an? I will go as far as saying that Muslims can make the same claim about the Qur'an as I do as the Bible: That we know exactly what the Bible and the Qur'an was meant to say. That being given, which one is the Word of God. They conflict. They both can't be completely true. You have to either accept one or deny both as the Word of God. As for me, I believe the Bible is the Word of God because it corresponds with reality better. I say this because the Bible and History say that Jesus was crucified and died but the Qur'an says He wasn't. What?  That does not add up.




YouTube - The Authenticity of the Bible

Confident Christianity: The Merits of Debate

Christian Apologist Mary Jo Sharp, who has a couple of good successful debates behind her, has written a great post about what debate is and it's place in apologetics and ministry. It's a good article. I agree with her.

Confident Christianity: The Merits of Debate

YouTube - Jesus Walks on Water - Anime Jesus

Here is an interesting video I found on YouTube. An animation of Jesus walking on water using a Japanese animated (Anime) style. So why did Jesus walk on water? Was He showing off? Was He just trying to get to the boat?  Jesus was validating his deity. Job 9:8 says:

He [God] alone stretches out the heavens
       and treads on the waves of the sea.

You can read the accounts of Jesus walking on water at the following links:

Matthew 14:22-36
Mark 6:45-56
John 6:16-24



YouTube - Jesus Walks on Water - Anime Jesus

Dr. Robert Price's Reason for Accepting the CRI Debate Challenge

As you may already know that Dr. James White is debating Dr. Robert M. Price very soon. This debate will be important because Price is one of the rare scholars who completely deny that all of scripture and just about all claims of Christianity, period. He must be answered because he's not a stupid, uneducated, ignorant, nor inarticulate by human standards. He's not even mean. He doesn't seem demonic at all. People like him seem to be reasonable and willing to discuss the issue. Thankfully in one of his most recent blog posts Dr White quotes Price about why he has accepted this debate and how he thinks of debates in general. I think that it is important that you read this post so you can see stupid a mind can become without God.

Most importantly, Dr. White has given his own reasons for doing this debate and all the debates he engages in:

I listen to the Crossans and Ehrmans and Prices of the world not because I enjoy the exercise (I would much rather be listening to something uplifting and edifying), but because I seek to honor the truth, and the only way to do that is to do the work necessary to accurately represent your opponent in debate, for the benefit of the widest possible audience. So while Dr. Price will be seeking to "reach" only a small sliver of the audience in an attempt to push them over into agnosticism, I will be seeking to reach a much wider group: I wish to reach the unbelievers by demonstrating that the faith can stand in the presence of radical unbelief without compromise; I wish to reach the believers by modeling how they may provide an answer to those attacking their faith. And of course, another major difference between us is that Dr. Price has only the weapon of his own doubt to use. I have the Spirit of God, who raised Jesus from the dead, to make the truth to come alive in the hearts of His people.

I agree with Dr. White. Debates don't change everyone but it does help some people and it's a tool God uses.If only only one person is ultimately saved through a debate it is worth it,.



Dr. Robert Price's Reason for Accepting the CRI Debate Challenge

Apologetics 315: Terminology Tuesday: Exegesis, Eisegesis

Here is a great post from Apologetics 315! It defines "exegesis" and "eisegesis". This is exactly the definition I use asnd I wish people wouldf do exegesis and not eisegesis.


Apologetics 315: Terminology Tuesday: Exegesis, Eisegesis

Apologetics 315: Historical Reliability of Jesus' Resurrection MP3 Audio by Jürgen Spieß

Brian Auten has been a blessing once again. He has posted a lecture of a German historian arguing for the resurrection. I am grateful for this because a lot of times people like Bart Ehrman try to say that professional historians deny Jesus' Resurrection I usually point to Paul Maier as a credible historian but Brian has helped me by being able to point out another. I fid it interesting that his arguments are similar to William Lane Craig's and Gary Habermas' presentations. Here is Brian's descriptions.

Jürgen Spieß (PhD in Ancient History) presents this lecture on the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus. This talk (given at the European Leadership Forum, and hosted by bethinking.org) covers the importance of the resurrection, historical research, historical sources, and the evidences for the resurrection

Apologetics 315: Historical Reliability of Jesus' Resurrection MP3 Audio by Jürgen Spieß

In Defense of the Faith Apologetic Ministry » Blog Archive » Evans vs. Ehrman: Does the New Testament Misquote Jesus?

A few days ago I posted this debate but now here is the video.




In Defense of the Faith Apologetic Ministry » Blog Archive » Evans vs. Ehrman: Does the New Testament Misquote Jesus?

Positive Atheism's Big List of Richard Dawkins Quotations part 1

Richard Dawkins via last.fm

This is first in a series of blog posts where I would like to take a quotation of  Richard Dawkins and examine it. What I hope to do is stir discussion. If anyone think i'm being unfair or taking something out of context, they can correct me in the comments. The quotes will come from the following link and in no particular order:

Positive Atheism's Big List of Richard Dawkins Quotations

What has happened is that genetics has become a branch of information technology. It is pure information. It's digital information. It's precisely the kind of information that can be translated digit for digit, byte for byte, into any other kind of information and then translated back again. This is a major revolution. I suppose it's probably "the" major revolution in the whole history of our understanding of ourselves. It's something would have boggled the mind of Darwin, and Darwin would have loved it, I'm absolutely sure.
-- Richard Dawkins, Life: A Gene-Centric View Craig Venter & Richard Dawkins: A Conversation in Munich (Moderator: John Brockman) "This event was a continuation of the Edge 'Life: What a Concept!' meeting in August, 2008." [sic]

I like this. I think Dawkins does understand how truly revolutionary genetics truly is. What amazes me is how much like our digital technology is but on a much more complex level. My question is...where does it come from?  Dawkins believe that it was natural process of evolution...blind and unguided. How? It's like saying Windows 7 evolved from Windows 3.11 tom Windows 95 to Windows 98 to Windows 2000 to Windows XP (Millennium and Vista being dead ends). Does that make sense? Or how about the evolution form 8 bit Nintendo to the Wii? Code does not write itself.

Get inside this "Iron Man 2" trailer like never before! | Marvel.com News | Marvel.com

Okay, I'm trying to not completely geek out here! This is a web Widget to promote Iron Man 2. It is for an international audience that is why the release date is not May 7, 2010. Why is the international release date sooner than for us here in America? I have no idea, but excuse me while I play with this thing.




Get inside this "Iron Man 2" trailer like never before! | Marvel.com News | Marvel.com

Related articles by Zemanta

• Iron Man 2 interactive trailer blows me away (scyfilove.com)
• "Iron Man 2″ Poised to Best "The Dark Knight"? (kylesmithonline.com)
• 'Iron Man 2' Releases A Third Movie Trailer (pinkisthenewblog.com)
• 'Iron Man 2' Releases EVEN More Promo Photos (pinkisthenewblog.com)

He Lives: Honest Science

I love David Heddle's blog. It's cool. He considers a scientific article from Scientific American entitled Scientists say free will probably doesn't exist, but urge: "Don't stop believing!" This post is pointed and funny. I can't tell if David Heddle, himself believes in free will but considering his reformed views and his appropriate lampoon of the article I'd think that he denies that all of us have free will. His observation was so interesting, I have to quote a portion of it.

He Lives: Honest Science: "Silly scientists.
(a) Telling us to believe in something that they cannot demonstrate or explain and
(b) actually do not think is even real.

That's worse than theists! At most we are guilty of (a), but not (b).

Of all the things with which you could fill in the blank: Without God there is no [blank], one of the hardest things for atheists to address is free will.

Morality? Altruism? Evolved, evolved, next question?

Free will?

"*crickets chirping*"


There is no scientific explanation possible for free will. True free will, if it exists, is inherently supernatural. By its very definition it involves circumventing nature. The universe's differential equation is leading you to perform action A, but you rise up against nature's next time-step and choose B instead.

Hey nature, you didn't see that one coming didja?, you dumb old broad!"

Okay...I think I'm done laughing now.

Quran Explorer

I've always enjoyed the fact that I can look up any book, chapter, and verse in Bible using the Internet. Turns out you can do the same with the Qur'an. The following site is very useful dealing with the Qur'an and in discussion with Muslims.



Quran Explorer

Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: Mortimer Adler on the God Question

I agree. I think everyone needs to read this quote! Thanks to Brain Auten of Apologetics 315.

“More consequences for thought and action follow the affirmation or denial of God than from answering any other basic question.”

- Mortimer Adler

Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: Mortimer Adler on the God Question

The Dunamis Word: The Myth Of Magnet Morality

I have been following District Superintendent  Harvey Burnett's comments on John Loftus' blog as he defends the Bible from people who obviously have no idea what they are talking about. I agree with Elder Burnett. i enjoy his comments and think he is a very able debater,. i also happen to be in the same church denomination but i live in California. He has recently posted a great article on his own blog post explaining how people who claim evolution can explain the source of moral values can't possibly be correct. It's a good read!

The Dunamis Word: The Myth Of Magnet Morality

Apologetics 315: Essay: Cumulative Reasons for Christianity by Chad Gross

Here is the essay from Apologetics 315 in the current series. This one is Chad Gross who runs the Truthbomb Apologetics blog. I love his blog and this essay shows why his blog and ministry are so awesome!

Apologetics 315: Essay: Cumulative Reasons for Christianity by Chad Gross