Friday, February 25, 2011

God's Knowledge/Man's Knowledge

Jeff Downs has posted an audio of a discussion of the controversy between God's Foreknowledge and Man's Knowledge


Some of you are familiar with what has become known (inappropriately) as the Van Til/Clark controversy; dealing with what constitutes God's knowledge and man's knowledge. Recently the crew from the Reformed Forum spent some time with Dr. Scott Oliphint (who sat under Van Til and now teaches Apologetics at WTS) and addressed this controversy. Click here to listen.

If you are not familiar with Dr. Oliphint, he is the author of The Battle Belongs to the Lord and Reasons for Faith: Philosophy in the Service of Theology, both books dealing with apologetics. He is also one of the editors of Christian Apologetics Past and Present: A Primary Source Reader. Dr. Oliphint is certainly one of my favorites when it comes to contemporary apologetic thought.

God's Knowledge/Man's Knowledge
Enhanced by Zemanta

FacePalm of the Day #66 - Debunking Christianity: Christians demand that I must show their faith is impossible before they will see that it is improbable.

John Loftus wrote  a fairly lengthy post but I will not be responding to the entire post. Instead I will cover the worse part of it.

Science has closed the gaps in our knowledge of the workings of the world. With each gap that is closed believers move the goal posts, claiming that their God is still active in the world. In effect, until science can close every single gap they will have reason to believe. That is, either science must show it's impossible for God to exist or they can believe despite the massive onslaught of science. Because of this science some of the more reasonable believers will say God is not to be found in the gaps, but instead he is the sustained of the world. Yet look at what they've done. Either they argue from the gaps of they don't. If they do, then they must continually move the goal posts, which means they were wrong in the past. Thus arguing from the gaps is an argument from ignorance. If they don't do this, then this universe looks indistinguishable from a universe without God in it at all.

To be honest I don't think Loftus realizes that the more questions Science answers the more questions get asked. There is not a single thing that we can completely exhaustively claim to have fully explained.

Unless we can prove we do not live in a Matrix, or are not dreaming right now, or are not some brains in a vat, then believers will opine we all have faith. And if they can get us to admit this then they drive a whole truckload of Christian assumptions through that small crevice. Can we prove any of these things are not the case? Then they have every bit of a right to believe the wildly improbable things they do about a triune god, an incarnation, transfiguration, resurrection, ascension, and final judgment. This is a huge non-sequitur. There is no parity here at all, even if we grant these things, which I've written on before.

The bottom line is, we assume a whole lot - things we can't prove. For example, how do we know the light has the same speed all over the universe in all inertial reference frames? We don't really know that but its seems probably true. Loftus' whole argument seems to hinge on him thinking that "a triune god, an incarnation, transfiguration, resurrection, ascension, and final judgment" are all improbable. However he has not proven that they are improbable.  No one can. If something is designed and put into place -  probability is a stupid thing to consider because probability has nothing to do with it. If Jesus' Resurrection was an predetermined and deliberate act than there is no possibility that it would not happen. Science is full of finding out that the improbable is not only just possible but necessarily true.

There are other things to say but I'll stop for now. Others can chime in with more examples. But just think if a banker told someone that he would probably bring financial ruin upon himself if he invested all his money in one particular stock. What would you think if this guy invested his money anyway because his banker could not prove he would bring financial ruin on himself? Think on this and you see exactly what believers continually do.

I think the investment analogy is flawed. The Christian message is not that if you accept Christ you will bring ruin on yourself. A better analogy is of a person being bankrupt and hopelessly in debt and deserving to spend the rest of their lives in jail given the amount they owe and can never pay back. Then that person gets the news that all they have to do is believe and trust the one they owe and they can get the debt washed away and lavished with untold wealth - more than they can imagine. That is the Gospel. The biggest facepalm of all is that Loftus does not understand what he rejects.


Debunking Christianity: Christians demand that I must show their faith is impossible before they will see that it is improbable.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 24, 2011

The Dunamis Word: The Most Dangerous Place

Elder Harvey Burnett has written a very interesting blog posting pointing out a backlash of criticism of the picture on the left. Given the following paragraph:

In response to a high abortion rate in New York city which touts over the 17,000 black babies murdered at the hands of abortion providers in 2010. That's almost 50 abortions per day by black women in New York City alone. Then there's the statistic that although Blacks only comprise 13% of the US population, they are over 36% of abortions annually. Pointing out that dismal statistic is an antiabortionist group called Thatsabortion.com. Building on solid statistical data they have undertaken to place another add bringing attention to what can only be considered to be a genocide occurring within the black community.


I find it amazing that pro-Abortion organizations and Planned Parenthood would be crying foul. They don't deny the fact that in America Black people make up a small part of the population but make up more the 1/3 of abortions. I highly recommend, Elder Burnett's post because he traces the fact the genocide against Black people and poor people has always been the aim of the Planned Parenthood. No, y'all, getting rid of Hitler did not get rid of Eugenics. Am I offended by the poster? Nope. But I am offended by people pretending they ain't trying to kill us while pretending to do us a favor - advocating disobeying God all for the sake of convenience. No one can tell me that even 90% of those abortions was because of rape.

The Dunamis Word: The Most Dangerous Place
Enhanced by Zemanta

Fistbump Quote of the Day - Confident Christianity: Distorted View Of Reality?

Mary Jo Sharp posted the following statement:

My last post on the Christian university and worldview had a similar line of thinking. Are we, as Christians, learning doctrines as somewhat intangible, lofty ideals or are we taking into consideration what each doctrine entails for our individual lives and our lives within the human community? Are we working through how these doctrines effect our daily lives? Let me state it one more way: If Christianity is true, what effect does its truthfulness have on our lives? I believe that if Christianity is true then a lack of understanding of the doctrines and themes of the Christian faith would leave us with a distorted view of reality. What do you think?

I agree withe her 100%! Amen and Amen!!!!

Confident Christianity: Distorted View Of Reality?
Enhanced by Zemanta

In Memory of Dwayne McDuffie: A Look Back at the Man Comics Needed - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews

CoolB and Dwayne McDuffieImage by CoolB047 via Flickr
At Comics Alliance, David Brothers has written a great article on the work of Dwayne McDuffie. I'm going to miss McDuffie's genius. I have always enjoyed his work and it's always great to see someone who share a similar cultural background to mine being successful in industries that people of color don't usually have opportunities to thrive in. I echo, Brothers' words where he wrote about Dwayne McDuffie:


The man was a visionary, and I'm extraordinarily thankful for the work he gave us before he died.

One of the things that Brothers describes is McDuffie's ability to really craft character-driven stories that were just plain fun and action packed. He included a page from a Fantastic Four issue he wrote. It's very poignantly illustrates how well he understood the characters he wrote. It was true regardless of if it were Batman, Superman, Thor, Captain America, Static, Black Panther, Storm, or Ben 10!


In Memory of Dwayne McDuffie: A Look Back at the Man Comics Needed - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews
Enhanced by Zemanta

John Lennox & Peter Atkins in Dialogue Video/Audio - Apologetics 315

Brian Auten has posted a debate between John Lennox and Peter Atkins on science and the existence of God. You can get to the audio at the following link and I have embedded the video below. They discuss just what science can and cannot tell us about God.


Duelling Professors from Grenville Kent on Vimeo.


John Lennox & Peter Atkins in Dialogue Video/Audio - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Debunking Christianity: New Zealand Quake Kills 65 And Traps Hundreds! Isn't God Good?

This is exactly one of those arguments that shouldn't make sense to the person making it but it seems that John Loftus actually thinks that either no Christian has ever given a good answer to this objection or that this argument is actually a huge problem.

I consider the evidential case against a good God from naturally caused suffering to be the most significant problem for believers.

Can anyone tell me why God did not do a perpetual miracle by averting that earthquake? If God was concerned about remaining hidden then no one would suspect he did anything if he averted it, because it would not have taken place. Anyone? Anyone?





No one can say why God did not miraculously stop the earthquake. I live on and near several fault lines in California. I can't explain why God allowed a huge earthquake in New Zealand but thus far today has spared me, my family, friends, and neighbors the same fate or worse. Jesus dealt with this question. And he dealt with it by pointing out that in asking the question we are looking in the wrong spot and asking the wrong question.


1 Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. 2 Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? 3 I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. 4 Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? 5 I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.” - Luke 13:1-5


His disciples were wondering why did God allow Pilate to abuse Jewish people in such a horrible way. Jesus takes their question and gets them to think in a way that we don't typically think. We usually wonder, what did a person do to deserve such horror when they suffer. Jesus points out that just because you are spared it doesn't make you better or more righteous than the ones who suffer. This isn't just regarding evil we perpetrate on each other but natural disasters and accidents - like the earthquake in New Zealand and the fall of the tower of Siloam.

So why do bad things happen to people who don't seem to deserve it? Wrong question. Why do good things happen to us? Answer: God's mercy. As for how to deal with the problems of life, I have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit and the promises of God on which to stand.


28 And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. 29 For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters. - Romans 8:28-29


What have you got when the rubber meets the road and your life seems to fall apart and things happen that you could not have possibly foreseen. Without Jesus, what is the point? None.

Is God good? All the time!!!! Even in the midst of a deadly Earthquake. It could have been far worse. God continued to provide mercy for the people living there. Best take Jesus' words to heart and repent because our time of suffering is coming if not here already. 

Debunking Christianity: New Zealand Quake Kills 65 And Traps Hundreds! Isn't God Good?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Reginald Hudlin on the Black Panther

Here are a couple of Reginald Hudlin discussing being a black writer in the Entertainment Industries







Enhanced by Zemanta

Dwayne McDuffie on the realities of the Black writer in the comic book i...

Here is a video of Dwayne McDuffie on the realities of being a comic book/Hollywood writer who happens to be black.



Enhanced by Zemanta

FistBump of the Day to "Thinking God's Thoughts"

I really enjoy reading Brennon's blog and his Facebook quote. I really wanted to call attention to a couple of things he posted today.

On the origin of morality
Many atheists, when trying to ground moral values, appeal to something like human well being as a guide for morality. This seems to be patently insufficient of a ground for morals, because it itself is simply a moral judgment. It is good to promote human well being and bad to stifle it is a moral value itself, and therefore can't be the ground of moral values. As I said to one commenter on Sam Harris' attempt to use this as a ground, "Saying that well-being of some sort is good is simply another moral claim, so it hasn't reached any sort of ontological base at all. If this is Harris' base, then he seems to have stopped short of a true ground for morality and settled for a branch. [In other words] you can't say that a moral value is itself the ground of moral value."

This is why most attempts at ethics today are silly little exercises in futility.
On Science and Teleology
So I'm picking on my ethics teacher again, which may turn into quite a habit for the next 12 weeks or so. This statement (the title of this post) was one of the supposed problems with Thomas Aquinas' natural law theory. My teacher really didn't argue for this assertion. How has Science done this?

Is it because it can now explain how things work? What does that have to do with whether they have an end they were designed for?

It seems to me that this is just an assumption that flows from, at least, methodological naturalism. But even if you accept that science can't access the reason for which something was created, but can only tell us how it was created/works, it certainly doesn't follow that it wasn't created for some reason.

Not to mention that this seems to be patently untrue anyway. Certain fields of science seem to make their living on detecting teleology. Archaeologists do this often.
I admit that I don't agree with everything he writes but I really like these posts. Thanks, Brennon! All I can say is "Amen and amen."

Thinking God's Thoughts: Settling for a Branch
Thinking God's Thoughts: Modern Science Rejects Teleology
Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama Critics, Out of Ideas, Call First Lady "Fat" - The Snob Blog - Danielle Belton's The Black Snob

When you can't demolish an opponent for his/her ideas or actions what do you do? You go after his/her spouse. What if you can't deal any dirt about the spouse what do you? Make fun of them. Danielle Belton has posted an article about how people have been calling Michelle Obama fat, although she isn't fat and it seems because they can't find anything mean or nasty to say without tipping off how racist they are. I liked how Ms Belton phrased the end of her post

It doesn't matter what she does. It'll be wrong because she'll still be doing it while black, the most wrongest thing in the history of America. After all, as the quote my mother likes to repeat says, "We were brought here to work and entertain." Every day upon which Michelle Obama adorns herself in finery and does whatever the hell she wants is a giant "screw you" to the slavery industrial complex. She was supposed to be poppin' out babies and pickin' cotton. Not having State Dinners and wearing couture and trying to help our fat-ass kids shed some pounds. The nerve!
BACK OF THE BUS, First Lady! BACK OF THE BUS!

I agree with her. The sad thing is that many of the Obama's detractors don't even understand what they are doing.

Obama Critics, Out of Ideas, Call First Lady "Fat" - The Snob Blog - Danielle Belton's The Black Snob
Enhanced by Zemanta

My Common Sense is Tingling - Debunking Christianity: The Top Ten Misconceptions About Atheists

John Loftus posted a list of 10 things that are misconceptions of atheists. I think he's right that many people think this way about atheists and most of these ideas are wrong. His comments are in bold.

Let me correct some of the most egregious misconceptions believers have about us, in reverse order:

10) We don’t eat or molest babies. Nor do we agree with what allegedly atheist dictators did in the past century. Over-all we are good people. All you need to do is personally know one of us to see this. I have no doubt but that you probably already know an atheist. It’s just that you don’t give that person the freedom to tell you in this Christian dominated culture. I wish more atheists would “come out of the closet” because of this.

It's really unfortunate that people think this way. An atheist is no more evil than any other believers.

9) We do not worship the devil. We do not think he exists.

With one hand Loftus gives, and takes away with the other.

8) We do not fear threats of hell. So why make them? Christians don’t fear any threats of hell coming from Muslims. So why threaten us? The fact that you do shows us you’d rather see us burn in hell. That’s some Christian compassion in action!

Who says that Christians want to see anyone burn in hell? I don't. I can't send you or anyone to hell - that is a given. Only Jesus can save you from hell.. Nor do any Christians I know. How can you be threatened by something that you believe is not true?

7) We don’t claim to know more than God. We don’t think he exists. We do think that if God existed he could have done a much better job with this world though.

So the fact that I thought that some atheists like John Loftus are arrogant are true.

6) We don’t claim to be better than God. We don’t think he exists. We do think that if God existed he doesn’t appear to be good.

Again more hubris.

5) We don’t hate God nor are we angry with he/she/it. Again, we don’t think he exists. We can be angry with what believers do in the name of God though.

So the thought of hell shouldn't bother you either. The thing is what you believe doesn't make it true.

4) We do not agree with each other about a host of other ideas. But we all agree that a god probably doesn’t exist.

Right! I'm sure that not all atheist are as close-minded as others.

3) We don’t claim to know with certainty that a god of some kind doesn’t exist. Not even Richard Dawkins or Victor Stenger thinks it’s impossible that a god of some kind exists (I heard them both say as much in debates). We do think the God hypothesis is unnecessary and irrelevant to life though.

I know that not all atheists see things this way. If God is unnecessary and irrelevant then why does it matter if He does or does not exist? The very question makes God relevant and necessary. Is a father unnecessary and irrelevant for the help of his children? If you can say "Yes" then the society has slipped closer to hell than I thought.

2) We don’t have faith nor a religion. We base our conclusions on the available evidence. We do not take a leap of faith beyond those probabilities. And since to have a religion one must believe in supernatural beings and forces, we cannot be labeled as religious in any meaningful sense.

Interesting definition of "faith" and "religion". Not Biblical. Religion does not mean you must believe in supernatural forces and beings. Religion is something you believe and informs your behavior and the way you look at the world. If someone can tell me that their atheism has nothing to do with what they think and how they look at the world, they are truly deluded.

1) We are not a minority. In one sense, depending on how you categorize people, we are all minorities in some group or another. But we are the second largest denomination in America. Depending on how we define an atheist (if we include agnostics who are skeptics with regard to all "revealed" religions) we may even be upwards to 24% of the population. So says this poll. Worldwide we represent third place among the world religions, even though we're not religious.

Minority? Sounds like a lemming mentality. The desire to not be alone and stand for what you think. Atheism has historically mean belief in no God. Trying to massage it so you can include other people in your numbers is really sad. It is exactly what religious people do who desire to fill their church rolls and don't really care if the people are born-again or not.

Debunking Christianity: The Top Ten Misconceptions About Atheists
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Watson Kills All Humans - Sessler's Soapbox - G4tv.com

Adam Sessler at TGS 07Image via WikipediaAdam Sessler has offers his comments regarding the recent win of Watson on Jeopardy and what artificial intelligence means for the human race. Makes me laugh!





Watson Kills All Humans - Sessler's Soapbox - G4tv.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Dwayne McDuffie - R.I.P

R.I.P., Dwayne McDuffieI'm amazed about how news comes out. I left work and found out that Dwayne McDuffie died of complications from surgery.This was sudden. The man was a genius and so very talented. He understood the characters he wrote and he also was responsible for some of the greatest fictional characters ever in print, television, and movies. McDuffie co-created Static. He was heavily responsible for the Justice League show and on top of that Ben 10 and Generator Rex. Not to mention the several DC animated movies and the whole Milestone line of comics. I was always amazed how well he could write the new characters he created and the mainstays like Wolverine, Batman, and Superman. Ironically, his latest project, All-Star Superman animated movie dropped today. I'm going to miss him very much. I remember one piece of work of his I really liked back in the day was the Marvel comic Damage Control.

I want to join blogger Cheryl Lynn who writes:

You need to do right by this man, DC.

McDuffie omnibus. Very soon. And when you include Milestone Forever, you use his original, unaltered scripts--with the quotes he selected included.

Cheryl Lynn @ 06:13 PM EST Link

There have been some great things written in his honor today. Check them out.

R.I.P., Dwayne McDuffie
Dwayne McDuffie, R.I.P. [UPDATED]
Digital Femm
Why I’ll miss Dwayne McDuffie





Enhanced by Zemanta

Today on a Radio Free Geneva: Questions About Calvinism

James White talked about six common questions on Calvinism. Follow the link to hear the program

Today on a Radio Free Geneva: Questions About Calvinism
Enhanced by Zemanta

Turretin and Compatibilism: Man's Freedom and God's Decree

Jamin Hubner posted the following quote from Turretin.

Although men’s actions may be free (because done spontaneously and by a previous judgment of reason), they do not cease to be necessary with respect to the divine decree and foreknowledge. Now the foreknowledge of God implies indeed the infallibility of futurition and of the event and the necessity of consequence, and yet does not imply coaction or violence, nor take away from the will its intrinsic liberty. - Institutes, third topic, question 12 (p. 211, english trans.)
I like it! Read Hubner's comments at the following link.

Turretin and Compatibilism: Man's Freedom and God's Decree
Enhanced by Zemanta

“The Fatima Crusader” and False Prophecy | True Freethinker

Mariano wrote a great article regarding really looking at the vision of the Virgin Mary at Fatima.

There appears to be a deceiving spirit, a fallen angel disguised as an angel of light, who is passing itself off as Jesus’ mother, Mary. This creature has been spreading false doctrine wrapped in a veneer of Christian obeisance as well as false prophecies.
It was a study into some of these false prophecies that lead me to write to Fr. Nicholas Gruner of The Fatima Crusader in order to pose some questions regarding these prophecies and those making them. The chronology of what follows is that Fr. Nicholas Gruner wrote an article in the year 1998 AD that made certain claims about prophecies that were to be fulfilled in 1999 AD and or 2000 AD. Once the year 2001 had come around, I wrote the following e-mail dated June 30th, 2001 AD (the usual pleasantries have been edited out)
Read the rest of the article at the following link.


“The Fatima Crusader” and False Prophecy | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: Congressman Allen West vs. CAIR: "Don't Try and Blow Sunshine Up My Butt"


David Wood posted a response to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Their argument is as follows.

The latest argument from the Council on American-Islamic Relations? "You can't show us a single verse where the Qur'an explicitly commands Muslims to attack America! Since the Qur'an nowhere commands Muslims to attack America, you can't say that Muslim attacks against America have anything to do with Islam!"

Of course David Wood isn't the only one who disagrees. He also posted Congressman Allen West response.




Go ahead and follow the link to see David Wood's well-reasoned Response.

Answering Muslims: Congressman Allen West vs. CAIR: "Don't Try and Blow Sunshine Up My Butt"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Iron Sharpens Iron: David Wood: Muslim Terrorizes Other Muslims: Dearborn Case Update

David Wood recently explained the most recent situation of the case in Dearborn, MI where he, Nabeel Quireshi  and a couple other people were arresting during an Islam festival without cause. Follow the link to listen to the interview.

Iron Sharpens Iron: David Wood: Muslim Terrorizes Other Muslims: Dearborn Case Update
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 21, 2011

Iron Sharpens Iron: Nabeel Qureshi: From the Crescent to the Cross: Testimony of a Muslim Convert to Christianity.

Many atheist that a person's religion is dependent on the one they were raised in. Nabeel Qureshi flies against that argument. Here is an interview he did recently on Iron Sharpens Iron! He explains why and how he left Islam for Christianity.

Iron Sharpens Iron: Nabeel Qureshi: From the Crescent to the Cross: Testimony of a Muslim Convert to Christianity.
Enhanced by Zemanta