Thursday, June 2, 2011

Complete Video of Brown/Smaw Debate on Same-Sex Marriage at UCF - Voice of Revolution





 This was a very good Debate, especially juxtaposed against a debate Dr Walter Martin did on television back in the early 1980's. Society has gotten worse. Ignoring Smaw's crudeness and ill-preparedness on one side, the issues and arguments have not changed. Back then people were more willing tom stand with what the Bible says. Today, as this debate shows, people want to live their own way and willing to throw out common sense to do it.  I posed the Martin debate from Mariano Grinbank in the following post, just follow the link.

Complete Video of Brown/Smaw Debate on Same-Sex Marriage at UCF - Voice of Revolution
Enhanced by Zemanta

Reformed Apologist: Women Worship Leaders - Just a Few Thoughts

This is a post that had my mind hanging open.
May women lead in worship?
The answer to the question should be obvious. Women may not lead worship because women may not lead God’s people. Let's be loving to our sisters in Christ and in humble obedience lead them out of such roles.

I read the whole argument and it didn't make sense. Let's see what the Bible says. There are instances in the Bible where women lead worship. Here is one:

Then Miriam the prophet, Aaron’s sister, took a timbrel in her hand, and all the women followed her, with timbrels and dancing. - Exodus 15:20

and

1 On that day Deborah and Barak son of Abinoam sang this song:
 2 “When the princes in Israel take the lead,
   when the people willingly offer themselves—
   praise the LORD!
 3 “Hear this, you kings! Listen, you rulers!
   I, even I, will sing to[a] the LORD;
   I will praise the LORD, the God of Israel, in song.- Judges 5:1-3

There is no reason to think that women cannot lead worship.

Reformed Apologist: Women Worship Leaders - Just a Few Thoughts
Enhanced by Zemanta

Debunking Christianity: Time Magazine Cover: Is Hell Dead?

I was wondering when would John Loftus would get around to commenting Rob Bell.

Christians have been reinventing their faith from the beginning. It won't stop. That's my prediction. So what will become orthodoxy in 20-30 years? This will. The orthodoxy of today started out as the unorthodoxy of yesterday.


I'm aware of the firestorm surrounding Bell's book Love Wins. Bell admits that his viewpoint is not new - in the slightest. If Loftus is correct then Rob Bell's ideas should be new without any precedent. However, it is far from new that people will throwout and misinterpret scriptures simply because it doesn't match their concept of God.

From the article Loftus linked to:

Particularly galling to conservative Christian critics is that Love Wins is not an attack from outside the walls of the Evangelical city but a mutiny from within — a rebellion led by a charismatic, popular and savvy pastor with a following. Is Bell's Christianity — less judgmental, more fluid, open to questioning the most ancient of assumptions — on an inexorable rise? "I have long wondered if there is a massive shift coming in what it means to be a Christian," Bell says. "Something new is in the air."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2065080,00.html#ixzz1KJGfxPfH

Yup, I smell it too: Heresy

God warned us about this.


1 In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who will judge the living and the dead, and in view of his appearing and his kingdom, I give you this charge: 2 Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction. 3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4 They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. 5 But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry. - 2 Timothy 4: 1-5


Debunking Christianity: Time Magazine Cover: Is Hell Dead?
Enhanced by Zemanta

FacePalm of the Day #82 -Debunking Christianity: A Challenge to Theists

John Loftus posted the following video from StampCollector who has issued a challenge to theists.





Before he gave the challenge, Stampcollector ranted and raved about the frustration of dealing with theists who ask atheists to prove that there is no god because the burden of proof is on the theist and not the atheist. I share his frustration because I agree that this trope has been pulled out time and time again and theism has shown how silly it is so I won't bring it up again. But it was telling that he slipped into that "one-less-god" crap. I think everyone who thinks that argument is persuasive argument should read Guest Post: One Less God

His challenge to theists is prove that one god made the universe. He thinks that even granting that the universe is created and fine-tuned it does not necessitate that a a personal god created it. He says he is not making a claim that there is no god or that there are multiple gods. He further does not want the Bible (or any Holy Book) used as proof or to point to faith as an answer.

The difference here is between evidential methods of Apologetics vs the revelational/presuppostitional  approach. Both work when discussing the existence of God. However I'm going to skip the revelational approach right now and ask "Is there enough evidence to point to the existence of a single omnipresent and omnipotent  being?" Is there enough evidence from which we can deduce what that being wants and expects from us.

Unlike StampCollector I do have a background in science and engineering so I'm going to be focusing on that sort of evidence. Consider these points that most people agree with so I can be equally clear..

1. The Universe - Times & Space; Matter & Energy - all came into existence.
2. Stamp Collector granted that the universe is fine-tuned to a precision that defies imagination making life on earth possible.
3. The assumption that there was an outside agents(s) responsible for all of this was already conceded for the sake of this argument. He is asking that someone show it had to be a single God.
4. I'm assuming that he is referring the supreme, personal being of the three monotheistic religions we call "God".
5. Genetic info - the information encoded in every living thing on earth must also be designed if the universe was designed.
6. The universe is decaying - the second law of thermodynamics. 

Omnipotence - being all powerful - has to be a characteristic of  who ever it was who brought the universe into being. The fine-tuned design of the universe and the genetic codes on which life is based would most likely be the product of one mind - one being who has to know everything to plan out such complexities - omniscience. Have you ever tried to design anything in collaboration. It can be interesting...sometimes fun...but it can also be a headache because you will always have disagreements that would be hashed out. We know that the universe is decaying - loosing energy as it's changed from one form to another - order dissolving into chaos.If this being is omnipotent why would this being - we call "God" - need anyone else to bring his creation into existence.

There are other qualities we can learn about the creator. The creator is intelligent, humor, desires diversity, loves color and beauty. It doesn't matter if God is truly like this or if we are programmed to see beauty and be awestruck by the works of his hands because in either case it would have been up to the one who made everything.

The next question is: "Has the creator spoken to us? Has the creator revealed himself to us?". As a Christian, I 'd  say "Yes" and that the Bible is the best candidate "Holy Book" for what that revelation really is and is not. The Bible over the Quran because while they agree that there is one supreme being that created the universe, the Bible tells us why it decays:

18 I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. 19 For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that[h] the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.
 22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. 23 Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies. 24 For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what they already have? 25 But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
 26 In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us through wordless groans. 27 And he who searches our hearts knows the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for God’s people in accordance with the will of God.
 28 And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who[i] have been called according to his purpose. 29 For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters. 30 And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.- Romans 8:18-30



Debunking Christianity: A Challenge to Theists
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Guest Post: One Less God | MandM

Bethyada has written a great posting answering a pet objection of many atheists. I hate this argument because it so bad

I have read a few posts on the ‘one less god’ proposition. Stephen F Roberts originally put it,
“I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”
elsewhere he says,
“We are all atheists, some of us just believe in fewer gods than others.”

There several ways to answer this stupid argument and the article does a great job explaining their strengths and weaknesses using logic.

Guest Post: One Less God | MandM
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Dr. Riddlebarger's Lecture, "B. B. Warfield on Arminians and Evangelicals"

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield (1851-1921)Image via WikipediaJames Swan posted this awesome lecture by Dr. Riddlebarger on the how B.B. Warfield thought of Armianism and the differences between being a Reformed Christian and an American Evangelical.

Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Dr. Riddlebarger's Lecture, "B. B. Warfield on Arminians and Evangelicals"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Jakes Blasts Franklin Graham for Obama Comments

Official presidential portrait of Barack Obama...                                      Image via WikipediaOne complaint some white conservative commentators decry that when they criticize Barack Obama they get labeled as racist, stupid rednecks. Of course that's because they say stupid, racist rednecked things about a Obama. For example, trying to argue that Obama is a Muslim or not really born in America or that implying that all his accomplishments were because of affirmative action is just stupid and desperate. However when black people criticize Obama they are called "jealous" or "traitors".  However, although I respect President Obama, he is not the Messiah, he's just a man. Brilliant? Yes. Perfect? No. He is no less a Christian than any other American who hasn't been born-again and doesn't consider the Bible infallible. Does that make him a liar? No but it does mean he needs to get saved.


Look at the following speech where he definitely doesn't look at scripture the way born-again Christians look at the Bible.

Jakes Blasts Franklin Graham for Obama Comments
Enhanced by Zemanta

Egyptian Female Protesters Forced To Take 'Virginity Tests': Report

Sounds like Lara Logan wasn't the only woman who suffered atrocious treatment on the day Egyptians were supposed to be celebrating freedom from a dictator. Some seem to want to trade one tyranny for another. Throw off the bonds of one prison for another: Sharia Law. Read the report at the following link.




Egyptian Female Protesters Forced To Take 'Virginity Tests': Report
Enhanced by Zemanta

YouTube - Paris Thomas

There is a series of ads from the Mormons in an attempt to change the image of the Mormon church.





When I see black people in those ads it always amazes me. I wonder if they ever are told what the founder of the Mormon church, Joseph Smith, thought about black people. Here is a quick video explaining what Mormonism used to teach.



What Mormon Theology Is Really All About
Tags: What Mormon Theology Is Really All About


I know some atheists will look at this video and wonder how regular, historic Christianity is less racist? Some people who have been Christians may have been racist, but that does not mean that the Bible is racist or that it's institutionalized. Don't forget that Mormonism was his idea and we have no proof at all that he didn't just make it up. The Bible is an external text, written by multiple authors, spanning three continents and 1500 years, telling a cohesive story.

YouTube - Paris Thomas
Enhanced by Zemanta

Norman Geisler vs. Paul Kurtz Debate MP3 Audio - Apologetics 315

Here is an awesome debate between Dr Norman Geisler and Dr Paul Kurtz.

An intense debate between Dr. Geisler and Humanist Paul Kurtz (co-author of Humanism Manifesto II). Includes debate on: What is the origin of the Universe? How did life begin on earth? Is Humanism a threat to academic freedom? Is Jesus Christ God? And, Is there a basis for morality?


Norman Geisler vs. Paul Kurtz Debate MP3 Audio - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Apologist Interview: Norman Geisler - Apologetics 315

Brian Auten has conducted a really great interview with Dr Norman Geisler. It wasn't just informative it was enjoyable.  Geisler answered a lot of great questions and gave great advice. IK can't recommend it enough.

Apologist Interview: Norman Geisler - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

DC Comics to Relaunch All Titles at #1 with Same Day Digital Sales [UPDATED] - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews

Well, the big news that broke today in popular media is that DC Comics is going to reboot all of their characters this August. Some characters are going to be completely tossed, some tweaked, and others completely revamped - 52 titles - released in print and digitally simultaneously. The only title that there has been a picture released for is the new Justice League. Superman and Wonder Woman look different. Wonder Woman is in long pants. It's been a few years from since the last reboot, I guess it's time. I like the new line up for Justice League. I'm glad to see Aquaman and Cyborg. I'm also willing to bet the Flash is Barry Allen; Green Lantern is Hal Jordan, and Batman is Bruce Wayne. Yeah, it needs to be disambiguated.

DC Comics to Relaunch All Titles at #1 with Same Day Digital Sales [UPDATED] - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews
Enhanced by Zemanta

THE INTERSECTION | MADNESS & REALITY: Dr. Cornel West Discusses Backlash From Obama Critique With Tavis Smiley [VIDEO]

Watch the full episode. See more Tavis Smiley.





THE INTERSECTION | MADNESS & REALITY: Dr. Cornel West Discusses Backlash From Obama Critique With Tavis Smiley [VIDEO]

Monday, May 30, 2011

Debunking Christianity: What the Bible Says About Apostates Like Me

John Loftus posted the following on his blog:

There is an irreconcilable conflict between Jesus and Paul and Peter when it comes to how to view apostates that were once followers of Jesus. So argues former Pastor Bruce Gerencser.


There is quite a bit wrong with this article. It seems like Bruce Gerencser does not seem to know what faith he walked away from. I thought it might be instructive to respond paragraph by paragraph. My comments are in red.

There is an irreconcilable conflict between Jesus and Paul and Peter when it comes to how to view apostates that were once followers of Jesus

Interesting Premise. Let's see if he can substantiate such a bold assertion.

Progressive, liberal, kind-hearted Christians stress the two great laws emphasized by Jesus in Mark 12:28-33:
And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all? And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
Love God and love your fellow man. All the laws of the Bible are summed up in these two commands, Love God and love your fellow man. If Christians truly embraced these two commands I suspect I would have very little to write about on this blog.

I don't think think that this is a "liberal" position at all. It is the truth of what Jesus taught and sums up not just his teaching but the whole of the Torah. I also agree that many Christians fall short of this ideal. In order for Bruce Gerencser to prove his point, he has to show that "love" does not mean showing error and pointing out falsehood.  He has to show that love does not mean holding others to a standard of  behavior, attitudes, and belief.  

Sadly most CHRISTians live in denial of the teachings of Christ. They are ensconced in the teaching of Paul and Peter, and they most often live lives in total denial of the teachings of the man they claim is their Lord and Savior.

So the crux of his argument is that Paul and Peter taught contradictory theology than Jesus. Again, let's see if he can prove this. 

This is clearly shown by their response to people like me. For some reason, an evangelical pastor turned atheist is such a threat to the Christian faith of some that I must be attacked and ridiculed at every opportunity. So sharp are their attacks that I had to implement comment moderation and limit abusive commenters to one comment. (my thinking is they get one chance to tell me what an awful man I am so they better make it count, kind of like an enema) Angry smile

So did Peter and Paul attack people for leaving Christianity? I don't think so. Bruce Gerencser at least does provide the relevant scriptures in his article. Peter and Paul were not as concerned about people like Gerencser and Loftus who have left and no longer call themselves Christians. The threat is from people like Harold Camping who claim to be Christians but teach totally contradictions and lies - deceiving themselves and others. Loftus and Gerencser are not false brothers in Christ. They are out in the open.


Where does this need to attack and ridicule come from? Is it just a reflection of their lack of civility, maturity or a lack of character? I am sure this explains some of their behavior but I think they really do believe the Bible gives them warrant to say the things they say.
 
It is the lack of civility, maturity, and lack of character. Things that all human beings should be working on. There seems to be a double standard. Atheists can be mean. Condescending. Insulting. And it's okay. But if A Christian shouldn't. Why? Instinctively we know the Bible is true and we, even Atheists, expect more from the God-fearing  than from the Godless.

What does the Bible say?
Peter writes in 2 Peter 2:1-22:

But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly; And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;) The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished: But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord. But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption; And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you; Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children: Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness; But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet. These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever. For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
How does Peter describe people like me?
  • A false teacher who brings upon himself swift destruction
  • A person who, with his words, manipulates people for material gain
  • A person who deserves the judgment and damnation of God
  • A person who is like the people God killed in the flood, the people God killed with fire and brimstone at Sodom and Gomorrah, and like the rebellious angels God cast out of heaven
  • Like a dog who eats its own vomit
  • Like a sow wallowing in the mud
  • Like Balaam
Let’s face it Peter describes people like me in such a way that many Christians conclude we are worthy of all the derision we receive.

Looking closely at Gerencser's bullet list summarizing the above 22 verses, I've got to ask: How does this describe the apostate? By definition a person who outright and publicly becomes an atheist or agnostic, cannot be a false prophet. Someone who stays in the church, pretending to be a brother and sister but instead is an enemy - either purposely or unwittingly. An apostate cannot be this kind of sinner because we all know they are no longer in the Church.

Paul writes in 2 Timothy 3:1-10
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as their’s also was.
Paul paints a lurid picture of apostates like me. Paul says my “folly” will be made manifest to all men and many Christians feel they have the gift of manifestation. Devil

This passage does not just refer to apostates...it refers to all sinners! Jannes and Jambres were Israelites who went against Moses, they paid for their sins. Again they weren't apostates in the same since that Loftus, Gerencser, and Bart Ehrman are apostates. They didn't come out and say "I don't believe in your God, Moses."  Jannes and Jambres challenged Moses leadership and spoke contrary to what God saying that they spoke for the God that delivered Israel up out of Egypt. Loftus, Gerencser, and Ehrman are not doing the same.


Paul writes in Romans 1:16-32:

For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
People like me are described as those who hold the truth in unrighteousness. We worship the creation rather than the creator. We refuse to acknowledge God and we give him no worship or thanks. Our foolish hearts are darkened and we are vain in our imaginations. Result? God gives us over to a reprobate mind.
According to the Bible I am a reprobate, a person beyond the grace of God., a person who has already secured a berth in hell.

Again, Paul is not just talking about Apostates but all those who  deny God by living their own way. The other thing Paul is not saying that all such people are beyond the grace of God. Not all atheists are given over. Some, God still saves them and replace their hearts of stone with hearts of flesh. If one wants salvation, there is still a chance to get right and not be finally turned over to a reprobate mind. I've seen such people, but the majority of cases I see is that God gives multiple opportunities to avoid that state of mind. You just don't know when your last chance is.

In Hebrews 6:4-6 and Hebrews 10:26-29 Paul makes it clear that people like me have no hope of God ever extending grace to us again:

For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
apostasy_exitThese verses make it clear that apostates like me have no second chance. We have spit in the face of God, we have trampled under our feet the blood of Jesus, and we have spited the spirit of grace. We are enemies of God.

I wonder if Gerencser knows that a majority of scholars don't think Paul wrote Hebrews. Guess not. Well, it matters not because the question is has an apostate truly experienced enlightenment. The point of the passage is not that it's possible to fall away but why it's impossible to fall away. Jesus died once and for all. There are no take-backsies or oopsies! One passage that I think is missing from this discussion is 1 John 2:18.19

18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us.

The Bible, if you look at all the passages together, you can't conclude Hebrews is saying that a believer can fall away. 

According to the Bible, since I am a unregenerate, unsaved person I have a deceitful, wicked heart. I am incapable of doing good and I am unable to love in the truest sense of the word. (because true love comes from God)

Not just apostates - EVERYONE!!!

I make no bones about my beliefs. I don’t believe there is a god. I don’t believe that Jesus was God nor do I believe he died on the cross for my sins and resurrected from the dead three days later. I totally reject the Christians concept of original sin. I also reject any notion that suggests the Bible is a divine book written by God, a book that every human being is obligated to obey. I am an atheist.

Fair enough. I think that defines an atheist. If Gerencser had ever been born again, he'll come back to God. Or hopefully, if he hadn't been born again, he can truly be set free and know God as he is and not who he thought God is.

At one time I believed the Bible was the inspired, inerrant Word of God. I believed that there was one God and that Jesus, the son of God, died on the cross for my sins and rose from the dead three days later, thus vanquishing sin and death. I believed that Jesus was the way, truth, and life. As Paul said of himself, I at one time said of myself, I KNOW in whom I have believed…At one time, according to the book of 1 John, I had a know-so salvation.

So what happened? Jesus said in John 3 that we must born again. Head knowledge is not enough. Once one is born, can one become unborn? Nope....didn't think so.

Christian people who meet me, interact with me on Facebook, or trade emails with me are often faced with a dilemma. I am a nice guy who is kind and compassionate most of the time. I love my family and I love my neighbors. My “good” works stack up quite favorably with many of the super-saints that come to this blog to tell me what their God thinks of me. Ask the people who know me about my life and character. I have no doubt the report will be favorable. (I am not perfect to be sure but I am a better Christian than many of the Christians I know)

If Gerencser was a Christian then he would know it's not about your "good works" that makes you justified from your sins. None of us is perfect. None of us is worthy.

All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags; we all shrivel up like a leaf, and like the wind our sins sweep us away. - Isaiah 64:6
 8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.- Ephesians 2:8-10

But, the Bible says……….. I know some Christians want to see me in a good light, but doing so puts them in direct conflict with the Bible. Paul and Peter are not ambiguous on the matter. What’s it going to be?

Paul and Peter were right. And they did not contradict Jesus in the slightest. More on this at the end of this post

I fully understand why some Christians believe that I am a deadly enemy, an enemy they are commanded to wage war against. (Ephesians 6) Thousands of people read this blog and, in the minds of the warring faithful, I am an enemy of their eternal souls. They feel obligated to speak up for God, Jesus, the Bible, and the Christian faith. They feel they will be rewarded by God for standing up for the faith once delivered to the saints. Well done thou good and faith Servant. Enter in……

I don't consider apostates as enemies. Just more people to witness to in hopes that they really catch a hold of God for real and never depart again.Vocal ones like Loftus who have taken it upon themselves to attack that which they once confessed are often used to argue that Christianity is false because if it were true they wouldn't have left it. This doesn't hold up in practice or in the Bible.

Some Christians attempt to navigate a third way when dealing with people like me. They think I was hurt by the Church and that my apostasy is an emotional response to the hateful, nasty, mean-spiritedness that is all too common in Evangelical Christianity. In their minds I am still a Christian, one that has been wounded by the Church.

I think Gerencser is right. People do look at it that way. Of course that isn't what the Bible says. If he thinks the norm and common in Christianity is hateful, nasty, and mean-spiritedness, I'd like to know what churches you have been to, so I don't go there. That hasn't been my experience at all.

I readily admit there is an emotional component to my defection from Christianity. However, it is not the primary reason. The issue is, and remains so, that I do not believe the Bible is truth and I do not have the requisite faith to believe. I am the enemy of God.

So basically, Gerencser agrees with Paul in Romans 8:5-8

  5 Those who live according to the flesh have their minds set on what the flesh desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. 6 The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace. 7 The mind governed by the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. 8 Those who are in the realm of the flesh cannot please God.

I am quite happy when a liberal minded, progressive Christian sincerely attempts to love me as their neighbor but I do understand WHY many Christians respond differently. The Bible is on their side. The liberal minded, progressive Christian has love, compassion, civility, and decency on their side. They are good people. But, if life is all about preparing to meet God, if it is allow about preparing for eternity, if it is all about keeping the commandments of God, then the Bible believers who eviscerate me and attempt to sodomize me with the words of the Bible clearly have God on their side.

I'm not happy with the way we sometimes upset God's message so that it can't be heard over how awful we are and how we treat others. I agree that life is "all about preparing to meet God, if it is all about preparing for eternity, if it is all about keeping the commandments of God". The thing is that without love, compassion, civility, and decency you can't prepare to meet God. At the same time you don't need to compromise truth. Yes, sinners are going to hell. The bad news is that we are sinners and worthy of death. The good news is that Jesus has paid your debt and if you accept Him and obey Him, you receive the righteousness he purchased for you with His own blood. 1 Peter 3:14-16 says:


14 But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. “Do not fear their threats; do not be frightened.” 15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, 16 keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.

I have to say that Gerencser failed to prove a fundamental point he attempted to raise that Jesus taught different than Peter and Paul regarding apostasy. Peter and Paul had strong words against those who twist and subvert scripture for their own selfish and evil ends! So did Jesus. Don't believe it. Look at what He said to the religious leaders of his day!


23 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. 24 You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.
25 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence.
26 Blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and dish, and then the outside also will be clean.
   27 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean. 28 In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness. - Matthew 23:26-28

And this is one of the nicest things Jesus said against them. This is one of the reasons why they hated Jesus so much. He told the truth about them and they weren't apostates. They were "wolves in sheep clothing."  God does not play about leading others astray while pretending to be following Him 


Debunking Christianity: What the Bible Says About Apostates Like Me
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Evidences the Gospels were Based on Eyewitness Accounts - Apologetics 315

Brian Auten posted this great lecture by Dr Peter J Williams about what evidences do we have that point to the Gospels being based on eyewitness accounts. Follow the link to hear it.

Evidences the Gospels were Based on Eyewitness Accounts - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: Anti-Christian Bigotry in Dearborn

DEARBORN, MI - APRIL 22:  A woman holds up a c...Image by Getty Images via @daylifeFor months now David Wood and others have been pointing to the changes in a society where Muslims become the majority. Islam is not just a religion, as we think of religion in West. It's political, social, economic - a way of life. We have also heard that in such a society Christians are persecuted. Could this happen in the United States. Of course. We know that Muslims are persecuted in most societies where they are the minority. The difference is that when Christians persecute anyone, they are acting in direct opposition to what the Bible says but when Muslims persecute non-Muslims they are following the Qur'an. David Wood posted the following video from a Christian who lives in Dearborn, Michigan which has Muslims as the majority.




Answering Muslims: Anti-Christian Bigotry in Dearborn
Enhanced by Zemanta

Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Eavesdropping on Campingites

NEW YORK, NY - MAY 13: Osvaldo Colon walks the...Image by Getty Images via @daylifeJames Swan has posted some comments from Harold Camping's supporters for how his heresy mistake in predicting the Rapture has affected their own lives as well as people they know.


Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Eavesdropping on Campingites
Enhanced by Zemanta

Iron Sharpens Iron: Mark Allison: Harold Camping Still Defiant

Dr Mark Allison was interviewed recently on Iron Sharpens Iron. He discussed Harold Camping's defiant and stubborn attitude. Follow the link to hear it.

Iron Sharpens Iron: Mark Allison: Harold Camping Still Defiant
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Bible illustration blog: Drawing the Ark of the Covenant.

The Ark of the CovenantImage via WikipediaI really enjoy the Bible Illustration Blog! The latest post is about the theories and ideas around how the Ark of the Covenant actually looked! Did the cherubim on the lid use both wing to cover the mercy seat? Did the poles run parallel with the long side? Short side? These questions are asked and discussed. This is a wonderful job!!!!

The Bible illustration blog: Drawing the Ark of the Covenant.
Enhanced by Zemanta

A Lesser-Known Heretic That You Should Know About

Jamin Hubner posted a blog article pointing out that although Harold Camping has been getting a lot of attention there are other heretical folks with a platform. Hubner explains the teachings of Pastor Joel Finck, who like Camping, thinks he is the only one who understands God. Hubner exposes Finck's mistaken theologies. Follow the link to read Hubner's post.

A Lesser-Known Heretic That You Should Know About
Enhanced by Zemanta