Friday, January 20, 2012

FacePalm of the Day - Debunking Christianity: Why Do Christians Disagree?

John Loftus has posted his opinion again. This time arguing that there could not be a God because Christians don't agree with one another on several doctrinal issues. He wites

Why is it Christians cannot agree to the point where they have condemned each other to hell and/or slaughtered each other because of doctrinal differences that other Christians don't think are essential for salvation? My answer is that Christianity is man made, and as such, doctrinal differences are due to different human ways of understanding the Bible. There is no divine mind behind the Bible, otherwise God should have communicated his will much better than he supposedly did. That's the major reason why there is no doctrinal Christian unity. These different doctrinal understandings continue to be used by denominational leaders to differentiate between Christianities for financial gain and power. Christian, what's your answer?

A truly facepalm inducing paragraph causing groans to match. I'm amazed at this. Apparently to John Loftus, anyone who claims to be a "Christian" is just as "Christian" as anyone else, no matter what they believes. In  order to even begin such a silly argument, this presupposition must be in it's centerpiece. Along with the the thought that all denominations of Christianity are so different that we can't even begin to live peaceably. Another false canard. I'm not saying that there haven't been wars fought and mistakes made - but these were human mistakes not God's. Also I am not saying that there aren't important differences, but none are important enough to kill another over. The reason why we have so many problems because we have refused to obey the word of God. On nonessential issues this what the Bible says:

 1 Accept the one whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable matters. 2 One person’s faith allows them to eat anything, but another, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. 3 The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them. 4 Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand.
 5 One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike. Each of them should be fully convinced in their own mind. 6 Whoever regards one day as special does so to the Lord. Whoever eats meat does so to the Lord, for they give thanks to God; and whoever abstains does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God. 7 For none of us lives for ourselves alone, and none of us dies for ourselves alone. 8 If we live, we live for the Lord; and if we die, we die for the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord. 9 For this very reason, Christ died and returned to life so that he might be the Lord of both the dead and the living.
 10 You, then, why do you judge your brother or sister? Or why do you treat them with contempt? For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat. 11 It is written:
   “‘As surely as I live,’ says the Lord,
‘every knee will bow before me;
   every tongue will acknowledge God.’”

 12 So then, each of us will give an account of ourselves to God.
 13 Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother or sister. 14 I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for that person it is unclean. 15 If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil. 17 For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, 18 because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and receives human approval.
 19 Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a person to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. 21 It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother or sister to fall.
 22 So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who does not condemn himself by what he approves. 23 But whoever has doubts is condemned if they eat, because their eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin. - Romans 14


Debunking Christianity: Why Do Christians Disagree?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Open Marriages Aren't Wrong? –Newt Gingrich Is - News - GOOD

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 31:  Former Speaker of ...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
I don't think that it is plainly hypocritical for Newt Gingrich to judge Bill Clinton for his infidelity and that the public has the right to know and yet claim that his own infidelity should be private. I don't think Gingrich's hypocrisy makes open marriage correct. I don't see any reason to change the definition of traditional heterosexual and monogamous marriage. However, Gingrich inability to remain faithful to his wife (and being unapologetic about it), sure doesn't fill me with confidence that he would be a good President.





Open Marriages Aren't Wrong–Newt Gingrich Is - News - GOOD

Enhanced by Zemanta

The World of Mobile Phones [infographic]


mobile-phone-Inforgraphic


The World of Mobile Phones [infographic]

WWF - Bible Style

Dr Mariottini has begun a series of articles unpacking Genesis 32:22-30 where Jacob experienced God in a  very unique way. He wrestled God.  I think everyone should read the passage and Mariottini's articles because he brings up questions I never really considered before. God said that Jacob won the match. What does that mean? What did Jacob win? Did God take a dive? What? The article is great for considering such questions and more. It's a great example of what exegesis is supposed to look like. Read the articles at the following links.

The God Who Loses | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament


What Happens When God Loses? | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament


In addition you can hear a song by the group Hazakim and you can hear story in Hip Hop!


Enhanced by Zemanta

Aaron McGruder of 'Boondocks' on Working with George Lucas and His Future In Comics - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews

Aaron McGruder gave an awesome interview on his work on the movie Red Tails, and his career and working with George Lucas. .

Aaron McGruder of 'Boondocks' on Working with George Lucas and His Future In Comics - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, January 19, 2012

More on SOPA

We have more information today on what the protests against SOPA/PIPA yesterday accomplished. It seems like it was very successful but we can't get laxed. I don't really think that this is far from over but people have managed to show Congress just how much we don't like the idea of the Government controlling what is on the Internet.


 
PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet from Fight for the Future on Vimeo.


Wednesday, January 18, 2012

SOPA/PIPA are bad ideas

Today, January 18, 2012, several internet sites "went dark" - meaning they shut down to protest two pending laws  we are in danger of being passed. I've seen several  good web articles covering this today. Here are some snippets that will help you understand what is going on if you have not been following this.

Simply put, the kind of copyright laws SOPA supporters (which include companies like CBS and Viacom and organizations like the MPAA and the game industry's own ESA) seek would make it very hard, if not impossible, to foster the kind of creative space we have carved out here at Experience Points. Government-endorsed censorship, blacklists, and monopolies have no place in the video game sphere, on the Internet, or any in any other realm of human culture and society.

Stop SOPA and PIPA

As promised, several major sites on the Internet have gone dark today in protest of SOPA—the Stop Online Piracy Act, a bill that’s making its way through Congress as I type. The intention is good, but the proposed execution is horrifying: SOPA is intended to counter those pirating movies and other content illegally, but as Google explains, the bill would lead to paralyzing censorship. SOPA could shut down sites like Crushable, if we posted a video that a movie studio didn’t approve of.

SOPA Blackout: The Best Tweets From The #FactsWithoutWikipedia Meme

The reason everyone's getting so upset about the Stop Online Piracy Act is because it isn't just meant to crack down on those of us illegally downloading the new Adele single or watching that HBO show on Megavideo. SOPA casts such a wide net that it would affect the entire online experience as we know it, in ways that reach far beyond the goal of preventing file-sharing. It's easy to feel overwhelmed by the possibilities amid the kerfuffle—words like "censorship" and "felony" have been throw around a lot lately. So we're telling you about some concrete changes that SOPA would set in motion. What would a post-SOPA internet look like? Here's a glimpse of a dystopian future.


What Would a Post-SOPA Internet Look Like?

The Stop Online Piracy Act asserts itself so broadly—it aims to regulate everything from counterfeit prescription drugs to intellectual property rights—that it’s difficult to begin to imagine all the ramifications. The only thing I know for sure about SOPA is that it would be a very bad thing for people who frequently use the internet—so, everyone—and that it would sit its big, weighty body on the fragile skeleton of free expression and crush it into a million little splinters. It would inspire fear in everyone who creates content online, even if they’re only doing it for their own Facebook friends, because most of us are ignorantly pirating or consuming pirated best-of clips of Groundskeeper Willie, making the sites we use most liable. YouTube, Twitter, Wikipedia, Google, Wikileaks: What we’re facing here is the death of fun, the end of profound, drool-inducing engrossment in 50 pages of someone’s sporadically-chronicled life, a ban on giggling alone at your desk.

How SOPA Would Kill Fun

Another video that should be watched is this one!

PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet from Fight for the Future on Vimeo.



There is even a theme song for the protest!




The Day The LOLcats Died - #SOPA #PIPA Protest Song

One of the things we can loose is the legal right to post some interesting images, movies, and other user-created things. No more internet memes. This would be tragic. One meme I've been enjoying the past 3-4 months came from the video game Elder Scroll V: Skyrim.The line is  "I used to be an adventurer like you, until I took an arrow in the knee!".  The line has been recast in very interesting ways. Including this one dealing with SOPA/PIPA.




I used to be a blogger like you, then I took a SOPA and PIPA in the knee!

I Used to be a Blogger Like You… [Pic]
Enhanced by Zemanta

Anti-Ninja Turtle Propaganda - YouTube

I'm all for protecting children from corruption of anti-Biblical ideals and messages, but this goes a way too far.




I think that what is bad is that these guys (keep in mind the video is form the late 80's early 90's) have no idea what they are talking about. Yes, the Bible does condemn witchcraft and using magic (and for very good reason) bur magic has nothing to do with ninjutsu or ninjas! If you are going to make an argument please base it on accurate knowledge! Unfortunately they get a lot wrong! It makes all Christians look bad. Anti-Ninja Turtle Propaganda - YouTube

Take a look a the awesome write up from Comics Alliance: Religious Anti-Ninja Turtle Propaganda from the Ancient World [Video] Read More: http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/01/18/ninja-turtles-christians-canadians-witchcraft-video/#ixzz1jsoA66Fm

William Lane Craig's Cambridge Union Society Debate - Apologetics 315

Thanks to Brian Auten for calling attention to this: The two on two debate during William Lane Craig's Reasonable Faith tour.

William Lane Craig and Peter S. Williams debate atheists Arif Ahmed and Andrew Copson on the topic: This House Believes That God is Not a Delusion.





William Lane Craig's Cambridge Union Society Debate - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

Is What We Have Now What They Wrote Then? Audio and Video by Daniel B. Wallace - Apologetics 315

Brian Auten has called attention to a lecture by Daniel Wallace at Biola University. In it he discusses why we can be sure that the Bible accurately represents what the Bible's authors originally wrote! You should watch these!






Brian even posted the audio on his blog.

Is What We Have Now What They Wrote Then? Audio and Video by Daniel B. Wallace - Apologetics 315
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Purity Bear - YouTube

I'm all for curbing pre-maritial sex and fornication and all, but I don't think these are good arguments.




We should just say what the Bible says and if we can get people the Gospel and they get saved, they will grow in God and this issue would be moot because they won't want to displease God but would want to obey God.

The Purity Bear - YouTube

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Answering Muslims: Richard Butrick: The Golden Age of Islam - A Second Look

David Wood has pointed out an interesting article about the history of the Islamic World.

Richard Butrick has written an excellent article on the so-called "Golden Age of Islam," i.e. the mythical period in history when the Muslim world led humanity in science and mathematics, and Christians and Jews lived in an interfaith paradise under Muslim rule.

Read more at the following link!

Answering Muslims: Richard Butrick: The Golden Age of Islam - A Second Look
Enhanced by Zemanta

Coincidences in the Bible | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament

Dr Mariottini has posted another must-read article. He writes:

Adam Jacobs, in his article “The Scientific Foreknowledge of the Jewish Sages,” published in Algemeiner, reviews the book by Haim Shore, Coincidences in the Bible and in Biblical Hebrew. Shore is a Professor of Engineering at Ben Gurion University, in Israel.
This seems like an interesting article on an interesting book. I think it brings up issues that I have never really seen anyone who thinks the Bible was written by ignorant morons seriously explains the points raised in this book. I think such things are evidence that God revealing information and technology to the Jewish people that was unavailable to their neighbors! Click threw to learn more!

Coincidences in the Bible | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament

Evolution and the American Pastor | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament

Dr Mariottini continues to posts great articles. This one is no different. It's an infographic summarizing the results of a survey of American pastors on the subject of evolution.




Dr. Mariottini wrote:

Maybe one of these days I will have to write a post to explain how Christians came to believe that the earth is only 6,000 old. Those who know the background of this date also know that this date is unreliable.

I agree with him.


Evolution and the American Pastor | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament

Monday, January 16, 2012

Calvinistic "Quotes": Of Your Own Free Will, Might You Avoid Sin?

Portrait of Martin Luther as an Augustinian Monk
Image via Wikipedia
Awesome quote!

For if out of your own free will you might avoid sin and do that which pleases God, what need would you have of Christ?


Calvinistic "Quotes": Of Your Own Free Will, Might You Avoid Sin?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Truthbomb Apologetics: 84 Confirmed Facts in the Last 16 Chapters of the Book of Acts

Cover of "I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be...
Cover via Amazon
Chad posted a good article that he made from a list of 84 confirmed facts that Luke got right in the Book of Acts.The list is by Norman L. Geisler and Frank Turek in I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist, p. 256-259. You should really take a look at this!


Truthbomb Apologetics: 84 Confirmed Facts in the Last 16 Chapters of the Book of Acts
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, January 14, 2012

The 7 deadly sins of the computer age

What if you have a Mac? LOL

The 7 deadly sins of the computer age
Enhanced by Zemanta

EU threatens to withhold financial support from Hungary over definition of marriage: report | LifeSiteNews.com

I found this article because of a Tweet from Dr. James White. It discusses the European nation known As Hungary's attempts to remain sovereign and keep it's traditional Christian values and shunning abortion and not recognizing homosexual unions as marriage despite pressure from the European Union,


The so-called “Easter constitution” adopted in the post-Communist country last May was a major shakeup for Hungarian politics and an outrage to progressive EU ideology: the document not only supported marriage but declared that the unborn child deserves protection from the moment of conception, and even made special mention of Christianity as lying at the heart of the country’s identity. The document’s discussion of human rights also does not mention sexual orientation, another break from EU priorities.
The Hungarian daily Magyar Nemzet claimed this week that the EU would move to drop financial aid to Hungary unless officials there scratched the marriage definition and dropped criminal charges against former Socialist Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany, according to unnamed sources in Brussels. A spokesperson for the European commissioner for economic affairs called the allegation “nonsense,” according to the Wall Street Journal.

Read the whole article as the following link.

EU threatens to withhold financial support from Hungary over definition of marriage: report | LifeSiteNews.com