William Lane Craig vs. Marcus Borg: The Resurrection MP3 Audio - Apologetics 315

I found another great debate from Apologetics 315.  Here is what Brian wrote:

William Lane Craig debates New Testament scholar Marcus Borg on the topic of the resurrection. Borg's position is that the resurrection is "really true," even though it is not "literally true." Daryl Schmidt and Darrell Bock offer further comments. Also added to the WLC Audio Debate Feed.

Full MP3 Audio here. (2hr 14min)

I was real disappointed with Marcus Borg's arguments. To be a Christian means that you believe in the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. You can't be born again unless you believe that Jesus was crucified for our sins and raised for our justification. That is definitional and what separates Christianity from every other religion and world view! Without it you don't have Christianity. Everything hangs on that. Because of this, I have no idea why Borg would argue that he is a Christian or that it doesn't matter if Jesus' tomb was empty or what happened to Jesus' body? This is the crux of "the Gospel". What ever he is smoking, I don't want any of it.


William Lane Craig vs. Marcus Borg: The Resurrection MP3 Audio - Apologetics 315