I have been waiting for the opportunity to see this debate. You can follow the he link below so you can see watch the debate.
The Great Debate: Does the Bible Adequately Answer for the Problem of Suffering
The debate is awesome. The problems of suffering and the existence of evil are the most powerful objection to Christianity but it has no teeth. It has no power. I love to hear Michael Brown. He did a greast Job. Ehrman is right about what the point is: Does the Bible give a coherent answer let alone an adequate answer. I don't get why Ehrman wants to give a single answer to problem in which the Bible gives multiple answers to multiple for different situations. The good does suffer and so does the wicked. The one thing I wish that there was more time was for Brown to answer Ehrman's points on how he thinks the Bible gives contradictory information and answers and how does Ehrman knows what is good and what is bad for people?
Personal blog that will cover my personal interests. I write about Christian Theology and Apologetics, politics, culture, science, and literature.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Debunking Christianity: The Omniscience Escape Clause
John Loftus accuses Christians of answering the "Problem of human suffering" by claiming that God's will is a mystery.
We've heard this escape clause so many times before. "My ways are not your ways," an ancient superstitious canonized Biblical text says of God. "How do we know what an omniscient God might do?" an apologist chimes in. It could be how God purportedly communicated to us in ways that are indistinguishable from anything else we see in the ancient world, or the tragedy of the Haitian earthquake, or a child suffering and soon to die from Leukemia. How can we judge an omniscient God's ways we're asked over and over, with an implied "We can't." The answer is obvious. We must be able to understand enough of God's ways to know that his ways are good and that he knows what he's doing. It's that simple. If God does not act as a loving person would do then all we can reasonably conclude is that God is not acting like a loving person would do. And if God does not respond in discernible loving ways when tragic events take place then it looks entirely as if tragic events happen randomly without his ever-watchful eye.
I have a four issues with Loftus' analysis:
1. Does this mean that Loftus thinks that the earliest copies of Isaiah does not have text we have in Isaiah 55:8-9?
2. How does the fact that people are suffering prove that God is not loving?
3. I agree with Loftus when he wrote:
How does Loftus know that we can't understand enough of God's ways to know that God is good? Dare, I say that it? Yes, I should. It requires a relationship with God. something an Atheist can't have.
4. How does Loftus know "God does not respond in discernible loving ways when tragic events take place then it looks entirely as if tragic events happen randomly without his ever-watchful eye." Duh! Of course you cannot see God's movement or loving ways if you don't know God. it takes a relationship.
Also the old saying "God works in mysterious ways." is a colloquial one not a Biblical one. We can know God. We can know Him for ourselves.
"Seeking his face" means getting to know God.
Debunking Christianity: The Omniscience Escape Clause
We've heard this escape clause so many times before. "My ways are not your ways," an ancient superstitious canonized Biblical text says of God. "How do we know what an omniscient God might do?" an apologist chimes in. It could be how God purportedly communicated to us in ways that are indistinguishable from anything else we see in the ancient world, or the tragedy of the Haitian earthquake, or a child suffering and soon to die from Leukemia. How can we judge an omniscient God's ways we're asked over and over, with an implied "We can't." The answer is obvious. We must be able to understand enough of God's ways to know that his ways are good and that he knows what he's doing. It's that simple. If God does not act as a loving person would do then all we can reasonably conclude is that God is not acting like a loving person would do. And if God does not respond in discernible loving ways when tragic events take place then it looks entirely as if tragic events happen randomly without his ever-watchful eye.
I have a four issues with Loftus' analysis:
1. Does this mean that Loftus thinks that the earliest copies of Isaiah does not have text we have in Isaiah 55:8-9?
8 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,"
declares the LORD.
9 "As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.
2. How does the fact that people are suffering prove that God is not loving?
3. I agree with Loftus when he wrote:
We must be able to understand enough of God's ways to know that his ways are good and that he knows what he's doing.
How does Loftus know that we can't understand enough of God's ways to know that God is good? Dare, I say that it? Yes, I should. It requires a relationship with God. something an Atheist can't have.
4. How does Loftus know "God does not respond in discernible loving ways when tragic events take place then it looks entirely as if tragic events happen randomly without his ever-watchful eye." Duh! Of course you cannot see God's movement or loving ways if you don't know God. it takes a relationship.
Also the old saying "God works in mysterious ways." is a colloquial one not a Biblical one. We can know God. We can know Him for ourselves.
13 "When I shut up the heavens so that there is no rain, or command locusts to devour the land or send a plague among my people, 14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land. - 2 Chronicles 7:13-14
"Seeking his face" means getting to know God.
28And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. 29For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. - Romans 8:28-29
1Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God—this is your spiritual act of worship. 2Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will. - Roman 12:1-2
Debunking Christianity: The Omniscience Escape Clause
YouTube - Does God Exist - Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig Part-1 of 14
It has just come to my attention that the debate between Christopher Hitchens and William Lane Craig has been posted on YouTube!
YouTube - Does God Exist - Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig Part-1 of 14
YouTube - Does God Exist - Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig Part-1 of 14
Brennon's Thoughts: Questions for Anti-Molinist Inerrantists
Brennon has asked some great questions on his blog that he believes Molinism answers, but God's decrees does not. My comments are in red.How do you explain how God knew the two divergent paths that God foresaw if Zedekiah either chose to surrender to the king of Babylon or not (Jeremiah 38:17-18)? Assuming this was a free choice, God told Jeremiah to tell Zedekiah that if he chose to submit to Babylon, he, his city, and his family would all live. But God also foresaw the other possibility; what would happen if Zedekiah did not surrender, namely his death and his city's destruction. God obviously knew what would happen, and which choice Zedekiah would make. But God also knew what would happen if Zedekiah made the other choice.
I agree God knows each and every possibility and probability. God knew what Zedekiah would not surrender. I don't really see how that supports Molinism. I mean in order for everything that plays out the way that it did, the Babylonians had to destroy Jerusalem. Don't forget the fall of Jerusalem was prophesied many times before this point. I'm not saying that Zedekiah did not do what he himself wanted to do, but what I am saying that it's not a surprise because God already called this one centuries before through several prophets. Check out Habakkuk 1 which some scholars date to the late 7th century BC and considering that Zedekiah made this decision around 586 BC - about 100 years later. Should not be a shock or a surprise.
How did Jesus know what Sodom would have done IF His miracles had been performed there in Matthew 11:23?
Jesus knew because Jesus is God and God knows everything. Again I don't see how that supports Molinism. I think a more important question that if God knew Sodom would have repented if Jesus had performed his miracles, then why didn't God do that and prevent destroying them? The answer is that it was part of the overall plan God has. Where all things works together for them that love God and are called according to God's purpose (Romans 8:28-29) . God's will and purpose and ours.
How did Jesus know what would happen if the disciples cast their net to the opposite side of their boat (John 21:6)?
Again Jesus knows everything. The question this begs is. Were the fish on the opposite side of the Boat because they just happened to be there or were they there because God told them to be there? I don't know. In such a situation, maybe it doesn't matter. I'd go the rout of decree because of all the little things that had to line up for those fish to be there. The weather, the currents, the time of day, the tides (gravitational forces on the water from the moon, sun, and other heavenly bodies), the life interactions and histories of each and every fish and their parents going back to the days of creation - had to line up just right for those fish to be on the side of the boat Jesus told them to throw their nets to. Not to mention all the factors I left out. Why would we not serve a God like that?
Oh, and those of you who reject Molinism because of James White's weak polemic, you really need to repudiate that ridiculous picture he has floating around the web with Craig and the Pope. That's a pretty blatant genetic fallacy if I ever saw one.
I know when I saw that graphic Brennon mentioned I re-posted it myself. I didn't really stop to think that it might offend some people. If it did, I'm sorry. However, i think it illustrates some key points.
1. In his debate with Christopher Hitchens, William Lane Craig said Calvinism was a false Christianity. I don't think that is true at all. No more than calling Jacob Arminius a heretic and claiming anyone who agree with him as bing hell-bound.
2. Molina came up with Molinism because he wanted to give an answer against the Reformers who began preaching that God was in complete control of everything regardless of what our free will says. Molina was a Roman Catholic clergyman and that was his job - come up with a counter answer. From what I can tell only Dr. William Lane Craig reaslly expounds on his ideas today and it's not popular in Roman Catholicism..
3. Picturing Craig with the Pope is not a genetic fallacy given that that Molinism is Roman Catholic invention and Craig has embraced the approach of magnifying the commonalities among Christians and downplaying the things we disagree on - y'know like the sinlessness of Mary and her being a Co-Redeemer with Christ. Not all Roman Catholics hold these ideas, but the Pope does. Give the turns that WLC have made (not neccessarily sinful or bad) I see every reason to make the tie with the Roman Catholic Church.Brennon's Thoughts: Questions for Anti-Molinist Inerrantists
Labels:
Brennon,
Catholic Church,
Christianity,
God,
Jesus,
Middle Knowledge,
William Lane Craig,
Zedekiah
How Not to Witness
This strip is funny and sad at the same time. It presupposes that faith and logic are incompatible at best and antithetical at worst. I must disagree. They are not. Unfortunately, many Christians have little else to back up what they believe other than "personal revelation". We should have more to say than that. As a Christian if your personal revelation conflict with the Bible, then it can't be from God. Of course skeptics ask how do we know we can trust the Bible? I think that is where Evidential Apologetics comes into play. We can rationally and logically show that there is plenty of evidence to accept the Bible as true. I've posted quite a bit information on the blog from various sources showing why the Bible is reliable.
zILhNlnaZZaXhaeprc.jpg (PNG Image, 700x300 pixels)
zILhNlnaZZaXhaeprc.jpg (PNG Image, 700x300 pixels)
Labels:
Apologetics,
Bible,
Bible study,
Christian,
Christianity,
faith,
God,
Graphics,
Humor,
Religion and Spirituality,
Revelation,
Skepticism
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
YouTube - Voice of Revolution Interviews an Atheist after Brown / Ehrman Debate at OSU
Here is an interview with an atheist who attended the debate between Dr. Michael Brown and Bart Ehrman.
YouTube - Voice of Revolution Interviews an Atheist after Brown / Ehrman Debate at OSU
YouTube - Voice of Revolution Interviews an Atheist after Brown / Ehrman Debate at OSU
Labels:
Bart Ehrman,
Debates,
History,
Interview,
Michael Brown,
YouTube
Brennon's Thoughts: Verses All Arminians Should Know Part 4
Brennon has posted a great list of scriptures that support Arminianism. I'm not certain that they support the Arminian position. Rather than try to responding to them all at once, I will break them down into several posts based on how the list is presented.This topic interests me because I really wanna know what the Bible says. Here is part 4 regarding the idea that Bible teaches that we must remain in Christ to remain secure. How does the Bible say we remain in Christ? We know and I think all Christians agrees that there is no security outside of Christ. How does one get out of Christ? One doesn't.
Verses that show we must remain in Christ to be secure:
This passage is one of those I have actually seen lived out. I've seen people who for a time show all the signs of true repentance, even being delivered miraculously, and then leave Christianity. This passage is dealing with apostasy. I have also seen people leave the church and come back. The passage is not telling us that these people were really regenerated or born-again.
What if a man does not persevere? He will not receive the crown of life God promised - showing that the man does not love God. If a man does not love God he can't be saved.
There is no argument that we must remain in Jesus to know our salvation is secure. We must work at growing and putting on our full armor. We must deny ourselves. Beat our wills to submission to Christ. For a lot of people, saying that we are eternally secure means that we can do whatever we want and don't have to do anything to be saved. I think that this is a huge problem.. No where does the Bible say that. There is much required of us not for salvation be because we are saved.
Good works should follow salvation. God wants us to be busy but he also wants us to be assured that He's is in control and we don't have to worry about being lost just concern ourselves with living for Him.
Yes, Jesus was talking about the 12 in context, but why would it not apply to us today? I find much assurance in the following passages I will end with.
Brennon's Thoughts: Verses All Arminians Should Know
Verses that show we must remain in Christ to be secure:
17If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18do not boast over those branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19You will say then, "Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in." 20Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but be afraid. 21For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.No where in the passage does the Paul tells us that it is by our work that we are grafted in. God grafts us in. God cuts off. God is clearly saying that. The passage is not telling us how we get out of Christ of our own choice any more than we can get into Christ.
22Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. 23And if they do not persist in unbelief, they will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24After all, if you were cut out of an olive tree that is wild by nature, and contrary to nature were grafted into a cultivated olive tree, how much more readily will these, the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree!
2By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.I don't think that the passage is at all telling us how people fall off. It is telling us that we must hold firm to the truth and I don't see how it is saying that we can walk away from Jesus. Only if we do we not anything we do prior is pointless.
3But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people. 4Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. 5For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person—such a man is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.[a] 6Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God's wrath comes on those who are disobedient. 7Therefore do not be partners with them.This passage is telling us if we live such evil lives, we show that we are not in Christ, not that you can be once in christ and then these actions puts you out.
21Once you were alienated from God and were enemies in your minds because of[a] your evil behavior. 22But now he has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation— 23if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel. This is the gospel that you heard and that has been proclaimed to every creature under heaven, and of which I, Paul, have become a servant.Paul is saying that if you continues in faith, you know that Jesus reconciled you. It's not saying that it is dependent on us.
10Therefore, my brothers, be all the more eager to make your calling and election sure. For if you do these things, you will never fall,Peter is not saying that that we elect ourselves by obeying what we know we ought to do. Peter is saying that we know our election is true by obeying. Everyone is fallen, but thanks to Jesus, not us, we don't have to stay there.
20If they have escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and are again entangled in it and overcome, they are worse off at the end than they were at the beginning. 21It would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than to have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred command that was passed on to them. 22Of them the proverbs are true: "A dog returns to its vomit," and, "A sow that is washed goes back to her wallowing in the mud."
This passage is one of those I have actually seen lived out. I've seen people who for a time show all the signs of true repentance, even being delivered miraculously, and then leave Christianity. This passage is dealing with apostasy. I have also seen people leave the church and come back. The passage is not telling us that these people were really regenerated or born-again.
4It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, 6if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.Is the passage saying that it's impossible for those who have saved to fall away or that's impossible for apostates to be brought back? I think that it is not talking about born-again salvation. Again people get "saved" and go back out to the world all the time. They hear and agree with the Gospel and then when things get hard or the euphoria wears off they go back to being who they are. There is no transformation. No real change. I think the writer of Hebrews is not suggesting that it's possible for a believer to leave Jesus, only why it's impossible for a born-again Christian to walk away from God. It seem mind boggling for people to know first-hand what God is offering them and then refuse it. However people do.
19Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, 20by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, his body, 21and since we have a great priest over the house of God, 22let us draw near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled to cleanse us from a guilty conscience and having our bodies washed with pure water. 23Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful. 24And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds. 25Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.Let's look at verse 26 in context. of verses 19-31 as a whole. A direct parallel is made with the blood sacrifices of the Old Testament and we are told that if we go on sinning there can be no other sacrifice because Jesus is the last one. I think the passage is not talking about unbelievers insulting the Spirit because this is something a born-again person would not do.
26If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. 28Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? 30For we know him who said, "It is mine to avenge; I will repay," and again, "The Lord will judge his people." 31It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
12Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him.
What if a man does not persevere? He will not receive the crown of life God promised - showing that the man does not love God. If a man does not love God he can't be saved.
19My brothers, if one of you should wander from the truth and someone should bring him back, 20remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the error of his way will save him from death and cover over a multitude of sins.Verse 20 is talking about all repentant sinners not just those who wander away. Again I don't think anyone would argue that sometimes Christians wander away just like wayward sheep. It's not addressing those who leave and never come back. The language suggests a temporary scenario.
There is no argument that we must remain in Jesus to know our salvation is secure. We must work at growing and putting on our full armor. We must deny ourselves. Beat our wills to submission to Christ. For a lot of people, saying that we are eternally secure means that we can do whatever we want and don't have to do anything to be saved. I think that this is a huge problem.. No where does the Bible say that. There is much required of us not for salvation be because we are saved.
8For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9not by works, so that no one can boast. 10For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do. - Ephesians 2:8-10
Good works should follow salvation. God wants us to be busy but he also wants us to be assured that He's is in control and we don't have to worry about being lost just concern ourselves with living for Him.
While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled. - John 17:12
Yes, Jesus was talking about the 12 in context, but why would it not apply to us today? I find much assurance in the following passages I will end with.
37No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:37-39
4In all my prayers for all of you, I always pray with joy 5because of your partnership in the gospel from the first day until now, 6being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus. - Philippians 1:4-6
Brennon's Thoughts: Verses All Arminians Should Know
Labels:
Arminianism,
Bible,
Bible Exegesis,
Brennon,
Calvinism,
Christian,
Christianity,
God,
Holy Spirit,
Jesus
The Bible, textual criticism, variants, manuscripts, James White and Bart Ehrman | True Freethinker
I'm not sure if I've posted this video before, but in case I didn't I would like to post it here and I appreciate Mariano for posting it on his blog and calling attention to this lecture from James White on why we should trust the New Testament text.
The Bible, textual criticism, variants, manuscripts, James White and Bart Ehrman | True Freethinker
The Bible, textual criticism, variants, manuscripts, James White and Bart Ehrman | True Freethinker
Hermeneutics: on how to properly interpret……..DNA!?!?! | True Freethinker
Mariano has posted a great article comparing and contrasting hermeneutic approaches to the Bible, the US Constitution, and DNA. It's an excellent article.Hermeneutics: on how to properly interpret……..DNA!?!?! | True Freethinker
Labels:
Bible,
Christianity,
Constitution,
DNA,
Hermeneutics,
Mariano,
Mariano Grinbank,
US Constitution
Apologetics 315: Terminology Tuesday: Polemics
In Brian Auten's latest terminology article, "Polemics" is defined. definitely worth checking out.
Apologetics 315: Terminology Tuesday: Polemics
Apologetics 315: Terminology Tuesday: Polemics
Is Christianity against progress / anti-science? | True Freethinker
John Lennox discusses what the relationship between Christianity and Science. Thanks to Mariano posting this video.
Is Christianity against progress / anti-science? | True Freethinker
Is Christianity against progress / anti-science? | True Freethinker
Monday, July 12, 2010
YouTube - 2.1 Deconversion: Prayer
Here is another post in my series answering Evid3nc3's Youtube videos discussing why he walked away from Christianity. It's been a while so in case you didn't see the other posts or Evid3nc3's series let me just say that this is a great series of videos describing the process that one man underwent in leaving Christianity. In the following video, he discusses why prayer led him away from God.
I am very surprised that I have read that many apostates and atheists find these arguments good. The main problem with his arguments it makes me wonder if he understood what the Assemblies of God teach about prayer. Like him I grew up thinking that prayer was as he initially defined it. But like him I was a child at the time. Also like him, I also came to the conclusion that we much pray according to God's will. But there is several differences between what the Assemblies of God teaches and what you he has has presented.
1. God's will isn't subjective. If you want to know God's plan for your life and your purpose, you can know it. One way to know is to see if what you think God's will is lines up with the Bible. If it does not then you know it's you who is wrong.
2. Why would God grant the selfish prayers we pray? If the point of prayer is for us to commune with God and to draw closer to God, then why would God give us superpowers or make us a robot or and flight of fancy we might imagine? How would that help us? It wouldn't. Thankfully he seemed to have realized that.
3. God does not want us to just pray for things that might happen anyway. I learned that God does supply our needs. Sometimes not the way we expect but what is best.
4. I also notice that people just amaze me when they talk about prayer. Can this guy really say all the time in Church he never experienced nor ever seen God move miraculously and intervene in his life or anyone he knows? Has he never seen the peace of God manifested in the life of one whom has not natural reason to be peace of mind? I've seen God bless and help me and those I know in ways that defy description or understanding. Just for starters. One of my first cousins was murdered 5 years ago and my aunt blesses and praises God (as we all do) for keeping her and comforting her. I know people God healed of cancer after medical science gave up on them. I myself was healed of juvenile arthritis. Our church mother was hit by a hummer 3 years ago and was told she would never fully recover, but she has. I could go on and on. All of these things build a relationship with God founded on the fact that God shows us that no matter what happens we can trust God.
5. That's the number one thing I hear missing from the stories ex-Christians tell: a relationship. Where God talks and they listen.
I've spent some time thinking about apostasy. The Bible talks about becoming a Christian from the point of view of a complete change. The Bible uses the same language as in a caterpillar turning into a butterfly. Once a caterpillar becomes a butterfly the animal can never turn back into a caterpillar. Same thing is true of a born-again Christian.
Romans 12:2 says
The word translated "transformed" is "Metamorphoo" and we get the word "metamorphosis" from it. You can't undo this once God starts this process. This is also how we know that the will of God is.
One last thing: How do we know that the purpose is for prayer and living this Christian life is? the Bible tells us.
YouTube - 2.1 Deconversion: Prayer
I am very surprised that I have read that many apostates and atheists find these arguments good. The main problem with his arguments it makes me wonder if he understood what the Assemblies of God teach about prayer. Like him I grew up thinking that prayer was as he initially defined it. But like him I was a child at the time. Also like him, I also came to the conclusion that we much pray according to God's will. But there is several differences between what the Assemblies of God teaches and what you he has has presented.
1. God's will isn't subjective. If you want to know God's plan for your life and your purpose, you can know it. One way to know is to see if what you think God's will is lines up with the Bible. If it does not then you know it's you who is wrong.
2. Why would God grant the selfish prayers we pray? If the point of prayer is for us to commune with God and to draw closer to God, then why would God give us superpowers or make us a robot or and flight of fancy we might imagine? How would that help us? It wouldn't. Thankfully he seemed to have realized that.
3. God does not want us to just pray for things that might happen anyway. I learned that God does supply our needs. Sometimes not the way we expect but what is best.
4. I also notice that people just amaze me when they talk about prayer. Can this guy really say all the time in Church he never experienced nor ever seen God move miraculously and intervene in his life or anyone he knows? Has he never seen the peace of God manifested in the life of one whom has not natural reason to be peace of mind? I've seen God bless and help me and those I know in ways that defy description or understanding. Just for starters. One of my first cousins was murdered 5 years ago and my aunt blesses and praises God (as we all do) for keeping her and comforting her. I know people God healed of cancer after medical science gave up on them. I myself was healed of juvenile arthritis. Our church mother was hit by a hummer 3 years ago and was told she would never fully recover, but she has. I could go on and on. All of these things build a relationship with God founded on the fact that God shows us that no matter what happens we can trust God.
5. That's the number one thing I hear missing from the stories ex-Christians tell: a relationship. Where God talks and they listen.
I've spent some time thinking about apostasy. The Bible talks about becoming a Christian from the point of view of a complete change. The Bible uses the same language as in a caterpillar turning into a butterfly. Once a caterpillar becomes a butterfly the animal can never turn back into a caterpillar. Same thing is true of a born-again Christian.
Romans 12:2 says
2Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
The word translated "transformed" is "Metamorphoo" and we get the word "metamorphosis" from it. You can't undo this once God starts this process. This is also how we know that the will of God is.
One last thing: How do we know that the purpose is for prayer and living this Christian life is? the Bible tells us.
Why would I not serve a God I can trust?
28And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. 29For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. - Romans 8:28-29
YouTube - 2.1 Deconversion: Prayer
Related articles by Zemanta
- Creating a Prayer Space for Moms (momblognetwork.com)
Truthbomb Apologetics: The Bayside Apologetics Conference
I really appreciate Chad for posting this announcement I think I can make this one.

Truthbomb Apologetics: The Bayside Apologetics Conference
For those of you who live on the West Coast, you may be interested in the forthcoming Bayside Apologetics Conference taking place on August 27th and 28th at Bayside Church in Roseville, CA.
Featured Biola University speakers will be Dr. J.P. Moreland and Dr. William Lane Craig.
To register, see here.
For more information on the event see here or here.
Many thanks to "Apologetics Guy" Mikel Del Rosario for the heads-up about this event!
Courage and Godspeed,
Chad
Truthbomb Apologetics: The Bayside Apologetics Conference
Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Bloom Where Your Planted: How to Get into Apologetics Ministry by Greg Koukl
I really appreciate, Chad from Truthbomb Apologetics for posting this video of Greg Koukl giving advice on how to get into Apologetics Ministry. This is a great video.
Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Bloom Where Your Planted: How to Get into Apologetics Ministry by Greg Koukl
Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Bloom Where Your Planted: How to Get into Apologetics Ministry by Greg Koukl
Labels:
Apologetics,
Chad,
Christianity,
Greg Koukl,
Theology
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Science
Brian Auten has posted another wonderful quote on Apologetics 315.
Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Science
"All science, even the divine science, is a sublime detective story. Only it is not set to detect why a man is dead; but the darker secret of why he is alive."I think that Chesterton hit the nail on the head.
- G.K. Chesterton (The Thing. CW. III 191)
Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Science
Labels:
Apologetics,
Christianity,
GK Chesterton,
God,
QUOTES,
science
Can we be good, moral without God? | True Freethinker
Mariano posted videos with William Lane Craig and John Lennox responding to questions of if it makes sense to talk of morality without God.
Can we be good, moral without God? | True Freethinker
Can we be good, moral without God? | True Freethinker
Saturday, July 10, 2010
The Dunamis Word: Christian Civility...With Gentleness & Respect?
Here is a great post from Pastor Elder Burnett. All I can say is Amen! Amen!!!
The Dunamis Word: Christian Civility...With Gentleness & Respect?
The Dunamis Word: Christian Civility...With Gentleness & Respect?
Please Make A Note: How Euler Derived the Momentum Equations
I found this great post explaining a great derivation important for Physics and Mechanical Engineering.
Please Make A Note: How Euler Derived the Momentum Equations
In this post, I will present Euler's derivation of the momentum balance equations for a fluid flow. Please note that I will use modern notation with a few modifications to the original derivation to clarify certain issues. Nonetheless, the core of Euler's derivation is maintained.
Please Make A Note: How Euler Derived the Momentum Equations
Answering Muslims: ABC Report on Our Arrests
This is a video report of the incident of Christians being arrested at an Arab Festival in Dearborn, Michigan.
Answering Muslims: ABC Report on Our Arrests
Answering Muslims: ABC Report on Our Arrests
Labels:
Arab Festival,
Christianity,
David Wood,
Dearborn,
Islam,
Muslim
THE APOLOGETIC FRONT: Debates by Stephen Meyer
Here is an excellent post by Mike Felker listing debate by Stephen Meyer. Meyer is an excellent scientist, writer, and debater. I thoroughly enjoy his work on Intelligent Design. I'd like to see him debate Richard Dawkins. (I can dream can't I? By some miracle, Dawkins might evolve and grow a proverbial backbone.) . I'm glad Mike posted this list. Please follow the link to see it.
THE APOLOGETIC FRONT: Debates by Stephen Meyer
THE APOLOGETIC FRONT: Debates by Stephen Meyer
Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer? « Biola Magazine
This is an awesome Interview
The thing that amazes me about the people who hate intelligent design is that they expect us to believe that all of nature in its myriad of complexities, structure, and shape - awesome as it is - came into being without a mind behind it. I'm a computer programmer and no computer program comes into existence without a mind. Why would DNA or anything we see in nature be any different?
Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer? « Biola Magazine
In the growing movement known as intelligent design, Stephen Meyer is an emerging figurehead. A young, Cambridge-educated philosopher of science, Meyer is director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute — intelligent design’s primary intellectual and scientific headquarters. He’s also author of Signature in the Cell, a provocative new book that offers the first comprehensive DNA-based argument for intelligent design.I highly suggest reading the article but also I find the comments very telling. There are several comments made by people who embrace evolution form an atheistic worldview. Their attitude amazes me. It's like Evolution has to be so fundamentally true that only morons don't believe it or question it. At the same time they take the attitude that theists are biased because scientists are supposed to "question and test everything". It's also amazing that none of the critical comments I says said anything like "I read Meyer's book and he is wrong on a certain page and here is why." No, he's wrong because he challenges their worldview.
On May 14, Meyer gave a lecture at an event hosted by Biola's Christian apologetics program in Chase Gymnasium, where he made his case that the origin of the information needed to create the first cell must have came from an intelligent designer. Biola Magazine sat down with Meyer while he was at Biola and asked him to elaborate on evolution, the scientific merit of the theory of intelligent design and the uncanny similarities between DNA and computer programming.
The thing that amazes me about the people who hate intelligent design is that they expect us to believe that all of nature in its myriad of complexities, structure, and shape - awesome as it is - came into being without a mind behind it. I'm a computer programmer and no computer program comes into existence without a mind. Why would DNA or anything we see in nature be any different?
Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer? « Biola Magazine
New Atheist in the Park — by Backwoods Boom Town Productions | True Freethinker
Mariano has posted an interesting comic strip that I can really relate to. It's about an obnoxious atheist railing against a person reading the Bible alone in the park. IT is hilarious because almost every single argument I have ever heard atheists make, were used in this strip! The atheist would not let the Christian get a single word in. I realize that many atheist would bristle at this because they don't think their personal attitudes nor the ones that they know are this closed minded or obnoxious. Let's be frank. We all have to admit that we know closed-minded obnoxious people who are atheists and we know some who are Christians. Bottom line. However, this strip is worthwhile because you can see how accusatory some atheist arguments are and how some people are not interested in dialogue but drama with no substance to back up their viewpoint. I also think the art is fantastic. I sure hope Backwoods Boom Town Productions releases more.



New Atheist in the Park — by Backwoods Boom Town Productions | True Freethinker
New Atheist in the Park — by Backwoods Boom Town Productions | True Freethinker
Historical Jesus | True Freethinker
Historical Jesus | True Freethinker
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















