Sunday, April 19, 2009

Is America A Christian Nation?


I came across this video on YouTube that I must not let pass by without comment. The video was posted by well-meaning individual to support Barack Obama against Fox News. I thought Fox would clean up its act and stop making clumsy and stupid attacks against Obamas but no dice. "Fair and Balanced"? Must be some form of sarcasm that I missed! This particular news cast was obviously to call into question Obama's commitment to Christianity. To arouse the anger of Christians in America. I think the video is correct in calling Fox into question but we can't throw the whole argument "under the Bus". What does it mean to be a "Christian" nation? This is what we must ask.

Let's give Obama the benefit of the doubt. Let's assume that he's not the anti-Christ bent on world domination and casting off all religions and uniting all of humanity in worshipping him. I think the majority of "Christians"...even the racist ones...have to concede that we don't have enough info to make such accusations. Okay, given that I have to side with the video author in interpreting Obama's words as saying that America is not backing any one particular religion because we have "separation of church and state." On the surface many Americans embrace this rhetoric as a good thing! But as a Christian...your religion isn't just something you do on Sunday/Saturday...it's a life-long, 24 hour, committed lifestyle! If you truly believe that the Bible is the Word of God and you line up your life with it, how can you say that your nation is a Christian nation. Take a look at the video.





As for actually answering the question: Is the United States A Christian Nation? If you define a "Christian Nation" as one that follows the Bible and seeks to be a model of Jesus' kingdom on earth, then I would have to answer "No" and go as far as saying it never really was. Can we call a nation that legalizes abortion and is on the cusp of legalizing homosexual marriages following God's will? Not to mention all the other evil sins our nation does and has done. And don't forget that when John Adams was President slavery was legal. When he said that the US was not founded on a particular religion he was right. Adams was a Mason and Deist. Remember a deist is someone who believes that there is a God who created everything and set reality in motion but no longer intervenes or interact with what was created. Some Deists even go as far as saying that God is not even a personal being but more like an impersonal not-being - just a force with no thought or feeling. This is almost about as far from Judaism, Christianity, and Islamic as you get!

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 10 of 14

Mariano, has published his 10th refutation of Dan Barker in his 14-part series. This time the topic is about whether or not Jesus advocated that his follower castrate themselves to worship and glorify him. I know...I know, Barker is deluded but he must be answered. Mariano does an excellent job!!! Read his post.

Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 10 of 14

James White Comments on the D'Souza vs Barker Debate


On the 04-16-09 webcast of the Dividing Line, Dr. James White commented on the debate between Dinesh D'Souza and Dan Barker. I've posted on it before but I feel the need to talk about it again because seeing it through Dr. White's viewpoint I got to think about it differently. I still don't think that D'Souza did badly in the debate, but White's criticisms are also valid. At first I thought D'Souza's plan of attack - to argue against Barker without defending the Bible but to win on Barker's terms using only philosophy, science, and history. I see now how he failed to be most effective because Barker attacked the Bible. Dr. White is preparing for his upcoming debate against Dan Barker so of course he is thinking about the larger issue: How do you defend the faith against people who don't believe. A lot of Christians take the viewpoint that you can't use the Bible to witness or as an affective defense of the Bible if the people you are dialouging with refuse to acknowlege the Bibe as the Word of God. Dr. White takes a different view: defend the Bible, explain the Bible, stand on the Bible. I would further argue that this is the methods the Apostles used themselves. I have two examples: in Acts 2:14-41 - Peter's first sermon - all Peter used to prove his point was the Old Testament scriptures and he appealed to their own experiences. Remember Jesus had been crucified some 40 days prior and many, if not all, of his hearers had eyewitness knowledge of everything Peter was preaching. My other example is Acts 17 when Paul was in Athens on Mars Hill. What did Paul use? He used some philosophy and with the bulk of arguments based on scripture. The audience was different - people who likely had no idea what the Old Testament said. This shows me that we have tailor or preaching and teaching to our audiences. Dr. James White's comments are well-worth review. Here is the web cast: Dividing line 04-16-09.

Here is the full debate between D'Souza and Barker.
What had happen' was.....: D'Souza vs Barker: Christianity Vs Atheism

Friday, April 17, 2009

Vox Veritatis: The Impossibility of God Part 1

Here is a great post written on the Vox Veritatis blog that refutes the stupid argument against God by trying to prove that the Bible gives contradictory descriptions of God's nature. The article does a good job of showing how silly that really is. Take a look!

Vox Veritatis: The Impossibility of God Part 1 - Prolegomena

Rhoblogy: The EvilBible.com Project, Part 1 - Murder in the Bible

Today on the blog Rhoblogy, in contributing to Mariano's idea of we cohesively tackle the same subjects, a post has appeared discussing how Murder is discussed in the Bible. The author did a great job knocking down the ideas about murder given to evilbible.com and I think the response is well-written and a must-read. The only thing I would add, and it may be covered in a future part of his series is the question of does the Bible say "You will not kill." or does it say "You will not murder." in Exodus 20:13. We see in Ecclesiastes 3:3 says:

a time to kill and a time to heal,
a time to tear down and a time to build,

The King James Version uses "kill" in both Exodus 20:13 and Ecclesiastes 3:3, but more modern translations like the NIV use "murder" in Exodus 20:13 and "kill" in Ecclesiastes 3:3. They are not the same words, this is why this is important the word in Exodus 20:13 is "Ratsach" which means "murder" but in Ecclesiastes 3:3 the word is "harag" which is a different word. It makes sense given that "murder" and "killing" are not equivalent. For example, killing someone who breaks into your hows to kill your family is not murder but it is killing. However if you planned to find an opportunity to stab someone when no one is looking to kill him or her - that's murder. Killing enemy soldiers who are trying to kill you in a war is not murder. The difference is intent - the reason behind the action.

Here is the link to the article:
Rhoblogy: The EvilBible.com Project, Part 1 - Murder in the Bible

The Bible & Rape


Today on his blog at Atheism Is Dead Mariano is going to cover the faulty assertion that the Bible condones and advocates rape. Whenever I hear some stupid idea such as that I wonder what orifice the writer pulled such an idea out of. In keeping with Mariano's theme I will be looking at one particular case concerning rape from the Bible found in Judges chapters 19-21. The story is very horrific a man allows a group of men to rape and murder his concubine to save his own life. The Bible only reports that this happened...in no way does God or anyone condone the act. As a matter-of-fact it leads to a civil war among the Israelites. I challenge anyone to find a verse that prescribes that this is what we should do. I'm even referring to the Levite announcing the crime by cutting his dead concubine up into 12 pieces and sending one to each of the tribes of Israel's territory. God did not tell him to do that. Based on what the rest of the Bible says I can't find anything that tells us it's good, God glorifying behavior. I'm also referring to the way the rest of Israel allowed surviving Benjamites to take wives. God did not tell them to do that! All the nation was outraged by the crime and the aftermath. Why report the story? The story underscores the cultural reality of the time summed up in Judges 21:25 which says:
In those days Israel had no king; everyone did as he saw fit.

This is scary and sums up the state of our own country. When a society is left to itself and does not respect God, this is what you get.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 9 of 14

Here is Mariano's 9th part to his scriptural refutations of Dan Barker's stupid claims. This one deals with the lie that Jesus taught that we should ignore and hate our parents. Thanks to this article I learned the term for this is called"Filial Misanthropy" There is no Biblical leg to stand on this issue to substantiate that it is a God-sanctioned practice. Check out the article.

Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 9 of 14

Personality Tests

When I used to do Network Marketing I learned about one way sales people learn how to interact with people is be able to recognize different personality types in yourself and others. It turns out that there are 4 types of personalities that have been identified. When I was first exposed to this information, it was presented as if each person fits in one type. However today, the conventional viewpoint is that we are all combinations of each type with one or two types dominantly affecting how we think and behave. Each of the four types have been called by different names. For the purposes of this post I will list them and the corresponding order matches for each trait or temperment. I also will provide links for more information and who came up with the identifications.

Famous Greek physician Hippocrates who lived from 460 until 377 B.C.

choleric

The choleric can be considered to be highly excitable: this person’s emotions are very easily aroused. This person is vehement in speech and action and his/her movements are carried out swiftly. He/she is bold and ambitious but tends to be incautious.

sanguine

Has a tendency towards excitement, whereas the phlegmatic have a tendency towards inhibition. The sanguine person is stable, yet active. He/she is courageous, hopeful, amorous and cheerful, but somewhat inconstant. He/she is courteous, lively, alert, and demonstrative.

phlegmatic

Stable and calm. He/she may even look cool, sluggish or apathetic. Normally quiet and reserved, he/she does not easily become friendly or antagonistic.

melancholic

Can be seen as the opposite of the choleric because this person is highly inhibited. The melancholic person is characterized by slowness of thought and a tendency to be depressed. The melancholic has difficulty making friends, but he/she is reliable because constancy and determination are the other traits.


Here is an online personality test based on this idea.

Myers and Briggs


In 1958, Isabel Myers and her mother Katheryn Briggs wrote a paper titled Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI for short), in which they proposed that there are actually sixteen different human personality types.

Ms. Myers had been reading various obscure psychology textbooks when she stumbled across Psychological Types. Being intelligent and perceptive, she immediately realized that here was a masterpiece of psychological thought, written by one of the greatest geniuses in human history. She read the book cover to cover, and thought long about how to expand Jung's ideas into a complete model of human personality.

Ms. Myers came to realize three things:

  1. That everyone chooses not only a first-choice or "Primary" function, but also a second-choice or "auxiliary" function.
  2. That if the primary function is judgmental, then the auxiliary function will be perceptive, and vice versa.
  3. That if the primary function is introverted, then the auxiliary function will be extraverted, and vice versa.

In this system, then, a person

has 2 choices for orientation, introvert (I) or extravert (E); two choices for method of information intake, sensing (S) or intuition (N); two choices for method of judgment, thinking (T) or feeling (F); and two choices as to which function is used in the outer world, judgment (J) or perception (P). Hence there are 2x2x2x2=16 different MBTI personality types, as shown in this chart:

ISFJ ISTJ INFJ INTJ
ISFP ISTP INFP INTP
ESFJ ESTJ ENFJ ENTJ
ESFP ESTP ENFP ENTP

Tests were created to help determine which of the sixteen types the test taker was, and after a time, when many people had taken these MBTI tests, personality "profiles" (correspondences between MBTI type and the personalities of individual people) emerged. When one examines these profiles and compares them with the "temperaments" of Hippocrates, a clear correspondence emerges:

  • SJ = Guardians
  • SP = Artisans
  • NF = Idealists
  • NT = Rationalists
Human Metrics is a website for take a test that scores you using these ideas.

True Colors by Don Lowry - 1978

Red

The Red color personalities make up 15 percent of the population and are very direct, totally self-contained and will not let you see their weaknesses. They are extremely focused, are very intense and like to get straight to the point. They must be in charge at all times and are totally motivated by money and success.

They dislike indecision and have no time for chit chat about family or relationships. When talking to a Red, it is important to stroke their ego, show them respect and let them believe they are in total control of the conversation at all times. Although they are very goal-oriented, they are short tempered, domineering, impatient and un-teachable.

Blue

Blues personalities are open and direct with their feelings and make up 15 percent of the population. Although th

ey make up a smaller percentage of the population, there are many Blues are drawn to network marketing because they are very fun-loving, high energy, extremely creative individuals. When you ask them a question, they will go on and on, giving you more information than you needed, and in the process probably forgetting what the question was to begin with.

Their weaknesses are that they tend to talk too much, are unorganized and are poor with follow-up (one of the best things you can do for a Blue is to teach them to use an auto-responder). But if you can train them to focus and to follow a system for success you will have one of the hardest working and resourceful team members you could ask for.

Yellow

Yellow personalities are open yet indirect with their feelings and make up 35 percent of the population. They are dependable, great listeners, exceptional team players, and are and supportive and nurturing. They are the best at using both sides of their brain. Key words to use when communicating with a Yellow are "team", "together", "relationship" and "family." They are very open with their feelings, but when you ask them a question they don’t volunteer any more information than is required. They enjoy life and hate pushy people or any kind of confrontation.

Their weaknesses are that they are overly sensitive, take things personally, tend to be followers and are not goal-oriented. However, if you take your time and build a strong relationship with them, teach them, and help them, you’ll have a remarkable and very loyal team member that "plays well with others."

Green

Green personalities make up 35 percent of the population. They are indirect, self-contained, and very pragmatic and logical. They rely on the confirmation of facts and figures before any decision can be made or any action can be taken. They are extremely organized, very good planners and are always accurate, persistent and great on follow-through.

They might, however, sometimes be perceived as being depressed and lonely. They tend to be over-analytical and hard to please, making them slow to begin any project until they have all the information required and it has been graphed, analyzed, dissected and scrutinized to their satisfaction. They hate pushy sales people and need to be allowed to sell themselves on your MLM business opportunity. After they do, their expertise and attention to detail will make them invaluable members of your network marketing team.

The above website even make an equivalence:

Equivalents for the 4 Personality Types

  • Hippocrates (370 BC): Choleric, Sanguine, Phlegmatic,Melancholy
  • Plato (340 BC): Guardian, Artisan, Philosopher, Scientist
  • Kretschner (1920): Melancholic, Hypomanic, Anesthetic, Hyperasthetic
  • Sprangler (1930): Religious, Aesthetic, Theoretic, Economic
  • Fromm (1947): Hoarding, Exploiting, Receptive, Marketing
  • Psycho-Geometrics (1978): Triangle, Squiggle, Circle, Square
  • D.E.S.A.: Dominant, Expressive, Solid, Analytical
  • LEAD Test: Leader, Expressor, Dependable, Analyst
  • ARRAY (Knaupp): Production, Connection, Status Quo, Harmony
  • PSI: Controller, Promoter, Supporter, Analyst
  • Gary Smalley: Lion, Otter, Golden Retriever, Beaver
  • Biblical Characters: Paul, Peter, Abraham, Moses
  • Children's Literature: Rabbit, Tigger, Pooh, Eeyore
  • Charlie Brown Characters: Lucy, Snoopy, Charlie Brown, Linus
I've recently learned about another way to look at these types. It's from the Laugh Your Way to A Better Marriage ministry by Pastor Mark Gungor. He worked with Larry Bilotta on an online test. Each temperment is called countries: Perfect, Fun, Peace, and Control. What I like most about this test is that each trait is given a store so you can truly understand how much each trait fits you.


Here is the results of my Flag Test.

Movie Review: Fireproof


I recently had the opportunity of seeing the movie Fireproof. I liked it. I thought it was brilliant. Okay, I've got to come clean and admit that my lovely wife, Mitsouky, twisted my arm to watch it. I think everyone should see it because it has much to say about marriage that can be applied no matter how long you've been married or your race you can use the movie to help you think about your own marriage. The story is not just about how God can reconcile husband and wife back to each other but also how God reconciles people back to himself. The movie actually focuses on the husband's point of view but when I saw they related to one another I could see mistakes they were both making. It wasn't all him or all her cause their maritial problems. The movie points out a more fundamental fix: if God isn't part of your life and your marriage then you have set yourself up for failure. This was shown how the main character Caleb was only able to look past himself and love his wife only by loving God first. I don't want to give away all the story...you've got to see it. What I got most out of it was realizing that my role as husband does not depend on my wife and what she does. I should love her and value her no matter if she acts like she accepts it or not. I've heard that before but seeing really helped me understand it better.

My wife and I attended a seminar back in February called Laugh Your Way To A Better Marriage and it covers how to relate better to your spouse if you are both already Christians....really practical stuff. The movie does not give much in this area. The folks who made the movie did put together the Love Dare book that showed up in the movie. Here is a link to the main site for the web site.


Here is the movie's trailer

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Tax and Spend by Barack Obama

Apparently there are some Americans that are not happy with the change in Taxes. They are staging a demonstration kind of like the Boston Tea Party from the American Revolution. Here is what I found from YouTube:


Revolution is brewing... This April 15th go to your local tea party! There will be tea parties in over 500 cities! Find out where your cities tea party will be here: http://www.taxdayteaparty.com





Tax Facts

I found the perfect video to commemorate Tax day. Remember Jesus paid his taxes and we have to pay them too.



Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 8 of 14


Mariano has again written an masterful defense of what the Bible actually says instead of Dan Barker's imagination. This time Mariano shows how Barker's assertion that the Bible condones polygamy is wrong. He needs to go to the teachings of Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon church, for a mandate for polygamy.
Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 8 of 14

Public Apostasy

A video has been posted on YouTube as a public statement of apostasy, decrying the stance of the Roman Catholic Church against the use of condoms and "safe" sex teachings. The video attempts to be humorous. You be the judge.





The video offends my own sensibilities because although I don't think for a moment that Jesus is happy with an church denomination on every point, I do believe that Jesus wants us to use His word as the final authority for all we stand on, say, and do. Reality is what He says it is. The maker of this video, and those that think like him, think that we should do extra-marital sex is okay and anyone should be free to have sex with whomever they choose and how ever they choose. Therefore, to avoid diseases and "unwanted" pregnancies while we selfishly seek to fulfill our own carnal pleasures and desires, "safe" sexual practices is the only intelligent solution because "they're going to do it anyway...let's keep them safe". From my own point-of-view: fine. Why not, if that is what people want? Doesn't affect me. Do you know what the problem is: Our Lord. Our Master. Our Creator. The one who gives us life and sustains that life says no. As long as we keep disobeying Him and refuse to submit to God we will keep having problems as we watch our society slip into the toilet socially, economically, physically,and emotionally - as individuals, families, and nation.

Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 7 of 14

Mariano has again written another awesome post refuting Dan Barker. This time the discussion is about Barker's assertion of God allowing and condoning child sacrifice. Mariano did an awesome job talking about it. I agree with his points. The one thing that I think a little differently about is about Jephthah's story told in Judges 11:30-39. In my NIV Bible it does have aq footnote that says that Jephthah did not sacrifice his daughter as a burnt offering but dedicated her to God so she could not marry or have children. What I learned from Mariano is that a literal translation (Young's Literal Translation) of the Hebrew from Judges 11:40 could be:

And it was an ordinance in Israel that the daughters of Israel went from year to year to the daughter of Jephthah, that they might comfort her for four days in a year.

instead of how I'm used to reading it:

And it is a custom in Israel, that the daughters of Israel went yearly to tell again of the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite, four days in a year.

The Young's Literal Translation does seem to imply the thought that Jephthah's daughter did not die because it says that girls went to see her for four days every year. When I studies this, I looked at the words used (okay it was a lexicon, so it does not prove anything) and I could not find anything that made me think that it she did not die. Every other translation I could find says that the girls held a memorial for her every year.

Mariano even pointed out another point I had not considered:

Clearly, if we do not choose and pick but consider the greater context of the Torah we know that if it was a clean animal he would have offered it as a burnt-offering and if a human then they would be consecrated to the LORD.

I'm not sure where he got this from. I made comment on his blog to ask him about it and I'm sure he will get back to me soon. The truth is whether or not Jephthah sacrifice his daughter as a burnt offering has no bearing on Mariano's brilliant exegesis on why Barker is wrong. We got to face it. No where does God condone or prescribe for us to serve him by human sacrifice. That is why abortion is most-often an abominable evil. It's child sacrifice a foreign evil deity: our own selfish desires as people.


Atheism is Dead: Dan Barker - Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications, part 7 of 14

Monday, April 13, 2009

Going to be Busy The Next Few Days

Due to the fact that my wife will be going into labor very soon (think any second), I will not be able to do many new posts. We may Twitter from the hospital, but most likely not! WE're at home now but you know how quickly things can change. It's just a matter of waiting for now. Please pray for us.

History of Fighting Games

There is a great video on YouTube that is a short documentary on the history of Fighting video games. This is one of my favorite genres!



Laugh Your Way To A Better Marriage


Last February, my wife and I attended a Laugh Your Way To A Better Marriage seminar. It was great. Pastor Mark Gungar did a great job. He discusses about how men and women think differently about the same things. He talks about how to use and understand each other about personality differences. He talk about the key to great sex and how to stay married without killing each other. Seminars take place all over the nation and some of them are live and some of them are video based. In my area the next seminar is by video April 24, 2009 in Fairfield, CA.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

1 Corinthians 1:18-30 on a Tie!


Dr. James White is scheduled to debate Atheist Dan Barker at the end of April. This will be a great one. To commemorate his debates, Dr. White often creates neck ties with scripture written on it. Of course the scriptures are not in English but often in Greek if its from the New Testament. This particular tie has the text from 1 Corinthians 1:18-30 in Greek in uncial font. "Uncial" means that the text is written in all capital letters. On the left is a picture of the tie. I wish I could get one one day. I know, I know. I don't read Greek, but I would like to learn.Click on the link to see the whole tie better. Here is the text (from the NIV).

For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

For it is written:
"I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate."

Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe. Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength.

Brothers, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. He chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are, so that no one may boast before him. It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Was Anyone Saved at the Cross?


Dr. James White has written a blog post where he posts a link to a previous article he wrote defending the reformed understanding of Jesus' atonement for our sins when he went to the cross. You can read the post called: Was Anyone Saved at the Cross?

I really like this article. Dr. White wrote that at one point that he was a "Four-Point" Calvinist. He struggled with the concept of the "Limited Atonement" just as I do. He talks about how he had come to accept all five points of Calvinism. As always he offers solid explanation of Bible verses. One Bible verse that I wish he had expounded on is 1 Timothy 4:9-11 which says:

This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance (and for this we labor and strive), that we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe.

Command and teach these things.

This was one of the scriptures that those who argue against Calvinism use. I have not heard the reformed interpretation of this particular scripture. I think I'll call in to James White's web cast one day to ask.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

This Is Why We must Watch And Pray


Being the father of a little girl myself, in the same region of the United States where this story took place, I had to comment. Did you hear? A little girl 8 year-old went missing last March 27, and then found April 6 in an irrigation pond in a suit case! This happened in Tracy, CA. I have cousins and an aunt who live in Tracy, CA. I was like who could do such an evil thing. They arrested a Sunday School Teacher!!!!! A woman!!!! What is happening?! We still don't know if she really did it, and if she did what was her motive? The world is loosing its mind more and more...slipping into oblivion. Well, Jesus said that there would be days like these. Jesus is the only cure. Read the article: Missing Girl Sandra Cantu.