Monday, July 12, 2010

YouTube - 2.1 Deconversion: Prayer

Here is another post in my series answering Evid3nc3's Youtube videos discussing why he walked away from Christianity. It's been a while so in case you didn't see the other posts or Evid3nc3's series let me just say that this is a great series of videos describing the process that one man underwent in leaving Christianity. In the following video, he discusses why prayer led him away from God.




I am very surprised that I have read that many apostates and atheists find these arguments good. The main problem with his arguments it makes me wonder if he understood what the Assemblies of God teach about prayer. Like him I grew up thinking that prayer was as he initially defined it. But like him I was a child at the time. Also like him, I also came to the conclusion that we much pray according to God's will. But there is several differences between what the Assemblies of God teaches and what you he has has presented.

1. God's will isn't subjective. If you want to know God's plan for your life and your purpose, you can know it. One way to know is to see if what you think God's will is lines up with the Bible. If it does not then you know it's you who is wrong.
2. Why would God grant the selfish prayers we pray? If the point of prayer is for us to commune with God and to draw closer to God, then why would God give us superpowers or make us a robot or and flight of fancy we might imagine? How would that help us? It wouldn't. Thankfully he seemed to have realized that.
3. God does not want us to just pray for things that might happen anyway. I learned that God does supply our needs.  Sometimes not the way we expect but what is best.
4. I also notice  that people just amaze me when they talk about prayer. Can this guy really say all the time in Church he never experienced nor ever seen God move miraculously and intervene in his life or anyone he knows? Has he never seen the peace of God manifested in the life of one whom has not natural reason to be peace of mind? I've seen God bless and help me and those I know in ways that defy description or understanding. Just for starters. One of my first cousins was murdered 5 years ago and my aunt blesses and praises God (as we all do) for keeping her and comforting her. I know people God healed of cancer after medical science gave up on them. I myself was healed of juvenile arthritis. Our church mother was hit by a hummer 3 years ago and was told she would never fully recover, but she has. I could go on and on. All of these things build a relationship with God founded on the fact that God shows us that no matter what happens we can trust God.
5. That's the number one thing I hear missing from the stories ex-Christians tell: a relationship. Where God talks and they listen.

I've spent some time thinking about apostasy. The Bible talks about becoming a Christian from the point of view of a complete change. The Bible uses the same language as in a caterpillar turning into a butterfly. Once a caterpillar becomes a butterfly the animal can never turn back into a caterpillar. Same thing is true of a born-again Christian.

Romans 12:2 says
2Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

The word translated "transformed" is "Metamorphoo" and we get the word "metamorphosis" from it.  You can't undo this once God starts this process. This is also how we know that the will of God is. 


One last thing: How do we know that the purpose is for prayer and living this Christian life is? the Bible tells us.


28And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. 29For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. - Romans 8:28-29
Why would I not serve a God I can trust?

YouTube - 2.1 Deconversion: Prayer
Enhanced by Zemanta

Leviticus 16: Day of Atonement




Leviticus 16: Day of Atonement
Enhanced by Zemanta

Truthbomb Apologetics: The Bayside Apologetics Conference

I really appreciate Chad for posting this announcement I think I can make this one.


For those of you who live on the West Coast, you may be interested in the forthcoming Bayside Apologetics Conference taking place on August 27th and 28th at Bayside Church in Roseville, CA.

Featured Biola University speakers will be Dr. J.P. Moreland and Dr. William Lane Craig.

To register, see here.

For more information on the event see here or here.

Many thanks to "Apologetics Guy" Mikel Del Rosario for the heads-up about this event!

Courage and Godspeed,
Chad

Truthbomb Apologetics: The Bayside Apologetics Conference
Enhanced by Zemanta

Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Bloom Where Your Planted: How to Get into Apologetics Ministry by Greg Koukl

I really appreciate, Chad from Truthbomb Apologetics for  posting this video of Greg Koukl giving advice on how to get into Apologetics Ministry. This is a great video.









Truthbomb Apologetics: Video: Bloom Where Your Planted: How to Get into Apologetics Ministry by Greg Koukl
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Science

Brian Auten has posted another wonderful quote on Apologetics 315.
"All science, even the divine science, is a sublime detective story. Only it is not set to detect why a man is dead; but the darker secret of why he is alive."

- G.K. Chesterton (The Thing. CW. III 191)
 I think that Chesterton hit the nail on the head.

Apologetics 315: Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Science
Enhanced by Zemanta

Can we be good, moral without God? | True Freethinker

Mariano posted videos with William Lane Craig and John Lennox responding to questions of if it makes sense to talk of morality without God.









Can we be good, moral without God? | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, July 10, 2010

The Dunamis Word: Christian Civility...With Gentleness & Respect?

Here is a great post from Pastor Elder Burnett. All I can say is Amen! Amen!!!

The Dunamis Word: Christian Civility...With Gentleness & Respect?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Please Make A Note: How Euler Derived the Momentum Equations

I found this great post explaining a great derivation important for Physics and Mechanical Engineering.

In this post, I will present Euler's derivation of the momentum balance equations for a fluid flow. Please note that I will use modern notation with a few modifications to the original derivation to clarify certain issues. Nonetheless, the core of Euler's derivation is maintained.


Please Make A Note: How Euler Derived the Momentum Equations
Enhanced by Zemanta

Answering Muslims: ABC Report on Our Arrests

This is a video report of the incident of Christians being arrested at an Arab Festival in Dearborn, Michigan.




Answering Muslims: ABC Report on Our Arrests

THE APOLOGETIC FRONT: Debates by Stephen Meyer

Here is an excellent post by Mike Felker listing debate by Stephen Meyer. Meyer is an excellent scientist, writer, and debater. I thoroughly enjoy his work on Intelligent Design. I'd like to see him debate Richard Dawkins. (I can dream can't I? By some miracle, Dawkins might evolve and grow a proverbial backbone.) . I'm glad Mike posted this list. Please follow the link to see it.

THE APOLOGETIC FRONT: Debates by Stephen Meyer
Enhanced by Zemanta

Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer? « Biola Magazine

This is an awesome Interview

In the growing movement known as intelligent design, Stephen Meyer is an emerging figurehead. A young, Cambridge-educated philosopher of science, Meyer is director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute — intelligent design’s primary intellectual and scientific headquarters. He’s also author of Signature in the Cell, a provocative new book that offers the first comprehensive DNA-based argument for intelligent design.
On May 14, Meyer gave a lecture at an event hosted by Biola's Christian apologetics program in Chase Gymnasium, where he made his case that the origin of the information needed to create the first cell must have came from an intelligent designer. Biola Magazine sat down with Meyer while he was at Biola and asked him to elaborate on evolution, the scientific merit of the theory of intelligent design and the uncanny similarities between DNA and computer programming.
I highly suggest reading the article but also I find the comments very telling. There are several comments made by people who embrace evolution form an atheistic worldview. Their attitude amazes me. It's like Evolution has to be so fundamentally true that only morons don't believe it or question it. At the same time they take the attitude that theists are biased  because scientists are supposed to "question and test everything". It's also amazing that none of the critical comments I says said anything like "I read Meyer's book and he is wrong on  a certain page and here is why."  No, he's wrong because he challenges their worldview.

The thing that amazes me about the people who hate intelligent design is that they expect us to believe that all of  nature in its myriad of complexities, structure, and shape - awesome as it is - came into being without a mind behind it. I'm a computer programmer and no computer program comes into existence without a mind. Why would DNA or anything we see in nature be any different?

Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer? « Biola Magazine
Enhanced by Zemanta

New Atheist in the Park — by Backwoods Boom Town Productions | True Freethinker

Mariano has posted an interesting comic strip that  I can really relate to. It's about an obnoxious atheist railing against a person reading the Bible alone in the park. IT is hilarious because almost every single argument I have ever heard atheists make, were used in this strip! The atheist would not let the Christian get a single word in. I realize that many atheist would bristle at this because they don't think their personal attitudes nor the ones that they know are this closed minded or obnoxious. Let's be frank. We all have to admit that we know closed-minded obnoxious people who are atheists and we know some who are Christians. Bottom line. However, this strip is worthwhile  because you can see how accusatory some atheist arguments are and how some people are not interested in dialogue but drama with no substance to back up their viewpoint. I also think the art is fantastic. I sure hope Backwoods Boom Town Productions releases more.
atheism, atheist, true freethinker, backwoods boomtown,1.jpg



atheism, atheist, true freethinker, backwoods boomtown, 2.jpg



atheism, atheist, true freethinker, backwoods boomtown, 3.jpg


New Atheist in the Park — by Backwoods Boom Town Productions | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Historical Jesus | True Freethinker

JesusImage via Wikipedia
Mariano, has pointed out another great video featuring William Lane Craig. This time discussing the Historicity of Jesus.




Historical Jesus | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 9, 2010

Apologetics 315: 200+ Apologetics Videos by AllAboutGod.com

Brian has posted a link to a site that hosts more than 200 videos in which questions about the Bible and Christianity are answered. It is called AllAboutGod.com It's a good resource and worth checking out. I'm real glad he called attention to it.

Apologetics 315: 200+ Apologetics Videos by AllAboutGod.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Truthbomb Apologetics: Resource: Got Questions?- The Bible has Answers, We'll Find Them for You!

Chad has posted a link to a resource on his blog that I can see bears further investigation.


gotquestions.org is a great site that offers answers to 231, 134 Bible questions and the list continues to grow!
This looks like this site will be a great resource for anyone who has questions regarding Christianity. One problem for many people who are raised in church is that when they had questions as children they were told to shut up instead of getting answers. Sites like this helps people to understand that there are answers to questions that they thought had no answer.

Truthbomb Apologetics: Resource: Got Questions?- The Bible has Answers, We'll Find Them for You!
Enhanced by Zemanta

On Jesus and Mythology and Shattering the Christ Myth | True Freethinker

Mariano has pointed to a trio of videos recording an interview with JP Holding regarding the myth that Christian beliefs are borrowed (stolen) from pagan and mystery religions. Holding is an expert in this area. He has written much in this area.

"Shattering the Christ Myth." Guest J.P. Holding, President of Tekton Apologetics (http://tektonics.org). Author refutes arguments Jesus Christ never existed. Copy cat & silence theses, Mithra, Osiris and Horus.












On Jesus and Mythology and Shattering the Christ Myth | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Who created the creator? Who created God?, etc. | True Freethinker

John LennoxImage by Medienmagazin pro via Flickr
I like this video Mariano pointed out on his blog. I like it because it is interesting to see how John Lennox would answer this question: Who created the creator?




Who created the creator? Who created God?, etc. | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Hank Hanegraaff - Questioning the Question

Hank Hanegraaff recently posted a great article discussing that many times skeptics ask Christians the wrong questions. He wrote:

In Proverbs 26 Solomon tells us that we are not to answer a fool according to his folly, or we’ll make fools of ourselves. On the other hand, Solomon continues, answer a fool according to his folly, or the fool will think he is wise in his own eyes (vv.4–5)—he’ll think he has uncovered some wisdom. We often find this sort of thing with questions that are raised in order to denigrate the notion of an eternal Being, an Intelligent Designer, or an uncaused first Cause.


He gives an example of such a question:

One of those questions is “Can God create a rock so heavy that he can’t move it?” That question is a classic straw man that has most Christians looking like the proverbial deer in the headlights. At best, the question challenges God’s omnipotence; at worst, it undermines His existence.

At the very outset, however, we should recognize a problem with the premise of the question. While it is true that God can do anything that is consistent with His nature, it’s absurd to suggest that He can do just anything. God can’t lie (Hebrews 6:18). God can’t be tempted (James 1:13). God can’t cease to exist (Psalm 102:25–27).


Hanegraaff brings up the point that often times when trying to prove a logical inconsistencies about God's existence people make logically inconsistent arguments.

Hank Hanegraaff - Questioning the Question

“It Cannot be Scientific to Include God…” | True Freethinker

Thanks to Mariano for pointing out the following video.






“It Cannot be Scientific to Include God…” | True Freethinker
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Brennon's Thoughts: See, I Can Change My Mind; or Accepting Molinism

My brother-in-Christ, Brennon, recently posted an article on his blog about why he is now accepting Molinism. I still have a great deal of problems with this attempt at reconciling Human Free Will with God's Sovereign Will and decrees. Brennon wrote:

So, with this in mind, it is easy to see how God could very easily providentially guide creation to His ends and still deal with free creatures. Take, for instance, the crucifixion. Peter says in Acts that Jesus was "delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death" (Acts 2:23). Well we know that God Himself didn't cause the pharisees to be godless. Rather, God knew what kind of godless men the pharisees would be, and He knew that if they were put in the position they were in, they would act to murder Jesus. Thereby, God was able to decree that Christ would be crucified to accomplish His justice, and was able to use the freely chosen sinful actions of evil men to accomplish this.

My problem with example is the full credit is given to God for Jesus' sacrifice - including the suffering not just the glorious ending.

Yet it was the LORD's will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the LORD makes his life a guilt offering, he will see his offspring and prolong his days, and the will of the LORD will prosper in his hand. - Isaiah 53:10
Another important verse is regarding Judas. Jesus knew Judas was a goner when Jesus selected him.

12While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled. - John 17:12
Given these facts and others. I am unable to understand how we can infer that God decrees outcomes without also having a hand in ordaining means. Let me be clear, I'm not saying that God forces or tempts anyone to do evil. God does allow people to do evil things and uses the outcome to get good out of it. Jesus' crucifixion is indeed of an example that God does take the evil that men desire to do and turns it to ultimate good. However there are times when God does stop people from sinning. This is where Middle Knowledge (Molinism) falls apart. God tells us that at times what man means for evil, God means for good.

15 When Joseph's brothers saw that their father was dead, they said, "What if Joseph holds a grudge against us and pays us back for all the wrongs we did to him?" 16 So they sent word to Joseph, saying, "Your father left these instructions before he died: 17 'This is what you are to say to Joseph: I ask you to forgive your brothers the sins and the wrongs they committed in treating you so badly.' Now please forgive the sins of the servants of the God of your father." When their message came to him, Joseph wept.
 18 His brothers then came and threw themselves down before him. "We are your slaves," they said.
 19 But Joseph said to them, "Don't be afraid. Am I in the place of God? 20 You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. 21 So then, don't be afraid. I will provide for you and your children." And he reassured them and spoke kindly to them. - Genesis 50:15-21
Joseph recognized that his brothers were not looking out for his best interest but intended for Joseph to suffer but God intended Joseph's suffering to ultimately save lives and to fulfill the promises made to His great-grandfather Abraham. Does this get Joseph's brothers off the hook for their sin. No. But Jesus does.

These are a few reasons why I think Molinism fails to explain Human will and God's sovereignty. I realize that Dr. William Lane Craig believes that Molinisim is a great tool understand the Bible and Philosophy but I don't think he is right in this although I admire the man for many other reasons. I've been writing several posts on this subject based on the work of William Lane Craig, James White,  and TurretinFan. The posts are regarding  Middle Knowlege (Molinism), Free Will, and God's Sovereignty.  Feel free to check out the past articles. And check out the additional link from James White: Craig vs. Hitchens at Biola Reviewed on the Dividing Line (Update!) This is a link to one of Dr. White's webcasts in which he discusses William Lane Craig's debate against Christopher Hitchen and Dr. Craig describes Calvinism as a "false Christian denomination." And I'm including it here because it points to why Dr. Craig may feel Molinism is a better explanation.

Brennon's Thoughts: See, I Can Change My Mind; or Accepting Molinism
Enhanced by Zemanta