I just watched the October 1st debate between Dr Daniel Wallace and Dr Bart Ehrman. If you haven't seen it use the link below to order it on DVD. It's well worth it. Ehrman has changed his tune. He used to say that we know what the autographs say due to the work critical criticism but when Wallace quoted him saying that he said that he no longer believes that (
link). I've got to give him more credit than Dan "Don't quote me, Bro!" Barker (look at this
link if you didn't get the reference). At least Ehrman says he changed his mind instead of trying to pretend he never said it. Here is a trailer for the October 1st Debate.
SMU Debate: Can We Trust the Text of the New Testament? Daniel B. Wallace & Bart D. Ehrman
David Wood has done it again. Watch his argument showing a fundamental inconsistency in Islam that I was not aware of. 
I admit that I was offended when Herman Cain said the poor and unemployed are in that condition because it is their fault, but this is worse. If his spouse can't trust him to be faithful and he lie about it, why should I expect to be able to trust him to do the right things as President of the United States? I don't.
