What if all of social networking communities were represented as continents on a map, based on the number of members? In 2010, it would have looked like this:
Map of Online Communities [infographic]
Personal blog that will cover my personal interests. I write about Christian Theology and Apologetics, politics, culture, science, and literature.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Learning Like Neo? Matrix-Style Learning Might Be Here - Technology - GOOD
Remember in the Matrix movies where characters could learn new skills and information by directly uploading the data directly into their brains? Well it turns out that we are close to achieving such feats.
I must admit that I prefer this method - through the visual cortex - instead of a hardware physically jacked into my head.
Learning Like Neo? Matrix-Style Learning Might Be Here - Technology - GOOD
The researchers were able to "use decoded functional magnetic resonance imaging to induce brain activity patterns to match a previously known target state." In other words, a person seeking to learn a topic would watch a computer screen and have her brain patterns modified to match those of a person who already knows the content or how to do something.
I must admit that I prefer this method - through the visual cortex - instead of a hardware physically jacked into my head.
Learning Like Neo? Matrix-Style Learning Might Be Here - Technology - GOOD
Related articles
- Scientists Say Instantaneous Learning Just Around The Corner (geektyrant.com)
- Matrix-style instant learning is a real possibility, according to scientific report (digitaltrends.com)
- Vision scientists demonstrate innovative learning method (scienceblog.com)
- Learnin' Matrix-Style! (neatorama.com)
- Potential To Learn High-Performance Tasks With Little Or No Conscious Effort (medicalnewstoday.com)
Answering Muslims: Saudi Arabia Executes another Woman for "Sorcery"
David Wood posted the following video from CNN. I don't condone sorcery but I don't think for a second that beheading a person for it is the way to handle it because we are not living in theocracy and I'm not willing to take the position that it's right to kill someone for something I can't prove. Reading books on sorcery does not mean that one is actually doing witchcraft or sorcery. One of the things that make this wrong is that I seriously doubt that a man would have been prosecuted or executed the same way. In theocratic Israel gender would not have mattered.
Answering Muslims: Saudi Arabia Executes another Woman for "Sorcery"
Answering Muslims: Saudi Arabia Executes another Woman for "Sorcery"
Related articles
- Saudi Woman Beheaded for Practicing 'Witchcraft and Sorcery' (ibtimes.com)
- Saudi woman beheaded for 'witchcraft' (cnn.com)
- Saudi woman beheaded for 'witchcraft' (edition.cnn.com)
- -Saudi Arabia: Woman Beheaded for Witchcraft (answersforthefaith.com)
- Religion of peace news: Saudi woman beheaded for 'sorcery' (doctore0.wordpress.com)
- Saudi Woman Beheaded for 'Witchcraft' (abcnews.go.com)
- Saudi Woman Executed For Sorcery (pinkbananaworld.com)
Future Learning: David Merrill - YouTube
I totally agree that the best learning experiences are both visual and hands-on. Today in the digital age we can have both.
Future Learning: David Merrill - YouTube
Future Learning: David Merrill - YouTube
Related articles
- YouTube Acquires Copyright Management Firm RightsFlow (blogherald.com)
- YouTube for Schools - Now More Schools Can Access YouTube (freetech4teachers.com)
- YouTube Gets Way More Social With Facebook, Google+ Integration (hubspot.com)
- YouTube for Schools: Join the Global Classroom Today! (c24.co.uk)
- 'YouTube for Schools' a portal that helps curate education (10ison.com)
Labels:
David Merrill,
Digital,
Education,
School,
Sifteo cubes
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Did the Umayyads change the Qur'an? - YouTube
Muslims tell us that the Qur'an has been perfectly preserved. Oddly enough, there isn't a shred of evidence for this preposterous claim. Indeed, a brief examination of the history of the Qur'an reveals significant changes to the text. In this video, L'Orientalist shows that changes were taking place even after Uthman produced his revised, standardized edition of the Qur'an.
Answering Muslims - Did the Umayyads Change the Qur'an?
Did the Umayyads change the Qur'an? - YouTube
Monday, December 12, 2011
Obama '60 Minutes' Interview: GOP Presidential Candidates' Core Philosophy Is The Same (VIDEO)
| Image by jamesomalley via Flickr |
Obama '60 Minutes' Interview: GOP Presidential Candidates' Core Philosophy Is The Same (VIDEO)
Related articles
- Obama on '60 Minutes': Core philosophy of GOP candidates identical (thegrio.com)
- Obama Makes His Case For A Second Term (huffingtonpost.com)
- Obama: Core Philosophy of GOP Candidates the Same (israelnationalnews.com)
- Obama Sizes up GOP Candidates (myfoxny.com)
- Obama Criticizes GOP Bullheadedness in '60 Minutes' Interview (theroot.com)
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Obama’s War on Religion | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament
| Image via Wikipedia |
Obama’s War on Religion | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Claude Mariottini,
culture,
Politics,
President,
Rick Perry
Michael Voris, Diaa Mohamed, and Bart Ehrman on Thursday's DL
Since some readers of this blog seem to be clueless about what scholarly critiques look like, take a lesson from Dr James White and notice how an expert deftly handles not just the Word of God but also a variety of different subjects.
Michael Voris, Diaa Mohamed, and Bart Ehrman on Thursday's DL
Michael Voris, Diaa Mohamed, and Bart Ehrman on Thursday's DL
23 and 1/2 hours: What is the single best thing we can do for our health? - YouTube
Dr. Mike Evans gives a good lecture on health!
23 and 1/2 hours: What is the single best thing we can do for our health? - YouTube
23 and 1/2 hours: What is the single best thing we can do for our health? - YouTube
Leibniz on the Universe and its Author - Apologetics 315
Brian Auten posted the following quote from one of my favorite historical persons!
Leibniz on the Universe and its Author - Apologetics 315
"...if we could sufficiently understand the order of the universe, we should find that it exceeds all the desires of the wisest men, and that it is impossible to make it better than it is, not only as a whole and in general but also for ourselves in particular, if we are attached, as we ought to be, to the Author of all, not only as to the architect and efficient cause of our being, but as to our master and to the final cause, which ought to be the whole aim of our will, and which can alone make our happiness."
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, The Monadology, 1714 (more here)
Leibniz on the Universe and its Author - Apologetics 315
Related articles
- Gottfried Leibniz's Argument From Contingency (moduspownens.wordpress.com)
- Newton vs. Leibniz; The Calculus Controversy (thebeerevelation.wordpress.com)
- Leibniz vs Spinoza (theesposito.wordpress.com)
- Standards in Science and Technology Studies (social-epistemology.com)
- The Advent Calendar of Physics: Introducing Energy [Uncertain Principles] (scienceblogs.com)
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Draculatheism - National Messianic Jewish | Examiner.com
Mariano Grinbank has written a great post pointing out how the 1992 movie Bram Stoker's Dracula is a good metaphor for atheism. Take a look:
Draculatheism - National Messianic Jewish | Examiner.com
Draculatheism - National Messianic Jewish | Examiner.com
Related articles
- Bram Stoker's Dracula - 1992 (jdcwitherton.com)
- Where did Bram Stoker get his inspiration for Dracula (wiki.answers.com)
- Bauman Rare Books Offers Highly Prized First Edition of Bram Stoker's Dracula (prweb.com)
- Free Book: Dracula (kindlebookaday.wordpress.com)
Labels:
Atheism,
Bram Stoker,
Bram Stoker's Dracula,
Dracula,
Mariano Grinbank
He Lives: Bad to Worse
I really enjoy Dr David Heddle's blog. In this post he takes both Dr Richard Carrier and John Loftus to task.
Read the post at the link to see why he would write that.
He Lives: Bad to Worse
I see why such thoughts as Loftus' are "free." Carrier and Loftus are among your best and brightest? Sucks to be you.
Read the post at the link to see why he would write that.
He Lives: Bad to Worse
Labels:
Christianity,
Criticism,
David Heddle,
John Loftus,
Richard Carrier
Answering Muslims: You are getting sleepier and sleepier . . .
This video raises questions that we should at least begin to ask
Answering Muslims: You are getting sleepier and sleepier . . .
Answering Muslims: You are getting sleepier and sleepier . . .
Labels:
culture,
David Wood,
God,
Islam,
Muslim,
Religion Spirituality
The Top 7 Things You Can't Do as a Moral Relativist - Apologetics 315
About half a week ago, Brian Auten posted a great article pointing to what moral relativism is. He summarizes 7 things that a Moral Relativist can't do and be consistent. Here is a list.
As an added bonus, Brian even adds links to further resources. The really interesting thing about this list is that moral relativist still do it anyway and most miss the inconsistency in their own position. Follow the link to read Brian's article.
The Top 7 Things You Can't Do as a Moral Relativist - Apologetics 315
Things You Can't Do as a Moral Relativist:
Bonus #8: Stephen Meyer, in the TrueU video series (which is excellent for group study), lists a couple more. Edit: Meyer's number 8 is: Relativists can’t complain about the problem of evil. But his number 2 is: The relativist can't complain about being mistreated.
- Relativists Can’t Accuse Others of Wrong-Doing
- Relativists Can’t Complain About the Problem of Evil
- Relativists Can’t Place Blame or Accept Praise
- Relativists Can’t Claim Anything Is Unfair or Unjust
- Relativists Can’t Improve Their Morality
- Relativists Can’t Hold Meaningful Moral Discussions
- Relativists Can’t Promote the Obligation of Tolerance
As an added bonus, Brian even adds links to further resources. The really interesting thing about this list is that moral relativist still do it anyway and most miss the inconsistency in their own position. Follow the link to read Brian's article.
The Top 7 Things You Can't Do as a Moral Relativist - Apologetics 315
Related articles
- Are You a Moral Relativist? Take This Test to Find Out (scientificamerican.com)
- An Inept Attempt to Defang the Problem of Evil (crossexaminedblog.com)
- Truth & Relativism, Pt. I (lightandtruthonline.com)
- Truth & Relativism, Pt. 2 (lightandtruthonline.com)
Friday, December 9, 2011
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Gospels and Acts as History by Timothy McGrew - Apologetics 315
Brian Auten just posted a lecture by Dr Timothy McGrew on the reliability of the New Testament. He explains why we should take the Gospels and Acts as Historical and not fiction. Brian posted Dr McGrew's lecture in Video format, MP3, and even the powerpoints! Follow the link to Apologetics 315 to get your hands on this information!
Gospels and Acts as History by Timothy McGrew - Apologetics 315
Gospels and Acts as History by Timothy McGrew - Apologetics 315
Related articles
- Demonstrating the Gospel (redculture.wordpress.com)
- The Order of the New Testament Canon (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Book Review - Sherwin-White. Part One. (sandwichesforsale.blogspot.com)
- Undesigned Coincidences (str.typepad.com)
Labels:
Acts of the Apostles,
Bible,
Christianity,
Gospel,
History,
Jesus,
New Testament,
Tim McGrew
OK, How Many Lies Can You Pack into One Video? Ask Michael Voris!
Dr. James White posted the following video and comments today on his blog.
You can read his comments on the video at the following link
OK, How Many Lies Can You Pack into One Video? Ask Michael Voris!
He responded to this video on today's Dividing Line. You can hear that at the following link.
Today on the Dividing Line: Michael Voris and 40,000 Denominations, Ehrman, Diaa Mohamed
You can read his comments on the video at the following link
OK, How Many Lies Can You Pack into One Video? Ask Michael Voris!
He responded to this video on today's Dividing Line. You can hear that at the following link.
Today on the Dividing Line: Michael Voris and 40,000 Denominations, Ehrman, Diaa Mohamed
Related articles
- Michael Voris: Obama explained in 5:39 (mundabor.wordpress.com)
- Voris responds: "There are many people in the Church who have it out for us..." (patheos.com)
- World: WHERE RUSSIA AND CHINA COLLIDE (time.com)
- Counterpoints to Ehrman (liturgical.wordpress.com)
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Darth Vader's Greatest Speech Ever Made - YouTube
Okay. This was beautifully done!!!
Darth Vader's Greatest Speech Ever Made - YouTube
In his final moments, Anakin Skywalker recalls the days of The Clone Wars in the arms of his son.
A visual representation of Charlie Chaplin's famous speech from 'The Dictator' put into the Star Wars universe.
--------
Speech and audio taken from: http://youtu.be/qLci5DoZqHU
Music by Hans Zimmer
Darth Vader's Greatest Speech Ever Made - YouTube
Related articles
- Clone Wars' Slavery Arc (Finally) Turns Anakin Ugly (wired.com)
- Orson Welles Was George Lucas's First Pick to Voice Darth Vader (neatorama.com)
- Star Wars Unites with Glee, Millions Of Voices Cry Out In Terror and Are Suddenly Silenced. (snirk.com)
- Affiliate Link - Star Wars: Darth Vader and the Lost Command (battlegrip.com)
- How did Darth Vader come to be in existence (wiki.answers.com)
Labels:
Anakin Skywalker,
Clone Wars,
Darth Vader,
Mashup,
Star Wars,
YouTube
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Bring it::Question Evolution! Campaign
It's an amazing thing how people like to claim that they are free thinking and approach everything with "healthy" skepticism yet still willing to claim that macro evolution is an undisputed fact. Part of science is questioning all conclusions and presuppositions - testing them to see what is true. I think a good example is how for a hundred years it was considered a fact that the speed of light is constant in all reference frames, but now it's being called into question and researched more. I see nothing wrong with that, although I think we will still find that it is constant, but it doesn't hurt to look. Why is it so bad to question evolution? Why wouldn't you want to make sure it's correct? I mean if it's true, more research can only confirm it. Mariano has pointed to me to two links to web resources that brings up such questions and invite others to do the same. The first one can be found at
Question Evolution! Campaign
Use this link to find out all about the campaign. The campaign was also written up in an article over at Creation Ministries International. You follow this link to read it.
The article even has a list of questions that are being considered problematic to the theory of evolution.
There is even a video to go along with this campaign.
If anyone thinks they can answer these, please do. Bring it if you can.
Question Evolution! Campaign
Use this link to find out all about the campaign. The campaign was also written up in an article over at Creation Ministries International. You follow this link to read it.
The article even has a list of questions that are being considered problematic to the theory of evolution.
15 Questions summary
Note to would-be evolution defenders: please read the full brochure and linked articles before attempting to answer the questions, otherwise you will likely be wasting your time boxing at shadows.- How did life with specifications for hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
- How did the DNA code originate?
- How could copying errors (mutations) create 3 billion letters of DNA instructions to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
- Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
- How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
- Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed?
- How did multi-cellular life originate?
- How did sex originate?
- Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing?
- How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years?
- How did blind chemistry create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality?
- Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated as ‘science’?
- Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution?
- Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as the operational science?
- Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?
There is even a video to go along with this campaign.
If anyone thinks they can answer these, please do. Bring it if you can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







